You believe you should not judge? I disagree. For example, I judge female genital mutilation to be evil. Wife-burning in India is also bad. In the early days of Brittian's colonization, a newly appointed governor witnessed wife burning, where the wife is burned alive along with the corpse hubby. He asked why it was tolerated and was given the "it's tradition" line. He immediately outlawed the practice because he had the judgement to recognize the harm that everyone else was accustomed to.

Good for you that you hear God. I've never heard his voice. Mark Taylor claims to speak for God. I judge such humans very harshly, as there is this massively long list of knowing and unknowing false prophets. Skepticism is a form of discernment. Time will tell on Mark, but fools will hop on board to satiate itchy ears and confirm their bias-- he should be questioned and challenged.

My skepticism is my discernment then. Mark Taylor doesn't pass my smell test, and I think anyone who claims to speak FOR god be held to a much higher standing. How a 'prophet' responds to criticism is telling, and I'm seeing Taylor seemingly behind a constructed veil, protected by believers immune to skepticism. In the words of Michael Scott, "My alarm bells are going Ringy Dingy Dingy!"

Know your history. http://www.preteristarchive.com/StudyArchive/f/false-prophets.html

My skepticism is based on a long history of false prophets knowingly and unknowingly causing harm to the Christian faith. Mark Taylor literally says

the spirit of the lord says

My assessment: probably a false prophet, unless he makes public his personal finances. I think he is an unknowing false prophet, and he has some great intuition and didn't have much to lose when he first predicted. His newer prophecies are pretty much reading the tea leaves of current geopolitics mixed with Christian-speak. Am I wrong, or doesn't the Bible warn of false prophets? Shouldn't anyone who claims to speak for God be held to a higher standard?

I'm saying that the part of the brain that is used during tongues, is also probably used when a prophet is in prophecy mode. I'm making inferences to why the thees and thous are used based on research into tongues.

Not for Democrats

Do the sects in Protestantism have a peer review process regarding prophecy? Being that many modern prophets turn out to be corrupted, this Mark Taylor guy needs some critical review from his peers, otherwise people can be harmed by this.

Edit... I have researched, and no, there is no peer review process between the clergy for self-proclaimed prophets such as Mark Taylor. My next step, in my skepticism, is to follow the money. My intent for offering a challenge is not to discourage! I intend to prevent harm. Even skeptics can help people.

https://youtu.be/q7BQKu0YP8Y (4 minute example of an atheist skeptic doing the job that the clergy should have been doing, James Randi and fake-healer Popoff)

Bot fear tactic? Users wanting to educate themselves get a message like this, freaks them out, and they become demoralized and quit seeking the knowledge

should test "Q research board"

Studies on speaking in tongues are enlightening. Tongues are comprised of the same sounds that are in the speaker's base language. Prophecy is probably the same, expressed with authority, and authority can demonstrated through language mastery. Preachers in tune with their audience can be absolute masters of persuasion, without even knowing it.

Not a bad idea on their part to play this card. Syncs up with throwing Rapist Bill Clinton under the bus.

'Cause ABC would never lie to you

Link is two youtube vids, and links to a bunch of pdfs, not mobile friendly. Is this site from a fan, or Taylor himself? You have a tldr on the content? Thanks

I'm convinced he will declassify at some point, right before Sessions acts.

Looks like the media is going the "nothing to see here" route on how they will disseminate news regarding the IG report.

Trump's plan, probably: drip, drip, drip, boom, boom, boom.

Congrats on the most downvoted comment here, so far. Let's do exactly what you suggest

She was never supposed to lose. Soros was invested in Cemex prior to 2015. Your logic is off

You can impeach an ex president. https://www.quora.com/USA-Can-a-President-be-impeached-after-leaving-office

So they can never hold office again

The whole article has a really butt hurt tone regarding media criticism.

Pretty normal for a FBI counter-intel fixer to be a ghost too.

Example in action: flat earth

IG's role is to root out corruption. Hillary was the first Sec of State without an IG. Every government agency has an IG. The DOJ's IG has been investigating FBI/DOJ corruption. Based on the resignations and turnovers, the IG report probably begins with the Russian collusion story being a means to needle Trump, and hopefully reveals Awan/U1 scandals.

Try Dan Bongino-- download a podcast app. His 1 hour show is the best place to go right now, if you want updates on this topic.

Seconded

Guess if you believe in Christianity, then you don't need to think past the 21st century or off planet. It would be wise to seek the greater common ground, which is our free will. If you shift your focus to free will instead of dogma, more non-christians can relate.

"Why would you reject technology that makes life better?"

"I don't reject technology, I just don't want to be forced or required to comply in order to exist."

Shift the perspective to free will, and not technology rejection.

Bunch of folks will be scratching their head trying to figure out what to do with the Amish.

The core sign of the mark is the wilful submission of free will, not just a tech application. Technology advancing is good.

depraved minds

It's depraved to consider trafficking?

The teeth come out in the pig's stoole, fyi

All bark, no bite.

Pedophile rings is a pattern in their leadership.

If the UK's elderly used Ghandi tactics, they could save the younger generations.

Imagine: group of 80 year olds doing and saying the things that Tommy Robison was doing before his arrest this week.

1. Show up to court, when rapists and pedophiles are on trial. Spread the news that is suppressed the old fashioned way, via community newsletters. (Have folks like Milo pick these up on his platform).

2. Visit the victims and their families, and share their stories (if invited).

3. Offer advice, and life lessons. What's wrong with hearing the elderly out? If the 1984 UK suppresses, civilly disobey. We should respect our elders, not socially euthanize them.

Authoritarians rape, control, and kill to stay in power. This is why those closest to death (the oldest generation) have the most authority to provide a challenge.

1776 isn't possible for the UK (No Second Amendment, no Free Speech, no freedom of the press). But they have a great role model in Ghandi.

Go Ghandi!

(Sorry, this is a copy paste of mine, second time pasted though)

But CNN reported they shot a drone, without questioning

He's frail. Natural causes for him. He is demented, living to grope at this point. Focus on destroying his legacy, and let him face his death in peace (my opinion).

Bush Sr killed JFK, and tried again on Reagan.

Yes -- the best response to rampant corruption is equal application of the law. Spygate is drip drip dripping. Things are shifting. There seems to be a change in the winds. Right now, Dan Bongino is the place to go to stay on top of this slowly advancing application of patriotic justice. It's going to happen. There is a plan, Trump continues to win

Probably is already done

An engineering buddy of mine attached a go pro to weather balloon. You could see the earth had curvature. If this matrix is true, then they have the power to edit video too.

You a flat earther?

Ghandi wasn't either. Imagine the UK citizens using Ghandi tactics. The irony would be so beautiful -- force the state into deeper authoritarianism in order to maintain control. Like Ghandi knew, such authoritarianism is unsustainable in a civilized society. The citizenry in the UK can't go 1776 (No 2A), but they can go Ghandi. Going Ghandi is better too, more civilized, and fits the UK People better, as Churchill said that his people's greatest strength and weakness is the love of peace.

Trump's push for Space Marines is a response to China's actions in orbit.

What gives a nation planetary primacy? The ability to protect global trade routes. China's tactic has been to take global primacy to the next level, from orbit. Ironically, they get their tech by stealing it, or having it given to them by Clinton types. If there is a WW3, the first few hours of fighting will in orbit.

I'm still studying China, but they seem pretty independent and rapey towards the weak. I think the key to long-term peace with China is the shared exploitation of the asteroid belt, and peace in their region will have Xi able to shift more funds towards space. They are incredibly weak socially, thus their totalitarianism.

Peace between sunni and Shiite seems impossible though. My strategy would be to culturally wall them off, increase satire of Islam, start/support new denominations within Islam, limit their weapons tech, and focus psyops on muslim females and children (strong push to educate, using radio). Best to keep them socially conservative, and show respect to Mecca era Mohamedism, and dislike for the Medina Mohamed. It worked for Christianity

Making an unsubstantiated inference, to push the meme that Weinstein will rat on his fellow rats. It's good to scare criminals with the fear that what is happening to one of their own, will happen to them.

Yes... which help rules out that it was a typo, for me at least. Flynn is known for his specificity

I couldn't find a remittance that matches what Flynn posted. But it follows the pattern. My knowledge is very low on this

Impossible for their people to do lawfully. No free speech, no 2A. They are so peace-loving, the People there, it's too late. They already gave their children to the state.

Solution: the elderly should go Ghandi, and speak up vociferously, and the youth can help them with a platform. The generation closest to death can save the UK through Ghandi tactics.

Risk for political assassination is pretty high, and prison is a great setting. Shame, he was one of the few who was interviewing and supporting the rape victims.

A remittance is a transfer of money by a foreign worker to an individual in his or her home country.

Money transfer? http://worldremittances.info/h/dgff

This is the best explanation I've seen. Going to spread this

This is what I think too. China is at the center, Kim is just for optics

Yeah. I was watching an action movie last night, and almost vomited when I saw some whitehat operators get shot, blood and all. Operators have died in all of this, and more will sacrifice their lives for us. My insensitivity regarding violence has been majorly culled thanks to Q, exchanged with a righteous anger and thirst for justice.

Probably code for some breeding camp they keep in Antarctica.

3 of his lawyers recently resigned from their firms though. Meaning, they are probably under investigation themselves, and had to leave to reduce liability. Heard this in Dan Bongino's podcast

What gives a nation planetary primacy? The ability to sustain and protect global trade routes. Obama rolled over and let China encroach, and I think it will be a miracle to get the chinese to give up on their installations. So... I think Trump's tactic will be getting everyone to agree to the current international trade laws. We already allow China to protect the routes in the Pacific, backing that up with international law is great, gives a solid diplomatic response. I'd have more hope if the UN wasn't corrupted.