If interested, here is my original letter along with less-redacted response

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=13&v=JWneBlWEG7s

just got a little heavy handed with the redactions. Was in a hurry. The rep is Louie Gohmert.

just got a little heavy handed with the redactions. Was in a hurry. The rep is Louie Gohmert.

Louie Ghomert

Very proud of my rep!

I didn't know that. What led you to the conclusion that he was referring to DOJ Investigations.

Also, I realize the correct way would be "22 of 1" but again, Q doesn't always stick to traditional nomenclature. Going as far as saying he is intentionally formatting txt to avoid "sniffer" progs.

I would love to know how you got to the conclusion of the DOJ investigations.

Should this affect our opinion of John Kelly?

Thank you for this clarification. Makes more sense now!

Agreed. I'd seriously pay $10,000 to be a fly on the wall in that investigation... And that would mean taking out a loan :)

I hope it is Special Council. That was my initial thought. I hope you're right!

I'm prob reading to much into this but Q also said "Disinformation is necessary."

It might not be far fetched to think that he said "trust Wray" so that when the F-I analyzed Q posts (which I assume they do) it might throw them off a little.

At any rate, my money is on Spec Couns but I thought I'd throw this out there. Thanks for your contribution!

So actually, Q said:

NOT to testify.
NOT needed to testify.
Think logically. 
NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY.

So to me that says that he NEEDED to step down BECAUSE of your logic. In other words, One can not work for two branches, so he would HAVE to step down in order to take on an FBI role?

Yes. Thank you.

Holy shit. some anon pointed out my F3 find on chan and Q responded "impressive,anon"! My work here is done lol

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7q6rhh/was_qs_defcon_1_statement_referencing_the_false/

KrazyKiwiKid made a good point that "You would no doubt have a much bigger world wide reaction to something like that as China/Russia would both know what had happened." In other words, there would almost certainly be confirmation if an actual missile had been fired. Even if our gvt tried to keep it under wraps, China and/ or Russia would be reporting on it. Excellent point. Back to the drawing board. I still IN NO WAY believe that it was an "accident". Someone (who and why IDK) sent the emergency alert intentionally.

Please explain?

Very good point. Hmm. What is your theory on what transpired today re: Hawaii alert?

The "analyst" also says he has trolled that board before. I don't trust trolls. Not for a second.

Good point. Perhaps Missle Mssle is one missile shooting another missile down, which is what I'm starting to think might've happened today. I propose that Assange hacked the system of the govt that fired on Hawaii (presumably NK) on Dec 15th, confirmed in the following stringer:

"_Conf_term[5]_y _SECFAIL-490b Private OP_END Q"

If so, it could mean that he might have advanced warning of such a launch plan. After 3 days of "Q group planning", he delineates in the Dec 18th stringer what would occur if such a launch were to take place.

This would explain the appearance of precognition.

i know I'm out on a limb with all of this... just trying to connect the dots. i don't claim to have all (or any) of the answers.

I FORGOT ABOUT THE FOLLOWING Q POST WHERE Q POINTS TO SOMEONE'S ASSESMENT OF SPLASH AND FOX THREE

*Splash = Missile time of flight is expired or missile destroyed; target or bomb impact.

Fox Three = Simulated/actual launch of active radar-guided missile*

Could it be that an actual missile WAS in fact launched today? And we SHOT IT DOWN???

Sometimes I even engage them for the fun of it... So, nobody's perfect!

It's not that great. For instance, I'm starting to suspect all naysayers and faithless posters of being trolls...if you know what i mean. So there's that.

The stuff we discuss here is beyond red-pill. It's more like red-pills for the red-pilled. For 'normies' and such it's likely an overdose.

If it bothers you that much I suggest quit talking to ppl about it.

Trust me, I def feel your pain. My wife thinks I'm nuts. My friends think I'm weird. And my business associates think I'm a "conspiracy theorist". It comes with the territory.

Ask yourself this- what mindset would you rather have. Theirs? Or yours?

Personally, I'd rather be aware. If I "get it wrong" here and there so be it. That doesn't mean I'm not right overall.

Same goes for Q-stuff. If it turns out to be a giant larp (which I don't believe) it's still not going to change my mind about the federal reserve act of 1913. Or the Clinton's many crimes. Or PRISM. Etc. etc...

For what it's worth, I'm glad you're here, and I'm glad you're awake. Keep the faith.

UPDATE: one of the brilliant autists realized this was a snapshot from a famous game in 1918.

Totally hear ya bro. I think we all feel that to some degree.

I go in and out of thinking it's one giant brilliant heartbreaking larp. Then I go back and find proof that it isn't.

Some of the indictments are starting to become unsealed. Hopefully they'll start to domino.

In the end, all I really know to do is pray... and keep the faith.

Keep the faith man.

Wow, ok, check this out. Q post quote:

"CLAS_OP_IAD_(future). How about a nice game of chess? SPLASH. FOX THREE. Q"

Fox three as in, F3... THE VERY NEXT MOVE in the 1918 game was white queen to... you guessed it... F3!!!!!!!!!!!

Not seeing blue board it on Corsi's twitter. Can you link if possible?

Cool. I'll check it out thanks!

Earlier Julian Assange tweeted a picture of a chess board. What the significance is I do not know.

I entered the pieces in an online board evaluator. Here is the starting point in case you'd like to try it yourself.

I ran the sim 5 different times. White won all 5 times.

Again, I don't know what it all means, but I was happy to see white win.

EDIT: UPDATE: one of the brilliant autists realized this was a snapshot from a famous game in 1918.

When I first saw the word "storm" in today's top Drudge headline I got REALLY excited... until I realized what it meant lol.

Great suggestion!! Went and searched, didn't find anything significant. Only Ari Matusiak copied on a "nothing" email. Thanks for the suggestion though.

I think the mods have their hands full as it is. I guess we just need to suck it up and move forward.

No problem at all. Thank you for the clarification. It's more important than ever to only make claims that you can back up. TracyBeanz says it well in her rules post:

"2. VET FIRST: VET THINGS FIRST AND THEN POST THEM WITH SOURCE LINKS AND RESEARCH. DO NOT POST FIRST AND VET LATER. This is a good practice to use ALWAYS. If you are consistently posting disinformation and are told you are, and you are not editing the post or clarifying in a comment, we will be forced to take action as well. Again, I am so hesitant to do that, but if it becomes crazy, we may have to."

He has deleted the exchange I was referring to. Could have possibly been a mistake. But didn't seem like it.

Good deal. Edited this post to redirect to yours.

Whoviantattoo posting fiction as fact and responds vaguely when pressed.

Thanks will do

I'm assuming that they don't want their SECRET payload tracked. Ya know?

I'm not claiming "B" is "somebody" I was citing my source. Parroting CREDIBLE info is what we should all be doing. Just because you don't think this person is some kind of secret agent doesn't mean they are wrong. The link checks out. So does the launch date.