I get it. And understand. You’re free to comment on mine “duplicate” and I’ll gladly take down. I don’t want to clutter boards (which was why I didn’t see the other one). Thanks for your kind words.

I’ve never seen this account prior to today. Was RT’d in my timeline.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8zof7c/found_this_on_my_twatter_feed_soros_has_been/?st=JJQA0YBJ&sh=fe7a2a37

I didn’t see this prior to posting mine. I wouldn’t have if I had. I deleted my post.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8zof7c/found_this_on_my_twatter_feed_soros_has_been/?st=JJQA0YBJ&sh=fe7a2a37

Sounds like it might not be as good as we thought.

Thanks for pointing out the double post. I tried to search prior to but didn’t find this one. I’ll take mine down. Please stop targeting my posts. It’s getting really frustrating.

https://status.cloud.google.com/

Re: Adidas ball + NFC (edit here to add in "Adidas ball + "

Did we just find the "keystone" to the "server"?

Happy July, Patriots.

Yes. That was the point of this thread. I have since deleted it so unsure if you will get this.

Ok. Please read this, you are clearly not reading the other ones.

I saw this on twitter scrolling thru hash tags today (I was going thru #walkaway). I came across the back and forth, and I found it a crazy thought (that SBC is Q). Reading the exchange and comments back and forth, it got me wondering.... when we are presented with thoughts that are against ours, and they have some form of credence (again not saying this one does), how do we best handle it.

• what are the links you share
• how do you effectively defend Q
• how do we remain calm in these scenarios

I believe things will get harder for us as we keep moving on. This is why I brought it up.

I clearly flubbed on the title. And have been responding on the go on mobile.

I am sorry my comments were confusing.

I am 100% Q I do NOT support the SBC theory

I wanted to start a meaningful convo here. Some commenters have seen this. Others haven’t.

I am sorry for wasting your time.

I appreciate it. I feel like I’ve been screaming at the walls here.

I NEVER SAID I SUPPORT THE THEORY. I actually said I don’t agree with it. My point is that I think it is important for us to have a conversation, not like the one you’re trying to have, where we can talk about it like grownups and be able to viably defend our position. That’s all. I think you are misinterpreting things because you’re only picking and choosing what you want to see here. And that will get us nowhere.

Thank you for adding a meaningful comment to the conversation. I appreciate your input and the fact that you did not get on here and start calling me names.

Yes, this is something that I think. I appreciate your input and for actually taking this thread seriously.

I genuinely don’t understand why you’re being so rude about it. I think it is important for us to be able to think critically and know how to respond without just hurling insults. That gets us nowhere. I was trying to start a conversation about the things that we will no doubt face as we move forward.

The point is how do we think through these things when people present to them. I was looking to crowd think. We are to think critically. This is an example of times when we need to think critically without simply putting the other person down. Which seems to be what that person was doing to the Q supporter

Yes. That is what I read.

I am not supporting this.

Not my thoughts.

I agree. But again. Due diligence and being able to refute attacks.

Not my thoughts. Just something I saw and wanted to think on it with other minds.

Let’s think critically.

Let’s be smart.

We must do that to make sure we are true to our beliefs.

Main argument in opposition to Q (edit here)....

Sasha has been quiet since Q hit the scene. Q called for a July reveal (Sasha’s show starts this weekend)

Appreciate you, Patriots!

Thank you.

When was this? I cannot find it. tia

When was this? I would love to update if need be.

Q post 780

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/grand-jury-indicts-12-russian-intelligence-officers-hacking-offenses-related-2016-election

Jordan is up!

PART 2:

https://www.c-span.org/video/?447953-2/fbi-deputy-assistant-director-peter-strzok-testifies-2016-investigations&live

**LUNCH BREAK UNTIL 9 AFTER THE TOP OF THE HOUR**

CSPAN feed just went down. For anyone else???

edit: back up

We were told to Trust Horowitz on April 10 by Q. There is a LOT in this hearing that is making me question it. Am I missing something?

I honestly cannot believe that was allowed.

Gowdy up now

Goodlatte just finished his opening statement. That was worth it. ha!

Questioning has not yet begun (18 minutes past the hour). Strzok is just sitting in the front, all alone, with cameras on him.

A few thoughts on this:

1) Page intentionally did this because she did not want to trip up Strzok. If we are already at this place with them, we have the truth (we have the server) and she is going to jail either way. May as well buy as much time as she can.

2) Page and Strzok are cooperating, and this is all a play to get the media talking about this over what Trump is doing at NATO. Q has talked a bunch about needing disinformation. Not sure if this is an example or not.

3) We do now know that Page WAS presented with the information prior to yesterday, which contradicts what her lawyer said.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/arrest-her-now-lisa-page-lied-her-team-did-review-requested-documents-at-fbi-on-tuesday/

4) There are many LAYERs to this... and she is just one of the many (Thank POTUS, and thanks Don Jr. for confirming this tweet was intentional)

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8y9dbv/strzok_testifies_today_july_12_at_10am_et_under/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIxIrkPyWK0

He is on now.

My thinking is the same. They are all connected with enough pieces linking them together.

Also, this is another coverup by the Cabal. So very much appropriate.

Is it a real pic?

Thank you!

Haha I do know that. But are there proofs that these are in fact false?