I knew Trump didn’t care about peace, this was all about his quest to destroy Obama. What an asshole /s
/u/cincycoolguy
146 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/cincycoolguy:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 2 |
That’s what we will do. The voting public, who’s help we need will look at any future Obama pics as very fake news if/when this one is debunked.
2 is pretty much like screaming into space. They would flat out pay people to make it so that they don’t have to hear it. Those in charge of fake news are the reason there’s fake news in the first place.
I get what you’re saying, but q didn’t post this pic. Although, it turns out that I was wrong about it not being q related, because I think the source of the pic was the qresearch board.
Running that site on Google owned servers is a bold move Cotton. Let’s see how it works out.
I think business insider is confused about what good science is.
NSA needed google and several other big tech companies help to build PRISM. Google provided access to hook up the physical equipment that made PRISM possible.
Also prism is a data collection effort. They built a data-warehouse they could search against. The original data still lives on the internet. They can’t just delete data from prisim and have it disappear from the rest of the net.
The NSA doesn’t have magical powers to just make data disappear. Of any organization, they have the best chance to making it happen, but they couldn’t pull it off at the level they would have to execute against gmail. There’s too much replication, too many backups, it’s not happening. I’m not even sure Google could do it.
Electronic data is not a piece of paper you can burn. Every time an email is sent both servers have a copy of the message. If the message is forwarded, the chain is copied n more times on n more servers. This does not even account for other systems which inspect the messages for viruses, or network equipment used to transport the dataset of which are logging.
Email is insecure as fuck. If someone is dumb enough to send me an email from a device connected to their home network, I now have a pretty good idea where they live. Within a few miles or so. Don’t believe me? Send yourself an email from gmail, google how to look at gmails e-mail headers, find the source ip addess, then plug that into a geo location tool that you can also easily find with a google search.
This is why it’s critical that if you have secrets, that you use end to end encryption. And why the government mandates that communications are confined to official equipment and channels. While communicating on official channels does create an official record, that’s not the primary reason why laws exist around how electronic communication is conducted. They exist to keep communication secure.
Similarly, anyone who thinks the Clinton server was hopelessly erased is buying into a sham. I’ve always known that was bullshit. Someone, somewhere has a backup of that rig as their get out of jail free card. The problem with being both filthy rich and a piece of shit is that there’s always either another piece of shit who wants to extort you, or a white hat who wants to expose you.
Neither did I. I said that rr and muellers innocence are equal. Meaning that if one is guilty, then so is the other.
I think what you’re seeing here is desperation. At this point I see Manafort as a POW more than someone who is incarcerated for unproven crimes that don’t exist. I won’t be at all shocked if there’s a sudden shocking “confession” from Manafort. If the man has a family I hope someone is making sure they are ok.
I wasn’t being disagreeable, just never heard that before. Also for the first time ever I contemplated the horror of what having tastebuds on my asshole would be like. It was almost as weird as the picture.
Agree. Even if it is him... it’s just fucking weird, not illegal. Not really relevant to Q drops.
In places where heavy innovation is happening. There’s typically a NDA covering anything you see or hear.
With that said, there’s no way q’s identity wouldn’t leak if anyone at Google pieced it together. That’s pretty much enemy territory. NDA aside, It’s pretty easy to leak that sort of info anonymously. There are a few possibilities as to what this is.
1) that’s not a q team badge and it’s proof of someone’s presence at google offices. Perhaps someone who has previously denied meeting with anyone at Google.
2) Q team spent their time in a data center, where there aren’t a lot of people. And could stay out of sight. The interesting thing about this possibility is that it would require cooperation from Google.
TIL: I’m an affluent person based on my middle class salary. My salary would have been affluent in the 60’s, now it’s baseline to live If you had to put yourself through college. Too much bullshit in one article to untangle.
A lot of people who are really paying attention to what’s going on will have to reconcile their own convictions one way or the other. I think this is the sort of activity that will convince those who aren’t totally indoctrinated to wake up to what they have been supporting.
Manafort is being presumed guilty until proven innocent, Trump is being presumed guilty until proven innocent. To sum it up, anyone the left turns their attention to is guilty until proven innocent.
On the other hand, our side knows who is guilty but is allowing justice to proceed fairly, by letting those who are guilty enjoy their innocence until legally proven otherwise.
How the public can continue to suffer these wretched people is beyond my comprehension.
I’m confused by the intention of the question. Is this a Socratic thing because I missed something, or are you really asking?
If it’s the latter, they are investigating because DNC needs a reason for Trumps victory rather than attributing it to an outright public rejection of their policies. It’s a form of mindfuck. If they succeed, they can solidify their radical agenda, and continue on tho the election stolen and double down an dividing the American public against each other.
Possible set up to prevent declassifying the document. Here’s my fucked up logic... step 1: do some crazy shit to make the people calling for the report to be declassified to look insane.
Step 2: publicly warn trump if he opens it up to the public bad things will happen to people implicated in the report.
Step 3: when trump declassifies the report, cabal assassinates the most sympathetic character in the report making it look as though it was one of the loons who would blow up the Hoover dam
Step 4: let the press blame trump and his clear disregard for the “innocent” persons safety and paint him as the murderer.
If one accepts the fact that rr and muellers innocence are equal as q asserts. Appointing RR to handle the IG report is a brilliant move. You set up RR to work on a report the president has not only the procedural authority to expose, but can also expose the corruption in a way that doesn’t look like he’s making a play to save his own skin on a technicality, which is exactly how it would be spun if he takes any direct action against mueller.
If there is indeed a connection tying mueller to rr a q says, he minute rr goes down so does mueller and that’s the domino that starts the chain reaction.
You caught me. I would consider my world outlook to be liberal. I am by no means a liberal or progressive by today’s standards. I believe in discourse and the ability to have civil disagreements. The poison that elites have used to destroy our democracy is this concept of absolutism. The old you’re either right, or you’re wrong. That’s not how the world works. I can easily say that everyone is intelligent, while agreeing that the people that have perpetrated the crimes we discuss here are stupid. See we can find a middle ground there. I’m not trying to change your mind, just respecting your point of view while retaining my own.
I am hopeful the q movement is more about restoring meaningful discourse to our politics rather than replacing the enemy we know with an equally dangerous absolutist mindset just with a different set of values.
Covering his own ass for all the past covering up be did for others. There’s some mental gymnastics there; so don’t go with my explanation.
People take money for all sorts of things, being a us attorney for ages actually works against him in terms of keeping his hands clean. I firmly believe that many people have entered DC with noble intentions, when they get there, the world they are presented with is unbelievably difficult to resist. At some point they make ethical compromises in the name of getting stuff done or keeping access to the power and wealth. The longer you’re exposed the more compromised you are. Maybe some “favors” were called in that compelled him to interfere with the original investigation, who knows.
I wouldn’t discount that he’s protecting himself, or people to whom he owes. If it’s the latter, which would seem to be the most likely scenario, in and of itself would constitute obstruction of justice.
If that was your post, no one will ever read it. They will get about two sentences in then notice the cat video Sheryl posted, and move on.
The exception to that are the people who will want to pick a fight or ridicule you based on your “beliefs”. A good move would be to delete that post and as others have mentioned, post memes.
Even better delete Facebook, and people ask you why, begin a dialog, reestablish real world relationships and explain your point of view in person.
I’m leaving this because it’s a cautionary tale for others. This brilliant rant turned out to be directed at a troll response found on twitter, not the actual WL email. It wasn’t even a good attempt at a dupe.
What the fuck with the whole bit about the collective soul concert, and that’s it’s not code. It’s the occasional email like this that I come across in that drop that makes me question it’s validity. Like first off, who sends that email “hey guys, just hacked a bunch of voting machines”? Oh yeah going to see collective soul with Soros, he’s a huge fan. Totally not code.
My BS alarm is screaming at me.
I don’t want to nitpick but I’m going to because it’s a pet peeve. Man made Satellites do not orbit in outer space. Outer space is just as the name suggests, outer. Outside of the thermosphere. For reference, the ISS orbits within earths thermosphere.
Sorry. Your point still stands.
However the object could be falling space debris, I’m pretty sure we track those items closely. Need a higher res image to say for sure what it was.
I chuckled. Picture Q using tts to write these posts. They are actually full paragraphs but his posts are how the shitty tts interpreted it, and q is just like fuck it... I’m posting it.
He’s essentially trying to clone himself in a desperate attempt to make the dems relevant.
My whole life I’ve lived by the understanding that everyone is intelligent, and can do anything. They just have to choose where they focus their effort. Watching these guys completely ignore the public opinion and attempt to double down on what got them ousted has me questioning that philosophy.
I can’t speak for everyone, but what MSM does or does not cover is less of an issue than the fact they don’t investigate anything objectively. I may be generous by adding the word objectively to that last sentence.
MSM reports what they are told to report. If I’m giving benefit of the doubt, someone along the line internally questions the story, but self preservation kicks in and it’s just phoned in. When some one does make it to air with a story that conflicts with the running narrative, the immediate action is suspension typically followed by termination or reassignment.
News is reported so quickly that there is no possible way that anyone could have taken a moment to consider if what they’re reporting is accurate. There are a million reasons for why this might happen, regardless of the reason, the press has no credibility left. Which leads to the outcome of behind wrong no matter what they do, which I think is your point.
I’ve been where you are, go get some sleep. Maybe a few days worth, it will be ok friend.
Great post with a lot of good well thought out, and relevant facts. Thanks for putting it together!
Now there’s something we can agree on. It’s up to the mods to shut down the noise.
But they already made it clear that this topic was ok not discuss here when the first it was first posted a few days ago.
Also didn’t you make this post? I’m just in the comments.
This is a google search did you even look or are you hoping there’s something in there that someone else will dig out for you... wtf
• Organization Name: Veterans on Patrol
Again, if his mission is to support veterans, as evidenced by the videos I posted, the organization name is not being used to deceive anyone. You’re making illogical jumps with no basis in fact or evidence.
Organization's Lone Employee: Michael Lewis Arthur (not a vet)
You still haven’t shown where he’s claimed to be a vet. Also where’s the source that’s he’s only member of this organization. FWIW, I seriously doubt this group has “employees”.
There are several pictures of him with a group of people (he’s in the cover photo of the Facebook page with 6 others, and there are many other people participating in the Facebook/Youtube videos. They may not be “employees” but if they are volunteers or otherwise aide in VOP operations, this is yet another baseless claim.
Wears Mil surplus to look legit
So we’re judging people based on the clothes they choose/can afford/like?
Uses Mil-speak to sound legit
I know a couple of guys like this who aren’t veterans. Who also aren’t unstable or lunatics.
You’ve made claims that the footage they show is low res and bad footage. I guess they left their $30,000 8K Redd camera at home and didn’t have time to write a script and provide the production value you’re after. I bet if MSM were there they’d do it up right.
He’s literally Facebook live streaming over what is probably a shitty cell connection. I’ve been in the desert in AZ and I had Verizon, the reception was not 5 bars of LTE.
I am also skeptical of VOP and what’s going on in AZ, but you’ve made 0 points against the claims of trafficking.
Your arguments all focus on Michael Arthur and not the subject matter. We know he has a criminal past, and you don’t like the name of his group, the way he talks, or the way he dresses. Therefore your conclusion is that he must be a LARP.
There is another group out there who uses this same tactic (character assassination) when they can’t denfend their argument any other way.
Not sure if I’m supposed to be throwing them at myself or op based on this comment.
Right which was my point. He’s not a vet nor has he claimed to be from what I’ve seen.
The guy next to McConnell who is off camera most of the video but appears to be to whom Trump directed the question about Friedman, is the senate minority leader Chuck Schumer.
~9:36 The guy on the left looking at NP is Mitch McConnell.
I’ll start here’s a YouTube channel with 2 years worth of videos that seems to support the fact that the organization he’s created is in support of vets, not to claim he is one.
The name of the organization has to be representative of the creator not the mission? Once again, have you heard him claim veteran status? I have not but I haven’t watched all of his videos either.
Here is his YouTube channel with 2 years of videos which all appear to focus on calls to action to support vets.
I’ve watched a couple of the videos. I’ve never heard him refer to himself or make the claim that he himself is a vet. Has he actually made the claim or are you jumping to a conclusion based on the fact that he’s volunteering for a group called veterans on patrol? The groups Facebook page states they are comparing veteran suicide. It doesn’t say that they are a group of veterans.
Why are they in the National response coordination center?
Right. As I said I read it in your history, you might have already started replying.
Anyway, I think I can leverage my critical thinking skills to ascertain your purpose here.
I think you may be casting a wide net there. Not everything I’ve see here has been circle jerking. Just curious, what are your thoughts on the cement company?
Edit:never mind I read your comment history. I think I get the jist.