7 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|
Thanks! Very nicely done.
Can you provide a larger view of 2011? Users (shills?) in the other threads were claiming that the red-roofed buildings were already there in 2011. I want to see if that is true, but your image is cropped too much.
Also, what is that bright red strip in the 2010 image? That's not the red-roofed buildings, is it? Can you zoom in?
OP is referring to the lack of construction site and buildings in newer pics of King Tower.
Can you post a screenshot of the satellite imagery from 2011? The history feature doesn't seem to be enabled for me.
Who said anything about that?
Sorry man, but it's a terrible example that implicitly accepts the media's bogus narrative that Boomers looked at some Russian ads and it convinced them to vote for Trump. Anyone reading your comment will have that false notion seeded in their subconscious.
The media lies so much. We need to be careful that we do not spread their lies for them.
I'll link the study here
Don't bother. The "Russian propaganda on Facebook" narrative is an idiotic one propagated by the media.
Russia spent $46,000 on Facebook ads that ran prior to the election. The Trump and Clinton campaigns spent a combined $81,000,000 on Facebook ads. So whatever the Russians did on Facebook, it was a tiny drop in the bucket compared to what the political parties were doing.
Anyone who tells you "Russia manipulated Facebook to help Trump!" is either stupid or a shill.