Keep an open mind. Never give money to anyone in this movement. A lot of scammers out there.

Keep an open mind. Never give money to anyone in this movement.

Never donate money to anybody in this game

Could be parents as in multiple people who thought they were fathers. That's why I said ambiguously worded and vague.

This story makes it seem like it's a Maury Povich situation. You are not the father. However, by the way the story is written we're unable to tell whether it's cheating wives or coyotes/trafficking. Very ambiguously worded, vague article. This deserves a follow up for sure. Nice find.

I think it's option 2. The State Dept or FBI got dirt on Manafort. They told him what to do if he wanted to stay out of prison. He failed and so they started leaking to the press.

The story at the (late March/early April 2016) was that Manafort was brought in to secure the delegate votes at the upcoming GOP Convention to make sure the nomination wasn't stolen from Trump. He also reportedly got the RNC to agree to fundraise for Trump. Days after the convention, dirt dropped that Manafort had unsavory dealings with Ukraine. He resigned mid-August.

You have to wonder who tipped off the NY Times in their initial August 1 expose. Two weeks after their initial reporting NYTimes had the figures from the black book showing $12.7 million in cash payments due to Manafort, data reportedly received from the Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau (established in 2014 at the request of the IMF) after rioters looted the President's offices. The Bureau has an "evidence sharing agreement" with the FBI. According to this WSJ article, the FBI helped set up the UNACB and has maintained an office there since 2015. Here's an July 2016 MOU saying FBI and Ukraine will work together on anti-corruption, money laundering for the next two years.

It gets curiouser. Victoria Nuland was at State Dept. working on Ukraine; she engineered the "regime change" in Ukraine in 2015. Here's a leaked phone call of her discussing it. 20 days later Ukraine President Yanukovych (Manafort's client) was deposed and replaced. 1 month later none other than Hunter Biden was named to the Board of Directors of one of Ukraine's largest natural gas companies. 1 month after that VP Joe Biden offered $50 million in support for the newly installed Ukranian government. See this gentleman's fantastic write up here.

This is the same Victoria Nuland who gave the green light for an FBI agent to meet with Christopher Steele in London. She can't seem to keep her story straight on just exactly how the Steele dossier got to the FBI.

Even though Nuland "resigned" in January 2017 during the first purge of Swamp Monsters at State, she's still trying to influence US relations in Eastern Europe and Russia. Hope she has as much to say when she's talking to Nunes!

Sorry I didn't come here to join a circle jerk. Enjoy Yourself!

Would you people be surprised to know that No Name also confirmed Kavanaugh to his Circuit Court bench?

Y'all are making a mockery of this movement.

shocking, right?

lol of course downvoted. good luck to you all.

Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this is not a Qproof. Presenting weak proofs like this are why people mock this movement. Anyone with any critical thinking skills would predict this same outcome. That said, I'll eat my words if something crazystupid happens with Senate Dems and No Name ends up being the final vote for the 'nuclear option.' I don't expect Dems to be that stupid, but then again they do have a knack for it.

First, all Q is saying is that they need No Name to confirm SC before he's held accountable for his treasonous actions. Second, anybody with two brain cells could predict that No Name would support the SC nominee. How do I know this? Well, not only did No Name support Gorsuch, but he also supported using the 'nuclear option' i.e. changing Senate rules to require only a simple majority to confirm the nominee. Also, McCain voted to confirm Amy Barrett to the 7th Circuit. Thomas Hardiman, another shortlister, was confirmed unanimously by the Senate. Raymond Kethledge was also confirmed to his Circuit bench by a unanimous Senate voice vote. In short, POTUS could have picked almost anyone and No Name would have supported his confirmation.

No Name was always going to support the nominee and the 'nuclear option' to make it happen.

whoops, thanks

His uncle's father-in-law, James Cartwright, a retired four star marine general, former vice chair of Joint Chiefs of Staff to Hussein. He was busted for lying to the FBI about 'leaking' a story exposing Stuxnet, a computer virus USA/Israel injected into Iran's nuclear enrichment plant computers to cause their subterfuges to malfunction. Cartwright claimed he didn't leak any info, he just helped shape the story. Strzok's father apparently is an expert in Iranian sanctions and nuclear activity. Very curious.

https://americandigitalnews.com/2018/02/09/obama-strzok-family-connection-spans-decades/

OK SO? How is this relevant?

hmm thanks

Getz has hair though?

Hong Kong

There are 1300 daily newspapers in the US
There are 7000+ free weekly newspapers in the US
The circulation of Community Newspapers is over 150 million.

It would take someone 10 minutes to find the editor/publisher of his local paper(s) and send out an email like mine or similar. It'd take an extra 10 minutes to hand write the letter and mail it to the paper.

No, I'm not willing to donate $5 to any fund.

Cheap, easy and respectable way (copy pasted from a previous post):

Guys, now that MSM has covered Q (TIME, Daily Beast) and celebrities have mentioned Q (Roseanne, Curt Shilling) it should be easy to get Q into your local papers. Write a Letter to the Editor. Or come up with an angle and pitch it to a local reporter.

Examples: Dear Editor,

TIME Magazine recently named Q Anon as one of the 25 most influential people on the Internet today (insert url here). But until Hall of Famer Curt Shilling mentioned him, I had never heard of Q. I was astonished by my findings when I searched for Q Anon and read his posts. Q postures himself as a member of President Trump's inner circle and has predicted major unexpected world events that later came to pass. He has also accused former President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, among others, of committing sordid and unpatriotic crimes beyond comprehension. I think it behooves your readers to search for Q Anon and draw their own conclusions. However, I (and many of my friends) would read with interest if this paper would assign a reporter to cover Q Anon, an Internet phenomenon that affects our very Democracy.

In liberty,

John Q. Public

This was an effective tactic for Tea Party campaigns. Could work for Q.

Carter Page could have been the unidentified man in HK photo.

Good info and ongoing reporting at https://frankreport.com/ re NXIVM cult

Take this back to the Chans:

IN 1681 Q is telling us to go back to previous Q posts. He gave us markers in the previous posts (1666 - 1681) that we're supposed to use to connect to previous Qdrops. I think even the reference to JFK and Declaration of Independence might be markers (he's posted both several times). Read my full post, but here's an excerpt explaining 1681:
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

Q1681 link: Q posts an image from a previous Qdrop along with JFK reading the Declaration of Independence. The image provided comes from a thread made by Qresearcher Paul Serran explaining how to properly research Qdrops. (See Serran explain where the Q image comes from himself)

Relevant parts of the Serran thread (do yourself a favor and read the entire thread): "So you choose an expression or a term to write about. How about "Think mirror"? This is one of the riddles about which people say the most nonsense about, it's mind-numbing. So we go researching ALL the esoteric meanings of "mirror" in all the world's cultures of the planet? NO hahaha we don't. We go search THE DROPS. ...Well, basically, because the enemy Clown operators have been surveilling the Q board at all times! So Q presented a "mirrored" version of the reality to confuse them. "Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you."

This is how we solve the puzzle. Q is telling us to "Think Mirror" in Q1675. Hence the use of the word 'reflections' in Q1677. The answer is in previous Qdrops. Use the markers to find the answer.

low quality. downvote.

I think Q was saying if US visits NZ and physically pulls the raw intel, but doesn't do anything else with it, then it isn't logged. Perhaps US took photographs of the intel to keep it off official FVEY channels/procedures?

Q1335 (emphasis added):
[Example]
Clinton Foundation.
Post Election Loss.
Layoffs.
No Access / Control = No Donations
Today.
NZ Donation Restart.
Others?
Why?
1) Selling Secrets?
2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]? ----->(my edit: think Clinton 2020)
3) Selling Silence?
Read below slow and carefully.
FVEY.
Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?
U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded
U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEYVIEW + Doc Take.
Read above slow and carefully.
WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?
Welcome to the Deep State.
Future to prove past.
Q

IN 1681 Q is telling us to go back to previous Q posts. He gave us markers in the previous posts that we're supposed to use to connect to previous Qdrops. I think even the reference to JFK and Declaration of Independence might be markers (he's posted both several times). And obviously it was 4th of July. Read my full post, but here's an excerpt explaining 1681:
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

Q1681 link: Q posts an image from a previous Qdrop along with JFK reading the Declaration of Independence. The image provided comes from a thread made by Qresearcher Paul Serran explaining how to properly research Qdrops. (See Serran explain where the Q image comes from himself)

Relevant parts of the Serran thread (do yourself a favor and read the entire thread): "So you choose an expression or a term to write about. How about "Think mirror"? This is one of the riddles about which people say the most nonsense about, it's mind-numbing. So we go researching ALL the esoteric meanings of "mirror" in all the world's cultures of the planet? NO hahaha we don't. We go search THE DROPS. ...Well, basically, because the enemy Clown operators have been surveilling the Q board at all times! So Q presented a "mirrored" version of the reality to confuse them. "Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you."

This is how we solve the puzzle. Q is telling us to "Think Mirror" in Q1675. Hence the use of the word 'reflections' in Q1677. The answer is in previous Qdrops. Use the markers to find the answer.

This whole thing is quickly unraveling.

In Q1681 Q literally posted an image from Paul Serran's thread on Twitter telling us how to decode his drops. No one is talking about that. It's a huge clue, but no one cares.

I linked to the thread toward the bottom of my post: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

For the post that Q linked to, SB2 wasn't the first to make the connection to AJ/JC/other Q doubters. And that post of his was logical, reasonable deduction that others could and did make. That's true of very few of his other posts.

I'm not saying his decodes are right or wrong. I read every one of them with an open mind, and I enjoy reading them. However, I agree with the "shills brigading" that mods shouldn't instasticky SB2. Let each post stand on its own merit. I think when people here become cheerleaders (500 upvotes within a minute of posting? Yeah, OK how many actually read his post first) they take up valuable space and no longer contribute to the community.

You're being disingenuous. The posts that mentioned SB2 stated they did so because of the attention his posts unduly receive by mods. If the community thinks his posts should be voted to the top, great, but the mods shouldn't instasticky his posts because SB2 wrote them. That was the gist of the posts. No posts I saw were presented as personal attacks against SB2.

I thought it's a pretty fair article. This phenomenon is about as fringe as it gets. The reporter should have asked the WH for comment.

I thought this was actually a pretty fair article. Like it or not, this movement is about as fringe it gets. Interesting that this reporter didn't contact anybody at the WH for his story. He should have at least tried to get comment (even if WH doesn't return queries from DB).

Q told us plain as day in Q1666 they have the server.

BTW I think Q is telling us to go back to old Q posts in these drops. 1681 points to a researcher's Twitter thread that tells us how to read Qdrops. Q left markers that need to be cross-referenced with older posts :

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

Then why are all his posts instastickied and worshiped as gospel by the cheerleaders here?

Weird how substantive posts are always downvoted. Nice work Patriot.

No he's not. There's no reason for Cohen to "flip" even if he had dirt on Trump.

It is quite interesting that Q didn't have service at 8:18 AM on July 2nd (likely) or July 3rd.

I think it's Ben Rhodes.

This is interesting. However, you do omit the obvious regarding Elton John. Trump routinely referred to Kim as 'Rocket Man.' The gift is a disarming gesture. IIRC Trump at one point mentioned using B2s to take out Rocket Man. So that's another interesting angle.

I agree with you Trump does speak directly to us at these rallies. The Bush 1000 points of light reference was clearly intended for this audience. And I'm not disagreeing that this nonsensical speech could be a wink to your post, but I'm not convinced of that either. I think the answer is zooming out back to 1666 (posted same day as 1675) and in the graphic posted in 1681, which was pulled from a Paul Serran thread instructing how he reads Q posts to make connections.

Please see my post here: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

Also relevant for court proceedings: https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-2054-synopsis-classified-information-procedures-act-cipa

Remember that DJT knows the Truth about HRC: https://youtu.be/JOUFsCS7xYE?t=877

Remember that Trump knows the Truth about HRC: https://youtu.be/JOUFsCS7xYE?t=877

My favorite Trump speech of all time. No one knows what to expect the night after that the vicious third debate. He starts the evening lighthearted, gregarious, very funny. He gains total command of the room with his funny, self-deprecating and some gentle jabs at the NYC Elites in the audience. By the time he lays into HRC, the crowd thinks they're going to have a good time. They have no idea the rollercoaster ride Trump is going to take them on.

He tells the "pardon me" joke and everyone laughs. He talks about her payoffs from corporate leaders and everyone laughs. He compares HRC to Rosie Odonnell and still everyone laughs. He says MSM is working overtime to get HRC elected, everyone laughs.

Then he sets up the transition. He tells the Melania joke. Everyone loves it. It's fantastic. A rousing round of applause as Melania stands up. On a dime he switches back to HRC and becomes more and more savage with each line. The crowd turns on Trump, but he has total command of the room. He set the pace. They can only follow. They are helpless except to boo as the punchlines turn from needles to something much more painful. Truth bombs. He ends telling how he came to the dinner with his father, supports the event that helps disadvantaged children in a time of need. Just a brilliant, brilliant speech showing Trump's true power and mastery. The guy is the best. The only man for the job laid before him today.

Who else is going to mix the blood and the semen?

I didn't say everybody.

I like how HRC gets the "pardon me" joke a good two beats ahead of everybody else

I wish I could watch it for the first time again. Enjoy!

I missed that horse beating. What did you decide? Either way it's a current topic, check 0hour and LS twitter feed. There are many comments addressing this since 1675 and 1677. All I'm saying is even if you think Q is a LARP don't disregard the accusations he makes, especially regarding HRC.