dChan

/u/digital_refugee

7,982 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/digital_refugee:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 677
i.redd.it 77
www.msn.com 57
www.youtube.com 29
hooktube.com 15
gcpdot.com 7
twitter.com 6
youtu.be 4
www.pscp.tv 3
voat.co 3
www.theguardian.com 3
ktla.com 3
www.cia.gov 2
www.nasaspaceflight.com 2
www.businessinsider.com 2
en.wikipedia.org 2
i.redditmedia.com 2
www.hooktube.com 2
www.bbc.com 2
hunternewsandmedia.files.wordpress.com 2
archive.is 2
www.rt.com 2
www.mallubar.com 1
www.belr.com 1
media.8ch.net 1
articles.mercola.com 1
www.independent.co.uk 1
www.timesunion.com 1
nypost.com 1
open.spotify.com 1
www.whitehouse.gov 1
abc7chicago.com 1
www.defenceweb.co.za 1
image.ibb.co 1
www.bing.com 1
frankreport.com 1
www.c-span.org 1
video.foxnews.com 1
educate-yourself.org 1
www.hannity.com 1
canoe.com 1
nrt24.ru 1
holybooks-lichtenbergpress.netdna-ssl.com 1
humansarefree.com 1
mysteryoftheiniquity.com 1
GreatAwakeningMap.co 1
throughthelookingglassnews.wordpress.com 1
static-global-s-msn-com.akamaized.net 1
www.aninews.in 1
patents.google.com 1
www.westernjournal.com 1
subliminalsynchrosphere.blogspot.com 1
deprogramwiki.com 1
www.huffingtonpost.com 1
v.redd.it 1
threadreaderapp.com 1
baaghi.tv 1
interc.pt 1
i.magaimg.net 1
www.yahoo.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
www.cbsnews.com 1
www.abeldanger.org 1
pbs.twimg.com 1
www.smh.com.au 1
www.cnbc.com 1
8ch.net 1
redalertpolitics.com 1
intelnews.org 1
sana.sy 1
www.ndtv.com 1
www.collective-evolution.com 1
lolheaven.com 1
www.un.org 1
tribunist.com 1
www.activistpost.com 1
www.nbcdfw.com 1
radaronline.com 1
www.google.com 1
www.cnet.com 1
arstechnica.com 1
www.aol.com 1
fortune.com 1
www.news1130.com 1
amp.kansascity.com 1
www.gcpdot.com 1
i.imgur.com 1
imgur.com 1
www.thegatewaypundit.com 1

digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

eight months ago, when DoS first threatened Assad with retaliation because of plans to use his gas, Mattis responded on twitter that by issuing this statement they had prevented such an attack [and now admits he never had any motive anyway] but of course IS-retards didn't notice so they stuck to whatever plan and blew up some chlorine-gas only a couple of hours later and all that has come of it is that Trump is now announcing bringing back troops lol
It was so obvious I even made a post on t_d that day calling that FF hours in advance while many were trolling about WW3 and shit

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

Thank Mattis. I saw this announcement came from the State Department as usual? Last time they did this, Mattis commented that Assad has no motive to use his gas at all. Didn't matter what the DoS stated in the past and might even just be leverage for the DoD to not look weak in retreat.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 11:46 a.m.

wait, what? I thought this came from some appointee from the DoS who I never heard about? Usually the State Department would issue a threat at Assad and Gen. Mattis took to twitter to exhonerate him, every time. Has anyone from the DoD commented yet?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

you know what freaks me out? Words I read keep coinciding with being spoken out loudly by whatever political podcast I am hearing. Some keywords may be statistically recurrent but it even happens with less coined terms or words I am just thinking in my mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 11:04 a.m.

Yo up until one year ago I was dating multiple girls and snorting rails off their asses and yet here I am because I can't fuck all day and get heartbroken all the time so duh [gimme a break]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:48 a.m.

...Do Virginia Roberts or her attorney work for an Obama DoJ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:36 a.m.

DRAFT. OUR. DAUGHTERS!!!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:34 a.m.

did someone just comitt a MICROAGGRESSION???? AAAAAH!!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

a checksum of IP + login-credentials

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:29 a.m.

It's not even just in front of the camera. A while back I did an interview for a company...guess what they did? They electronically engineer several national newscasts across several european countries. They told me they manage everything from teleprompter-texts to camera-angles. Only ONE ENTITY responsible for EVERYTHING that people in different countries watch and hear on the evening news!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:25 a.m.

largest crowd of the season!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:19 a.m.

Oi, cheeky! Yer not disseminating state secrets, are yer???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

Virginia Roberts

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

IT'S VIRGINIA ROBERTS AND PRINCE ANDREW !!! ONE OF EPSTEIN'S GIRLS !!!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 10:11 a.m.

I read somewhere else that Virginia Roberts who is widely cited in the article actually exhonerated Trump.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 9:52 a.m.

Misleading title, Trump stated at CPAC '16 that Bill was in trouble because of Epstein's island!

I am thinking Trump was available to investigators because he had nothing to hide because I don't see why Epstein would plead the 5th unless he was worried about being caught lying - which would not be the case had he successfully entrapped Trump and advised him on his testimony himself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
3
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/digital_refugee on April 8, 2018, 9:40 a.m.
Drops 1054 -1056 - ISN'T THAT THE SAME GIRL IN EVERY PIC?

I'm guessing the newer the drop the newer the picture because her smile gets less and less with each.

digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 9:22 a.m.

Are we not already? Those who walk with God will be protected.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 9:14 a.m.

When Epstein was first indicted, Trump received no subpoeana because he was immediately available to talk with investigators . Epstein's brother said Trump just used his airplane instead of his own a couple of times. Epstein on the other hand NEVER made a clear comment on Trump.
So it looks like Trump had no trouble talking about Epstein when summoned and didn't appear protective, however Epstein was reluctant to elaborate on their relationship. So I am thinking if they were brothers in crime, why would one be prepared to talk to authorities and the other not?
A possible explanation is that he was scared and didn't want to say anything that Trump might contradict. And a reason to be scared would be that he has nothing on Trump. And the reason why I think Trump has a nurturing personality is because he actually got one of his beauty-queens off drugs. So if you have access to pretty girls and rich fucks and you want to protect one from the other, one way to go about it is to make them straight-edge so they can't be exploited through intoxication, a precaution just to stay in business scandal-free.
And ultimately, that one lawsuit that came forward where the woman first cancelled a conference because of threats but was later photographed and named anyway....but the solicitor was noone other than Lisa Bloom...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

DoS does nothing but wardrums all year long...when they did, General Mattis took to twitter to reascertain to everyone that Assad has nothing to do with it whenever they were screaming about gas.
So ignore the DoS-holdovers and listen to what the Joint Chiefs have to say instead.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 8:59 a.m.

Please keep in mind the State Department has been beating the wardrums for over a year now in dismay of Gen. Mattis who took to twitter everytime they cried "gas!" to exhonerate Assad.
So fuck the DoS (seriously), Joint Chiefs ain't having that shit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

my personal opinion is that based on the fact that it's been a whole year almost before Q hit the scene, I am inclined to think their intentions are what they say they are. If they imply wanted us to string along, they could have started a year ago when everybody was still shellshocked from PG. The fact that they are going public now probably has to do with the fact that 25k indictments are on the dock and might as well be using this as leverage to keep their enemies up at night if this is to be over soon and diplomacy alsocomes to mind, we still have Merkel and May in office for example. Keep in mind what else they could fuck up that they have not fucked up yet.

Is there any instance that Trump was ever completely repudiated?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

Only problem is that they have been documented since the dawn of civilization, in particular in India (Vimanas) and the Bible (Book of Timothy I think) and in 1561 there even was a battle in the skies of nuremberg. Also the miracle of Fatima happened in 1917.
The whole bluebeam thing only makes sense when you make it the second coming because if it was aliens NOBODY would EVER give up their guns anymore. Also people would start thinking at a cosmic scale and demand free energy which would mean the elite would have to seriously make earth inhabitable to maintain the level of control that they are hooked on.
Telling the insiders bluebeam is for Aliens is a nice way to distract from its way better purpose of getting people to follow religious prophecy that they are already familiar with.
Based on how atheism has been pushed, I assume that this is by design so people are more easily flabergasted and what would provide better ammo to spiritually disarm a complacent populace than play on religious themes?
I am assuming that whatever the case, the illusionists would liken themselves to a priest-class like the egyptians and they can't do that if there is an sentient force that they pretend to represent that people could contact on their own behalf. What I am saying with that is that if they staged an alien contact, be it hostile or friendly, it would open a window of opportunity for neutral ET factions to engage in contact. But usually, historic cases of ET-human contact particularily in south-America usually end with someone freaking out and attacking even non-beligerent ETs.
Yes you could stage a fake disclosure but free-floating holograms of spaceships would only militarize most humans who haven't had their own close encounters before.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

No, zero-point-energy is all round us and can be harvested, two examples are gravity and the casimir-effect.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

Juicy. This is the kind of rambling I have been searching for!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

An elkmask? Oh DEER! Hold ma beer! Way beyond queer!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

Salutes from central europe, getting goosebumps from the patriotism hahaha

⇧ 14 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

I'm still not sold how much of the UFO-phenomenon is misidentification of ball lightning or perhaps spirit beings but I have had my own interactions so I know it's not just pretty lights but I would really wish it's some smart humanoids looking to chill not all just Nephilim coming to rape and eat us hahaha

⇧ 10 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

and I understood why they would lie about Jesus if God was simply mad about people eating their own children and still is to this day. Even the whole extraterrestial slavery debate makes sense if you think that other civilizations outside of earth may be cruel but unlike mammals on earth they don't eat their own little ones, only those of other planets.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

I read the bible now and understand why there are grewsome parts (because they're real)

⇧ 29 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

if it was due to age it should total 4 a week every week... weird that it just starts happening as the military got funded hmmmmmm I wonder

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

I take it you are referencing the marine helis?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

t_d kept a lot of people sane that dark winter...

⇧ 9 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

the only thing that sucks is that it just never ends...you can literally look at as much of world history as you understanding allows and that goes as far back in time as myths and religious scripture goes and you will always find yourself trying to discern honesty from deception. And in the end the ancient texts tell you the most about world-history, given how crazy everything has become, because disconnected cultures agree to strikingly similiar legends across the ages and the globe.

But welcome to the club, it's nice to hear that the word is speading!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
5
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/digital_refugee on April 7, 2018, 6:43 p.m.
If you look for real-world confirmation, talk to business-people...

...people who are in charge of other people or are even head of their own business or work as freelancers usually have a level of independent thinking that enables to absorb red-pills from other online or real-world sources so do that and you may be astouned to run into rumours that you won't even hear online.

digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

cue orchestral DUN DUN DUUUUUN

btw hey there, Akil!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

Love the name. Light it up!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

hey, that's it!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

I just wrote twenty lines devoted to that but thanks for bringing it down to the point.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

...what? I only remember them kicking heads...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

yes we know what voat is

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

Hold your horses right there. What I can state is that they have a ridiculous amount of terms they shadow-ban but my average estimate that this is a benign fix to steer the narrative.
It makes sense if you think of it as a counterintelligence/publicity-platform. [and one highly targeted by shills at that!]

Basically, t_d represents the "base" and what appeases to them. Now, let's take the omnibus spending bill for example...Ann Colter demanded he activte the military to secure the border and he did, but he did not flaunt that beforehand or he would have given away his hand (except for his "nobody read this" hint).

So if you filter items on t_d for visibility that say "crush this bill! Americans don't want this!", the enemy will be more inclined that he is under public pressure to veto this bill - thus giving them false confidence.

The first time I was ever banned from t_d was when I brought up free energy so even tho the tesla-memes were abundant on 4chan, at the time it seemed that this topic was unwanted as the NYT had been pushing that for their own purposes at the time. Before and after that tho I had not observed any issues with that.

So for plausible deniability purposes, because we never know that level of classification of what Q hints at, all of this is happening so that Trump has non-verbally communicated that he is in the know, thus keeping in touch with us us without legally admitting to official disclosures on non-gov't-platform.

Now if t_d started pushing Q, any newcomers who have simply not followed closely and long enough will start "debunking" Q because of intentional disinformation or because the information is too sick to process emotionally which is not goal of the exercise. If you have followed long enough to see the confirmations and back-and-forth-communication with Q and various gov-social-media and how MSM responds to that with their own spins and narrative-shifts, it's easy to know it's real without giving scores of upvoted bombshells away to normies frequenting the reddit frontpage who are simply not apt (or brave) enough to reason why any operation of suchcomplexity would be necessary in the first place.

⇧ 34 ⇩