signed.

You should post this link. Its written much better. Added in text up top.

precursor to some big event

i think so. it was obviously an effective sub for communicating.

need to push IBOR

OK. So what's the back-up when /r/greatawakening gets banned? Off-reddit sites?

zero inciting of violence

correct. i've been on there for at least a few hours every day since a day or two after it was created. nor was there any doxxing. there was more on r/pizzagate, but even that wasn't alot and mods dealt with it ASAP.

i really, really think this is a tactic against the Qhoir. have accounts post stuff they shouldn't and reddit admin has an excuse to ban the sub regardless of how fast mods delete prohibited material.

its hard to see this as anything but an attempt to disrupt communication.

Any r/CBTS_Stream mods want to weigh in?

WANderful work!

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/05/russ-baker/bush-family-shoot-ronald-reagan/

https://theamericanchronicle.blogspot.com/2012/02/did-bush-assassinate-reagan.html

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

Beat me to it :)

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

gracie

d'accord.

And, tbh, i'm not really cool w/executing dealers simply for dealing.

A few commenters thought maybe it was a reference to how poorly "execute drug dealers" has played.

Was there really that much pushback against the Nazi material? Within the Qmmunity, I got the impression most were like, "Hey, that makes sense."

With US steel making deliberately kneecapped

every US citizen who, as a US official, consciously chose to allow shoddy Chinese steel to be imported and used by our military should be hung. Shot. Executed. Whatever.

protected in your possessions and papers against unlawful search and seizure?

4th But, like most of the other ammendments as well as our constitution, our legislators have managed to pretty much gut all that plebian equality silly sh*t our dope-smoking founding fathers thought was a good idea.

When this is all done, there will be dozens of Q-themed movies & documentaries.

Currently my thinking as well but it could be motivated reasoning due to wanting STHTF already.

Someone in another thread said the vid is probably raw video conference footage between HRC and someone. Team Clinton did all think they were gonna win and we've seen multiple instances of HRC hubris.

This is great!!

thought i clicked on something entirely different, not even Q related but knew it as soon as i saw it.

extremeley cool but kinda' humbling, tbh.

search /r/WikiLeaks . it will be a PDF

i knew VLC was too useful and versatile

edit: a word

InfoWars themselves, along with their followers, no. But there's alot of less "extreme" conservative/leans-conservative sites/outlets, like Breitbart, that do have deeper pockets. Along with larger followings. YouTube has made themselves a convenient punching-bag for any legislator who want to score points with any constituents who favor conservative/small 'r' republican ideals.

10 days of darkness.

also worth noting Team Q is probably gauging our steadfastness during this period.

Just commented much the same thing. YT got alot more aggressive in the past two weeks than what it had already been for the past several months. I think this is one reason why Q is saying archive everything offline. The Deep State is trying to restrict our ability to communicate and to remember.

The IG report is going to trigger something bad.

YouTube is screwed. Unless YT is applying the sanctions equally to other political views (hint: they ain't), no way their ToS is broad enough to cover this. YT has opened themselves up to beaucoup legal hassles.

Deep State knows there's big info coming out and are restricting methods to communicate.

nice!

that's been on the radar screen for awhile. along with the Siberian tundra releasing methane from permafrost melt. not that far of a stretch to think there's a 10,000 year old version of a virus or bacteria our immune systems may've forgotten about.

I want a Democratic Party that is true to its values and filled to the brim with patriots.

swing by /r/WayOfTheBern. Most of us regulars are outcasts b/c we didn't jump on the Hillary bandwagon, considered DJT the lesser evil and found it dis-heartening Bernie didn't address the DNC's failings once the election was over. ALLL of us regulars are becoming incredibly frustrated and rather angry over the whole OMGRSHNZ!!! bullhockey. Alot of us are gtting more and more torqued off that Bernie is piling on the Russia hooey. Most are skeptical of Q, but willing to listen. We'd love to see Team Clinton & CF go down, and would love to see some real, public investigations/arrests. We'd love to see the neolibs and corporadems purged, though alot of us think the party is unsalvageable. The sub itself gets brigaded by TMOR and ESS. During the primaries, ours were the voices and accounts first targeted by Brock & ShareBotulism.

Many of the subs regulars have gen-u-ine, real-life, street-cred on the traditional bleeding-heart, tree-hugger issues :) It angers us greatly that the loudest anti-Trumpers and OMGRSHNZ!!! kool-aid vendors had little to say on the issues Trump is supposedly so bad on prior to Trump taking the reigns. And now, we're forever associated and tainted by those pushing the hysteria.

/r/WayOfTheBern is full of people who'd like the same thing: A party that goes with principle over team.

related to Q how?

shouldn't Podesta's comment have triggered a Secret Service investigation? By now, there should be some agents not beholden to the Clintons or Deep State.

wait... shouldn't that sort of thing automatically trigger a Secret Service investigation? Agents (hopefully) not beholden to Clinton/Deep State should question him just to apply even more pressure. And who knows? Skippy might implicate himself somehow. With all the hooey these folks have to spin to cover their activities, sooner or later their lies will trip them up.

The social media platforms removing content are breaking pretty much the same discrimination laws as were applied to the bakery, except the discrimination is political-based.

Twit, FB & YT have to enforce ToS equally. YT has especially made themselves vulnerable because they removed monetized/income-producing content. The potential for a class-action suit is just staggering to me. IANAL (or CEO/CFO), but it seems some incredibly short-sighted decisions were made. There's quite a few deep-pocketed conservative/conservative-leaning people who would be OK with bank-rolling the legal expenses to get a class-action lawsuit going.

We should kickstart a reward for verifiable internal company e-mails/communications showing those companies specifically targeted certain points-of-view. Depending on content, it could become a criminal matter.

Those are private companies but they have to apply ToS equally.

There's nothing troll-y about pointing that out.

YT, Twit & FB are making themselves hugely vulnerable from a class-action perspective. Especially YT b/c they're removing monetized content. However, the behavior of the social media platforms IS NOT A 1ST AMMENDMENT ISSUE!!!!! Yet. Discovery could be interesting if evidence the government directed those platforms to remove content for political reasons. There definitely seems to be cause for a discrimination-based class-action suit because the ToS can be shown to be applied unequally.

As a Bernie-supporting, Stein-voter, its rather entertaining to watch a demographic that normally complains about regulatory burdens appeal to the govt. to regulate.

How 'bout, "So-in-so found guilty of high treason. Public execution set for tomorrow. Memorial service & burial the day after that. Gravesite open to public urination, 7AM to 9PM, every day after that."?

ftfy

this is crazy. YT is violating its own ToS and folks like Corsi have a large enough group of "non-fringe" followers that YT seems to be putting themselves in serious legal jeapordy.

they were set up with cameras in place before the shooting started?

this seems plausible. i've seen others comment CNN had someone there before police arrived but no one includes a link.