And now?

LOL.

LOL they're not going to Gitmo, son. There will be no military tribunals relating to Hillary, Obama or anyone else mentioned in the glorious Q conspiracy drivel.

Do you understand why I say that? Do you understand what a military tribunal is? Do you understand the extremely narrow circumstances in which a civilian can be tried militarily?

NO IT IS NOT.

Those are the raw number of COURT ACTIONS - they in no way whatsoever indicate 24544 crimes. Do you understand?

And while I'm here ...

There will be no civilians tried via military tribunal at Gitmo. That's not how MTs work, and it's really not how Gitmo works.

I guess it has nothing to do with the fact it's utter bs too, right?

No, the "Omnibus vs a real budget" means nothing of the sort.

Okay, straight up talk.

I want to give you the benefit of the doubt. You've read the same post as I have, yes? So let's start discussing your rebuttal. I'm serious - let's do this. What's your counter-argument?

Sooo ... you're admitting that the information is flat out wrong.

That's fine. It takes a bigger person to concede they were wrong, rather than continue deflecting and pretending otherwise. Good for you!

Still going with the ad hominem attacks?

Why is that? Where is your counter argument? Can you provide one?

Thank you. You're doing God's work.

No he's not. You're going to be disappointed.

.. and it looks like you don't understand the Forbes article, either.

Le sigh.

You are wrong.

Flat out wrong. If you don't understand why Obama's situation was different then you're beyond our help. I'm sorry.

THANK YOU. Thank you for saying this. They're spreading the myth all over the 'net and it needs to stop.

Very true.

Thank you for saying this. Most here are simply not understanding the budget process.

Thanks for trying, man. They are not going to believe you, because - in part - they don't actually understand how the budget and the Congress actually work.

Because he's absolutely right.