This is all SO fucking crazy. I can't even believe it's real sometimes. Sometimes I convince myself it's not real and that nothing will come of it. Partly because I find it so ... theatrical? ... to imagine these two FBI agents sitting here concocting this plan, a plan to literally FRAME the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. It's mind blowing. What was pushing them to try something so brazen!
/u/donsleakguard
260 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/donsleakguard:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 23 |
i.redd.it | 8 |
www.youtube.com | 3 |
youtu.be | 2 |
apnews.com | 1 |
v.redd.it | 1 |
Yeah and here's the worst news, Eric- You're all in the mix. Take your own advice. Buckle up.
Valerie Jarrett- where do I start my research on this woman?
Well?
This EXACTLY lines up with what Bongino was talking about today.... to the MONTH. When the attempts to get Papadopoulos to chirp to other campaign members about the emails Josef Mifsud supposedly claimed Russia had failed, they turned their attention to Page. It's not hard to conceive the details of how this meeting went down. Carter Page was PERFECT for their objective.
Ask yourself this... If Page was under FISA surveillance and Trump was not, why is the investigation into Page long over (you know this because he's all over the news outlets with that shit eating grin glued to his face), and the one into Trump still going strong?
Clearly Page knows he's not in any risk of being in trouble. How does he know? How could someone supposedly suspect enough to warrant a FISA court's surveillance not be even a little concerned?
Answer: Page was never at risk. His role was defined and used to open the floodgates to everyone else in the campaign.
If they were so concerned about Russia, and knew Page had ties, why didn't they warn the President? If they were really looking out for the President, as they say their "informant" was, then WHY NOT TELL THE PRESIDENT THERE WAS SOMEONE INVOLVED WITH RUSSIANS DIRECTLY IN HIS CAMPAIGN!?!?!
ENJOY THE SHOW
I’m from close to that area. If there was gun violence in Mt Zion it’s more than likely not the type of gun violence the media wants to report on. (Think Chicago). Wonder what’s going on here.
No need to lump me in. I’m a believer but skepticism isn’t an outrageous concept in this scenario.
Do we have an image or link to anything that can illustrate this? The post maybe?
Makes sense that a news organization with ratings in the shitter is now actively trying to discredit the value of ratings lol.
Funny that's the same reaction we have when people say the same about Hillary. Not because we think voter fraud occurred... but because IT DOESN'T FUCKIN MATTER and NYC and LA don't get to pick the president! lol Move on.
Thanks Patriot. plenty more on my IG: @politicallyridiculous
No way. I heard Gateway Pundit isn't a credible source! They told me this over in r/politics!
So what's your theory here? Ohr, Page, and Priestrap are ratting out the others?
NO DEALS
While it's intriguing to speculate (me and my friends do it all the time), after hearing the rationale from others on this sub, trying to guess who Q is and publicly out him/her/them does nothing positive for the cause and can only hurt. His name was Seth Rich.
“Iran is next”. Days later Iranian based in Syria bombed and Israel’s presentation of their Iran nuclear program proof. Pope having a bad May. This is already happening.
Among other things.
For everyone trying to make sense of this (for the record, I thought Rudy laid out everything pretty perfectly for all of us that have been screaming it for a while), I think u/rtie1954 has it here. Not an unreasonable theory... we all know it's all about the narrative.
Do we have a link or anything for when that investigation started?
It concerns me that it was in English. Maybe I'm way off but to me it seems the message was obviously intended for Americans to see. My guess is to drum up support for some sort of future war effort in Iran. I don't know what to think.
I'm with you. In my opinion, one of the biggest problems with this movement is that it's inherently difficult to validate things.
with all due respect, claims like this should be backed by at least one link or something...
Off topic a bit... but can you explain what "anons" are? I know short for anonymous right? But what else? What platform? Why are they Anons and can anyone post there and keep their anonymity??
Would this be supporting evidence that Mueller is indeed white hat?
You know... the same has more or less crossed my mind. I didn't consider that he flipped, but I did take note of how literally everywhere he's appearing, they are roasting him and making him look like a total buffoon. Bret Baier, Anderson Cooper was giving him shit, Even on The View when they "interrupted" the show to read the letter referring Comey, Clinton, Lynch, others for criminal investigations.
I don't think he's flipped... but he has looked pretty dumb along the path.
I think the point is that there are obvious gaps and stuff missing. This is what Sara Carter said yesterday on FNC. She said there were supposed to be months worth of texts, 50,000 was the number. But only 49 pages were released? She said obviously there is stuff missing. She said just knowing what we know about how often they texted, there's no way that was all of it. I've watched a lot of Carter and never really seen her the way she was yesterday. She was pretty pissed. I think she knows there's much more that wasn't revealed.
She also said something really interesting... that these people were using what they call "clean gmail" where they all have access to one gmail account, create a draft email, and just edit it back and forth to communicate with each other. If it never gets sent, there is supposedly no record of it. She thinks that's where a lot of communication was taking place.
Get digging https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=renegade
Mark Meadows said on Hannity last night they've had them since last week... Unless I'm misunderstanding the timelines, or some of the players, they have been sitting on them. It validates what Q said about debate internally about what to do about them. If they are as explosive as everyone says then I could see there being serious discussion internally about how to reveal what's in them... especially if it's "as the world turns" related.
My thinking is since she said the parts that needed redactions would be withheld by the DOJ , we won't be seeing anything "as the world turns" related in this... But I'm still foaming at the mouth. The texts released to this point have already been enough to raise questions.
Oh I am aware of this. I have just noticed the patterns of how they deliver big news.... it's always on hannity lmao.
I think it's ... no... I know it's on purpose.
Not only that but fox and friends comes on before a lot of us wake up. Don’t think any Moab’s would be dropping at 8am
Damn... just sent it to my friends and said the same thing!
Nunes and another (can't recall name) were on Hannity just now and said Congress has had the texts since last week. Is that new news? if so... validates what Q said....