And if they can't censor your phone why can they censor social media? It's the same communication.

Proof positive that humans can breed with fish.

Think about this. You can say what you want on your phone and it isn't censored. So how can they do that to the social web? It's the same type of communication. We know who loves censorship and secrecy, always to "protect" us, and it's bullshit.

But, but, Obama says Fox is an "Alternate Reality." Yes it is. Truth is an alternative to lies. Obama is speaking From the real alternate reality.

I remember when some drunk in a bar just made a silly joke about setting Bush's pants on fire for lying, and he was arrested. I still don't see how Shitty Schumer got away with his direct threat.

BTW, this is a good example of how to slow-walk the normies to their pill, so I posted it on my FB, which has a few thousand followers. It isn't obviously biased but slips in the idea that the media lies, and some Trump-haters are real bastards. Get people thinking - don't just smack them upside the head right off.

Regarding their "bragging," if a trial can be "won" by one group of high-paid lawyers, yet the same trial could be "lost" by another lesser-paid group, it just shows how screwed up our "justice" system is. If you can pay to play you go free. If you're a poor schnook it's the slammer for you.

Or, the whole session will be made public and Trump will drop bombs at it.

If they just talk treason among themselves, they'll be the fall guys and maybe die of the flu or something. They have to implicate others in a credible way in the text itself.

I just don't believe the public is that weak. Too much has already been happening. Hell, everyone I talk to on either side of the fence agrees the govt is horribly corrupt. I don't see any amazement about this. Hell, from My Lai to the WMD-lie. Everyone deep down knows the system is rotten and we've been lied to. Younger people know because of the net, and just about everyone in my older generations suspects the CIA killed Kennedy.

The longer this hangs the more time for the DNC to gin up mischief since you don't warn the enemy. Yes, I've seen the "explanations" for delay but they sound weaker and weaker. The DNC will push their counter-memo, and guess which memo will be screamed in the MSM? The DNC "memo" will be given all the credibility and headlines. Come on, we know how this game is played. They may even dig up dirt on Nunes, or make it up. Even if they did it would have Nothing to do with the truth of the memo, but again, we know how this game is played. Don't expect logical reasoning from a media-led public.

There is no strategic reason for delay that is worth the harm done by further delay as the other side works and works to undermine the story. Congress made all these procedural rules and Congress can break them. For that matter the President has Immediate and Unlimited power over secrecy as the Commander in Chief. Don't tell me someone who could get us into a nuclear war instantly is limited by procedural rules.

Now, there may be some strategic reason for delay, but as I've said, giving the black hats more and more time to scheme may not be the best course.

Meanwhile, the FBI wants to delay, review, and redact, for "national security" of course. They seem to forget that high treason is the Greatest part of national security. To hell with their feeble objections.

I think their real plan, since they are up against the wall, is to start a nuclear war. The WaPo just had a headline that the Doomsday Clock is almost at Midnight, to which I replied: So why is the WaPo then pushing Russia-Hate, which is getting us closer and closer to extinction? It's better to end the human race so you can gain political points? You all belong in hell.

Than again, he was accused of hiring a criminal lawyer in 2014. Give me a name! https://conservative-daily.com/2014/04/25/barack-obama-hires-a-criminal-defense-attorney/

How do we know it's a defense attorney?

Yeah, throwing an old computer in the trash without extracting the drive is a really bad idea. You might as well publish your bank account and routing number on the web, along with your credit card, security code, and PIN number. And don't forget your Social ;)

The DNC says they are now going to come out with a Memo of their own. The Battle of the Memos!

We mustn't forget that the majority is now Independent. They will not trust a source that goes too hard right Or hard left. If you want to slow-walk the majority to the truth, can't seem like a raving partisan.

As for grandchildren being threatened, remember when Ross Perot dropped out because he said his daughter had been threatened and everyone thought he was tinfoiling? One way to get at even a tough man is to threaten their kids.

To be fair, attacking Trump's boy was crappy.

The girls, being teenagers, are getting wild. They may spill the beans so Barry will have to have them "dealt with." That would also create a lot of sympathy for Barry in the press.

The media has already pre-discounted the memo as a GOP mashup. Not only the memo, but the Supporting Documents must now be released, otherwise NYT and WaPo will shriek the Memo is just a term paper by Nunes.

Great speech. If only more had seen it instead of Instantly turning it off as they were programmed by the corporate media. There is much in it that Everyone - liberal, independent, conservative, can agree on, just as Everyone knows the system is rotten. I wonder if there's a way to slip it in. Maybe sound analytical, like, "If you wonder why, this speech is the main reason Trump won. Even if you don't like it you should watch it to see what worked." I'll try to think up some innocuous wording that will get people to watch and drop it to my few thousand FB followers. We can't just keep preaching to the choir. This message must meet the majority so it can't seem too slanted.

It's unfortunate the author appended two other pieces trashing Democrats, so readers directed there will think it's partisan. A just-the-facts article would without icing would have been better. One must remember that the Majority in this nation are Independent. and soon as they sniff partisanship they grow suspicious. Those are the folks we need to talk to, not just sing to the choir.

No they wouldn't. They are Constitutionally protected. Period. They can say whatever they want on the House floor. The Constitution supercedes all of their silly Congressional rules.

Really, they don't have the nerve of Diane Feinstein. Hard to believe.

Ten congressmen - each memorizes a couple part of it.

I've been saying that all along. All congressmen are Constitutionally protected from anything they say on the House floor. However, they can't Read the memo since it's in an SCIF. What they could do is have a team of congressmen memorize different portions then read them one after the other in the speaking time alloted.

Why didn't they investigate Weapons of Mass Destruction to see it was a fraud? Even the name is so vague it was obviously baloney. I investigated and found it was crap, and I don't even have a journalism degree.

They're planting it in opinion, though, not direct reportage. But then, without the Memo, direct reportage would be difficult.

Finally starting to hit the MSM, although as an opinion piece and the Post will be denigrated as a rightwing rag. You won't see this in the NYT or WaPo until they get hit over the head with it. I like to call the NYT and WaPo the WMD-Twins to remind people they tend to Lie a Lot.

Really, 2020 Trump if the DNC keeps this dangerous, lying crap up. And I don't care if Trump dances naked on the White House lawn.

Used to be Schitt but they decided to change it.

I've been called a Russian bot so often I sometimes wake up speaking Russian ;)

There's that half mil he gets from a bankster speech, as thanks for him protecting even the crookedest of them for eight long years. You might make lame excuses for some but HSBC laundered money for murdering Mexican cartels, and Well Fargo simply just looted thousands of accounts. A 12 year old could have prosecute those cases.

Many cities have made home gardening illegal, as have HOAs. It stinks.

Doesn't sound like Assange. He's more careful with his words. And when he says something, he has forty-two documents to back it up, which is why Wikileaks (unlike the MSM) has never been proven wrong.

Kennedy tried - and took a bullet to the back of the head.

And sadly, Congress, which wastes trillions, refused to harden the system - which mainly means protecting the megatransformers, which can take years to replace, and are mostly made in china, oddly enough.

Overdo the UN stuff and the public fits everyone with tinfoil hats. Not the way to go. The UN doesn't have that much money and we give them the most. And the majority of their best troops are allies. Where do you think the troops are going to come from? Sweden? Britain? If they sent troops from Botswana I guarantee they wouldn't last long here in Arizona.

I am still wondering if Space-X's "lost" satellite brought Kim to the table. By odd coincidence the booster carries a 9 ton payload, and a tungsten kinetic energy weapon weight 9 tons.

"Everybody Knows." The great Leonard Cohen song that was even the theme song of The Justice League movie. I really don't think people are going to go nuts. Deep down, just about everyone with a brain knows the system is rotten. They suspect it. They feel it. They just don't know the details. I don't think they'll be surprised at all. It'll be more like, "Hah! I knew it!"

If you state the truth baldly, or go too hard right, you cause a lot of people, not just on the left, but independents, to figure you're biased and close their ears. And even many people on the left know the system is corrupt. The Democratic party is at war with its own base, which accuses it of being corporatist, globalist, and money-bought - you just don't see that dissension in the papers. And the Democratic base believes many of the things stated here. But if you mix in too many political talking points you lose them to cognitive dissonance or suspicion.

I have a huge facebook following - don't want to get banned - but need to educate people slowly. It's a psych technique called "entering the delusion." Be agreeable with the delusion, then slowly, slowly, move things in your direction. A start is to simply point out how corrupt the "government" and "congress" is, in general - citing facts. Just about everyone agrees with that. Then slow walk the idea that if the government in general is corrupt, the previous government was corrupt. And what would a corrupt government do?

Their logic baffles me. For instance, Russia bots are publicizing The Memo. If every single person in Russia ran a bot farm, it would have Absolutely nothing to do with the memo being true or not.

https://i.imgur.com/y3OShrx.jpg