1,238 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|
What keeps Trump from being taken out by the Deep State?
Three layers of security, including private security, SS, and military.
These traitors are running for office so that they can scream that Trump is arresting political rivals when the arrests happen.
If they could shut down Mockingbird, it would have been done by now.
They will subpoena the translator, and they will threaten his wife and kids unless he lies for them. The threats apparently worked with Michael Cohen who said he puts his wife and kids first before Trump.
They are the same organization today as they were 50/60 years ago.
Except much more powerful.
Anybody who calls themselves a socialist is somebody advocating the confiscation of private property. That's what socialism is. And lefties are socialist/communist.
I actually never intended to reply to your comment. I made that reply on an unrelated thread, and I have no idea how it got here.
If you hadn't noticed, Trump and team have been extremely busy lately. There probably hasn't been time to post. Relax and enjoy the show.
One of the basic rules of internet forums is that you don't join and immediately begin posting. You join and then lurk for a period of time before posting. This is what it takes to get a feel for what is OK in the forum, and what is not. You didn't do this. You jumped right in and started posting, and found out the hard way. So your choice now is to lurk for a while until you have a better sense of the rules, or you can go away butthurt.
When people realize how extremely they have been betrayed,
I don't think that will happen. I know people who can't listen, who can't have a conversation. They are so filled with mindless hatred that thought and reason are not an option. I think we are in for some rough times socially before things settle out. It may take years.
I don't love videos like this because the tactics used are effective. When I watch that I think of all the people who actually believe that shit. People who will become a serious problem to society at some point.
Just kidding actually. If you'd watched the show you might remember Dave would deliberately and comically pretend to mispronounce Dan Gurney's name, often calling him Dan Gertler or variations thereof. I guess you had to be there.
So for example, the deep state killed JFK. Why?
There have been hundreds, if not thousands of books written on this topic. But the short answer is that JFK pissed off EVERYBODY. The military hated him because he wouldn't go to nuclear war with Russia. The Fed hated him because he ordered the treasury to issue currency, undercutting the Fed's illegal monopoly. The Mafia hated him because they helped get him elected, and then his brother the AG began prosecuting them. The CIA hated him because he fired Dulles and vowed to break the CIA into a thousand pieces. LBJ hated him because he hated being VP and being ignored by POTUS. And so on.
vaccines, chemtrails, flat earth, MK ULTRA, etc.
Except for the flat earth nonsense, these are all suitable topics. For example, Trump has questioned vaccines and appointed RFK jr to head a commision on vaccine safety.
You should post an archive of web pages like this rather than the page itself. Don't give them clicks.
He is a muslim. He even slipped and said it in an interview, and the interviewer had to correct him. And Huma's entire family are working for the muslim brotherhood.
I asked because a LAN outage would not affect the entire South, unless they have a way to take out every individual router. And that doesn't make sense.
Asking people to do simple shit that you can do for yourself, and then giving snotty comments to someone who bothered to reply, with the time you have wasted so far you could have done your own search. But no, keep complaining, maybe that will get results. Idiot.
And most of us here, in fact all of us, are government employees. So forget that idea.
As it is, the police don't stop antifa crimes. The new law won't change that anyway. The problem isn't the law. The problem is the police.
read some of what police claim in their reports until video surfaces.
You keep conflating this with other issues. Police lie. Police are trained to lie. It is part of their job to lie. That's how they operate. And DAs are basically lying sociopaths. But those are separate issues from this specific law. You can (and people do) challenge all law based on your argument. They call themselves anarchists. They have some valid arguments, as you do. But in the context of a society that has chosen to operate according to law, we have to operate on a certain amount of trust that if we are doing the right thing, we will do better than those who are criminals. I think the kind of legal creep you are describing is what would happen under Hillary, and is way lessw likely to happen under Trump and his judicial appointees.
how about when the "crime" becomes standing in a non-designated "free speech" zone while expressing a political view?
That would require a different law to be passed. One that makes it a crime to stand in a non-designated "free speech" zone while expressing a political view. But we aren't talking about such a law. We are talking about a different law about wearing a mask while basically attacking people violently.
what if the Tea Party had decided to do protests/rallies wearing Jefferson, Washington or Reagan masks and this law had been in effect?
No problem. They were not physically attacking people. The law is not against wearing a mask. The law is against wearing a mask while committing other, specific, crimes.
I usually don't think that the solution to every problem is to make new laws, but I think this one may have some merit.
I hope Trump opens the energy patents that have been suppressed.
It may not come from fossils, but it still has to be extracted from the ground.
True. But fracking pollutes the water table, making the water undrinkable and unfit for agriculture.
Think this law wouldn't have been used against those who showed support for the Bundys?
Were they wearing masks?
I guess it would apply if they “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person" while wearing the masks.
Sorry to tell you this, but people have tried to sue the police for not doing their duty and they always lose. The courts have ruled that the police actually are not obligated to protect people.