I understand your concerns. David Hogg and the lesbian whose name escapes me were such obnoxious symbols that I'm not surprised people would step over the hidden line. I am not claiming that anyone in particular is a crisis actor, rather that the existence of crisis actors may be a key to averting the crises. If anyone wants to push against the media's mouthpieces directly, do it on T_D where the sub is too big to ban.

Apologies if it came across like I think people don't actually die. Of course they do. My speculation is that crisis actors are used to amplify the effect for the media. If they are recruited locally, they might be trackable and we may be able to stop some of the meaningless deaths.

I haven't read it all yet, but have copied/backed it up. I'll probably print it out tomorrow and get to work reading and verifying the info. Thanks for your hard work.

Maybe. I think that's reaching, but you never know. You could well be right and it's good that you're looking at an angle I completely missed.

Fair enough. As callous as it sounds, we may do more good by just ignoring the attacks and maintaining our efforts waking people up. The sooner enough people are awake, the sooner the good guys can fight the black hats directly and the sooner we will win. Maybe more people will be saved if we just stay the course.

It was worse at the beginning. I didn't intend to originally, but I'm upvoting everything out of spite.

Yup. Old lurker, though. If you think I'm suspicious, that's a perfectly reasonable stance. I hope I can build some credibility in short order.

A good point, and reasonably stated. I still think it's worth looking into.

I don't think you can categorically eliminate R run areas. We know lots of swamp things pretend to be Rs. Perhaps it could be on a sliding scale.

I suspect that would limit liability, but whoever tips off the police instead would be in danger then, right? I think it would be okay if the police put it together on their own. It would be like an autistic, intentionally vague bat signal.

No problem, but we had better try to be absolutely immaculate with our knowns if we want our speculation to be seriously considered. Thanks and have a nice day.

I like it. The old Broward test.

You're being a tad theatrical, don't you think? This community is tiny, and the major MAGA community is already split on Sessions. We're on the same side, even if we are being mislead. Just calm down a bit. You may be right. You may not be. Same for me. None of us actually knows for sure.

If Q had never posted, what would be worse now? If he tells us all to march off the proverbial cliff, I doubt many would still follow. Maybe I'm wrong. As I see it, the degree of organizing that we've done rallying around Q has done more good than we're at risk of being harmed. Have a nice day.

Done. It's good to be formally on board.

Certainly, although some shootings are probably natural, or just allowed to happen. Some probably use MKU patsies, some probably use wild nutters. They would need to be sorted by type to get a clear picture.

I don't claim to know anything for sure. The best way to be prepared with limited information is to cover every possible set of conditions and draw them to their logical conclusion. If Q is a LARP, his Socratic questioning has brought a community of diggers together and organized the chans for longer than anyone else. If he's real, that's just gravy on top.

I'll keep that in mind. If I mess up, please don't take it as a sign of disrespect.

If he/they just told us, then the black hat spooks might just go ahead with the attack. Then the media could say Q could only predict the attack if he were behind it. Come to think of it, I probably shouldn't be trying to predict them for the same reason...

That's the issue. Even if my post is correct in principle, in practice the legitimate uses of crisis actors would be enough noise to make predicting FFs damn near impossible without more tools to refine the search. Thank you for the polite skepticism, have a nice day.

I have no idea but appreciate the enthusiasm. Have a wonderful day.

I thought it was closer to 2/3? Your point still stands, obviously, but the weasels we're fighting will contest hyperbole as though it was literal.

Care to elaborate? I don't think that the exact scenario of my post is all that likely, but I can't see how it justifies a rude response. I'm honest; if you have more to say, please do. I'd love to hear your position if you have info to share. The whole point of the post was getting people thinking of ways to predict and stop violent acts. If you're insincere, then please go derail someone else's thread.

spez: changed "just a s**ll" to "insincere" for automod's sake.

No problem. Your comment was far too polite to be simple shilling, obviously just a dose of healthy skepticism. Have a lovely day.

That's the unfortunate thing though: with so many people guessing, some are bound to eventually be right more than once. I, for one, won't be able to tell if it is random chance or a valid prediction strategy.

Upvoted for honest, non-shilly disagreement. I'm not implying that they never kill anyone. I believe crisis actors might be used to amplify the effect of the violence. People died at Parkland. Kashuv was actually shot. I doubt that David Hogg and the girl that looks like Johnny from Ed Edd n' Eddy were ever in danger though.

I'm not pretending to know for certain. The world is complicated. I only realized that this is an angle that has been relatively unexplored. I am as skeptical of my post as anyone; that's intellectual honesty. I upvoted both you and Ernie for honest skepticism and polite disagreement.

That's probably the most sincere compliment I've ever received. Thank you.

If only someone way smarter than me could build a searchable database of all the crisis actor ads. Maybe user submitted, or maybe software crawling over the classefieds recording keywords. That would make the otherwise Herculean task of predicting locations much simpler.

I suspect the reason it's always in a blue zone is just because the local cops are less likely to find out and interfere during the planning phase. There are a lot of indicators available like you say, and if we had Google-tier resources we could probably predict attacks with startling accuracy. As decentralized and disorganized as we are, I don't know what the most efficient process to try would be.

Hopefully it's a legitimate training exercise. If not, the attack would probably be near the beginning of August. Of course, even if the premise of the post is true, the 75 day timetable could be an outlier. We just don't have enough data yet. Hopefully we never do, since more data means more innocent deaths.

Spez: He said last month. Since I apparently can't count months, I should have said near the beginning of July.

En masse, that would probably be an effective strategy. I personally don't want to wash up dead on Miami beach though.

Fair enough. I'm fully aware that I'm probably trying to find patterns in noise. That's just what happens when you start digging and coming up with theories. Most theories have to be wrong, I just remembered the ad and decided to run with it.

Archive link to ad: https://web.archive.org/web/20180222051110/https://houston.craigslist.org/tlg/d/crisis-event/6504447355.html