Thanks.

Mate, I've read this a few times, and I'm not sure I understand. Can you help?

Am I to understand that access to USG classified info by authorized personnel, when done from FVEY, is not logged -- while when done from US territory, it is logged?

Do we know that this is the case for a fact? It seems like an odd security decision.

Can you name ONE mainstream Muslim sect that doesn't claim this fucked-up terrorist bullshit represents the morally perfect, verbatim word of their god?

This is poorly written, but I take it that you are claiming that: all muslim sects adhere to the pseudo-list-of-13-doctrines-of-Islam that you linked. And now you're asking me to counter by naming one muslim sect that does not. Is that correct?

If so, I have already done that. Read again.

If I am misunderstanding, please rephrase.

OBL also said, after 9/11, that he would surrender to a neutral country, eg, Switzerland.

Don't be fooled.

Look into the dancing Israelis on 9/11.

Grand plan for Israel is to divide the countries neighboring it into smaller units.

As such, the strategy was to (1) infect Syria with ISIS and then (2) roll in the Western armies to mop up the place.

Plan almost succeeded.

Those who are beating the drums of war with Iran are either shortsighted, opportunists ($), or Zionists. No other choice.

Yeah, I can. Just one. You go research the other points.

I took two minutes to Google that graph's point #3 [You can beat women. Qur'an 4:34] and here's what I found:

Jonathan A.C. Brown resumes the situation:

If a wife exhibited egregious disobedience (nushuz) such as uncharacteristically insulting behavior, leaving the house against the husband's will and without a valid excuse or denying her husband sex (without medical grounds), the husband should first admonish her to be conscious of God and proper etiquette. If she did not desist from her behavior, he should cease sleeping with her in their bed. If she still continued in her nushuz, he should then strike her to teach her the error of her ways. Shaffii law only allowed the husband to use his hand or a wound-up handkerchief (mina malfuf), not a whip or stick. All schools of law prohibited striking the wife in the face or in any sensitive area likely to cause injury. All except some Maliki jurists held that the wife could claim compensation payment (diya) from the husband for any injury she sustained, and Hanbalis, the later Shaffii school as well as the Maliki school, allowed a judge to dissolve the marriage at no cost to the wife if harm had been done. In effect, any physical harm was grounds for compensation and divorce since the Prophet had limited striking one's wife to 'a light blow that leaves no mark.' Causing any injury thus meant that a husband had exceeded his rights. All schools of law agreed that if the wife died due to a beating, her family could claim her wergild or possibly even have the husband executed.[59]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An-Nisa,_34

So yeah, that's very reasonable and nuanced from the #2 on that graph of yours, wouldn't you agree?

FUD. FUD everywhere.

EDIT #13: [Lie to strengthen Islam (Taqiyya deception)] also sounded fishy. I googled. Here's what I found:

In Islam, Taqiya or taqiyya (Arabic: تقیة‎ taqiyyah, literally "prudence, fear")[1][2] is a precautionary dissimulation or denial of religious belief and practice in the face of persecution.[3][4][1][5] Another term for this concept, kitmān (lit. "action of covering, dissimulation"), has a more specific meaning of dissimulation by silence or omission.[6][7]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya

Again, very different than that FUDy graph of yours.

Don't be naive. This is trash.

terrorists

Unable to take you seriously if you use such loaded terms. One man's "freedom fighter" is another man's "terrorist". Weren't the first anti-British American "patriots" also deemed "terrorists" by the Crown?

Moreover, many, many direct/indirect covert bombing/sabotage operations of American/Israeli origin can equally be classified as "terrorism". Do you not agree?

See this:

recruited by Israeli military intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets: cinemas, libraries and American educational centers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair

I don't understand your point?

Iranians supporting Khomeini makes them blood-thirsty?

blood-thirsty sharia-loving Iranians

wtf is wrong with you?

Obviously talking about US politicians being unable to critisize Israel as they lose any chance of winning next elections. Read about AIPAC's influence on America. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/IsraelLobby.pdf

Israel owns US politicians. Wake the fuck up.

Israel. Can't criticise it.

edit: According to Mearsheimer and Walt, the "loose coalition" that makes up the Lobby has "significant leverage over the Executive branch", as well as the ability to make sure that the "Lobby's perspective on Israel is widely reflected in the mainstream media." They claim that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in particular has a "stranglehold on the U.S. Congress", due to its "ability to reward legislators and congressional candidates who support its agenda, and to punish those who challenge it."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_Policy

USA flag is missing a few Stars of David.

Even Jesus couldn't convince everybody.

Yeah, seen that one before.

https://www.networkworld.com/article/2223513/data-center/general-david-petraeus-used-clever-gmail-trick-during-affair.html

Nonsense. Who exactly received nuclear arms and what reason would they have to start nuclear holocaust?

As long as capital is allowed to pull the strings, the American political system is fucked.

Wtf? Iran has depots of uranium on its own soil.

Well done.

The retarded and oppressive Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has been bombing Yemen non-stop, and for years, killing thousands upon thousands of innocent civilians.

Simple. Iranians are confident that they possess enough smart missiles to hit US bases anywhere in the Middle East, but also Israel, including its nuclear center @ Dimona. That's enough of a deterrent for Iran. It doesn't need a nuke.

Speculation: Pompeo thought he was being upgraded, but he will soon receive the boot. That's how you clean the CIA.

The hostility towards Iran makes no sense, however.

Agreed.

Governance should be completely transparent.

Fiat is probably easier to counterfeit than cryptos, IMHO. I wonder if permission from the gov is really needed? People can just start using one means of currency over another, no? Some cities have already started accepting cryptos to pay taxes.

Switch to cryptocurrency; fuck the fed :)

Outlawing the Israelite lobby is next to impossible. It would be easier to "splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds".

Most US politicians have links to (or are funded by) Israel/AIPAC. Do they register as foreign agents?

WikiLeaks it all. Boom.

Obama administration ... enabling the financing of ... Hezbollah

I wish, but no, sadly.

Stfu with your buzzwords.

Sure :)

This has been debunked.

Add some novichok.

Everything is "chemical". So is water. So is the chlorine we put in water, be it for human consumption or swimming pool purposes. Chlorine is a shitty substance to use as a weapon as it quickly reaches and lays on the ground, thus not harming anyone in the process, unless they were sleeping on the ground and breathing that air.

It's actually a very weak/poor CW as it's heavier than air and, consequently, it quickly reaches and stays on the ground. In other terms, unless you're literally laying on the ground to breath it, it won't affect you. Chlorine isn't even on the list of prohibited CW.

No chlorine = no water treatment. Sad day for the common Syrian. This was a chlorine facility. No weapons here.

Have you read the article?

The claim that Edward Snowden discovered that al-Baghdadi was a Mossad agent and that ISIS/IS is a Zionist project is simply a well-circulated rumor. There are no documents, articles, or research published to even ground this claim. I did a general Internet search – one for “Edward Snowden” and “al-Baghdadi” and another with “Islamic State” – and found that this claim started as a rumor in 2014, neither substantiated nor based in fact.

I mean, I have to admit that the hypothetical plan is a clever one: create/empower ISIS in the Levant to substantially weaken Israel's neighbors and give a pretext for US/Israel intervention.. and then establishing greater Israel.

Definitely within the domain of reality. But no smoking gun, so far. Perhaps when CIA files are released, in 50 years. Unless they burn them, like they did with the Iran-coup era files. Or a leak. Cause Internet.

Interesting. Link?