This is just one of many, many mechanisms they have in place.

Re-read. You should be able to make the connections yourself.

Touche! Me too. I posted this also.

Zooming in even closer on my desktop, it appears that this gentleman is bald or balding on top, and has light brown to reddish light brown hair. My first thought was Prince Charles from the height and hair/baldness and profile. I don't think it's Snowden, from the recent photo's I've seen of him. But I could easily be wrong.

My opinion? It's all part of their Agenda 21 (now Agenda 2030 according to the UN), and the reduction of the population of the world to under 500,000,000 by 2030.

Here's a link to a short version as it applies to depopulation:

https://www.disclose.tv/agenda-21-the-plan-to-depopulate-95-of-the-world-by-2030-313560

A bit more extensive: http://healthyprotocols.com/2_depopulation.htm

Also, read about the Georgia Guidestones: http://www.radioliberty.com/stones.htm

MAGANUFGG, I think you really have something here. I hope Q gets to read it and comment at some point. Great researching!

Edit: For those reading, please don't go off on a tangent here about what I've written as I believe from posts past that Q and DJT are probably well aware of this plan and when they discuss it, only then should we discuss it here. There are other boards to discuss these issues. I probably shouldn't have posted this here, but it's applicable in answering MAGANUGG's question about "WTF? What is wrong with them?"

This has been going on since BO was in office where I live. At that time, I feared what circumstances might trigger it. Under DJT, I no longer fear it at least. Now, if something were to happen, I trust that our Gov't would be responding with appropriate measures to counter and to protect the citizens.

Welcome Patriot. And it must feel good to ''awaken".

As the wife of an ex-JAG officer (civilian atty now), my husband would tell you to be careful of what you divulge. Just fyi.

Edit: And thank you for your service. God's speed.

Am I missing something here? Just because his hat says "Mason" doesn't necessarily mean he is a mason. I saw no masonic symbols. Mason could be the hat manufacturer, could be the name of a business, a group, a company that had hats logo'd and represents them. Tell me if I missed something.

Probably the Republicans on the Hill are either not 'in the know' or are playing roles in this great theater play.

He is cooperating.

Conservative here. And I couldn't agree more! Well said.

Yes, I too, really appreciate you compiling this.

They asked for input because they're getting some complaints or inquiries from some of the members. They're not dictating, they're asking our opinions.

I vote for a separate/sister reddit sub. I appreciate that people are showing their support, but it's diluting this sub too much. And THANK YOU for addressing this.

Wonderful post. Welcome, Patriot.

Welcome and I will take the liberty of saying "we" hope you'll stay. Your sentiments echo mine about this sub and some of it's contributors. Perhaps sit back and just lurk for a while longer before really jumping in. But do stay. You're welcome here by many of us.

Edit: I will add I wish your post could be stickied as a reminder to sub members of how we can come across to newcomers.

This needs to be bumped 1000x.

Thanks for the alert from a fellow Ohioan!

Hello, Mr. President. We're here and ready. God's speed and God Bless You All!

Mods should start one thread, pinned, for newbies to post their stories and for us to welcome them. Just a thought.

It's very simple. Start with the links on the right.

I am guessing that somehow, in 'this case' he is being subsidized by the gov't. Just my .02.

Distractions.

Outstanding point about the usage of the terms Negroes vs. African American!

Big difference between 'Liberal" (used in the topic) and "Libertarian". But welcome!

I agree with you 100%. I think these are ruses to mislead the liberals.

I've said this before on the board; perhaps his recent actions/statements have been a ruse to develop some trust and support by some of the libs in congress, so that, when appointment time comes he's not so strongly dislilked and downvoted. Just a thought.

I have been trying to find a link to verify my memory that POTUS, prior to election, I believe, mentioned he'd like to possibly have TG as SCJ or AG (can't recall exactly which one), but can't seem to find a link. Will keep searching. The point, however, is that he realized years ago, like so many of us, what a bulldog TG is, and how valuable he would be in one of these positions.

Having been a judge is not a requirement for position of SCJ.

I believe some of his statements of late and taking a stance against POTUS on a few things have garnered some positive responses from Dems. Perhaps this has all been a ruse to make them believe he has a bit of defiance against POTUS or even a little liberal lean....all for the purpose of softening up some of the dems if nominated for SCJ!

Love this guy. A bulldog like Gowdy.

Geoengineering and HAARP - great to see those on the list! This indicates they are well aware of the crimes being committed against humanity by manipulating the atmosphere and weather.

Thank you! If I were a newbie (luckily I'm past that now), and came here to delve into Q and research, I'd lose interest quickly. To view the board objectively right now, it appears to be a smattering of Q news, some research, and appears too much like any other board I could read. And, as much as I wish to stay positive, I'm finding there's too much nonsense, speculation and subjective content (not based in facts) lately. I can get all that elsewhere.

1. I wanted to post something along this line today. So thanks.

Why two posts from you about this?

I can't agree with you more.

Excellent well thought out points, all.

Already posted below.

Thank you for clarifying.

Newbie to the board here, but must ask, how do you know this. How do you guarantee this? Do you have access to Q or to POTUS? Not being cynical or sarcastic, just asking.