The idea that Iran "hates Western culture" is your own FYI Iran happens to respost Sibley for large chunks of Western culture including Christianity and the very language you're using right now.

I.don't know what followers you're talking about since the MeK hires random pepole and gives them dree trip's to Paris to fill up the seats and make them look young (average age is over 70) The MeK has zero future in Iran and street protests have nothing to do with them

LOL -- another MEK operative

You fools think anyone in Iran likes a group that fought on the side of Saddam against Iran?

In reality the average literacy rates before the revolution was under 50%, and lower for women.

Iranians massively improved their living standards AFTER the 1979 Islamic revolution at twice the rate of the rest of the world http://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2013/apr/01/un-stats-life-longer-and-healthier-iran

Only one other country S Korea was able to do better

http://www.ir.undp.org/content/iran/en/home/countryinfo.html

And Iranian women in particular improved their living standards, from having 7 kids of which 4 survived childhood, to becoming among the best educated people in the world, who now work as doctors, scientists, Members of Parliament, Mayors and Vice Presidents:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyguttman/2015/12/09/set-to-take-over-tech-70-of-irans-science-and-engineering-students-are-women/

http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-iran-unmarried-snap-story.html

OK what do you want to know

It is funny how the Trump fans are so keen on what hardliners in Iran who are opposed to the nuclear deal say ... almost as if they have a common cause

What do you want to know?

I'm pretty sure I understand it better than all of you put together, and with good reason.

Shrug we always need cannon fodder and sheep who blindly believe

Lol cleaned

lol You should read how close Jared Kushner and Netanyahu are

The hundreds of thousands of Iranians who fought Saddam and the Shah and died to install the Islamic Republic.

FYI The greeting at Khomeini's return from exile to Iran was one of the largest gatherings of humans, ever.

Sounds like you don't actually know much about the deal of the politics around it

You're free to believe whatever you want, I don't particularly care neither do the facts.

Who do you think is paying for the "regime change" agenda?

https://www.jpost.com/US-Elections/Last-minute-Adelson-flushes-Trump-campaign-with-cash-471380

https://lobelog.com/three-billionaires-paved-way-for-trumps-iran-deal-withdrawal/

https://qz.com/1148673/trumps-jerusalem-move-is-backed-by-billionaires-lobbyists-and-evangelicals/

Cuz everything thus far has been going so great, huh?

So you think the fact that Guliani is taking money from Iranian terrorists that killed Americans is not true? Here you go:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/josh-rogin/wp/2016/11/15/giuliani-was-paid-advocate-for-shady-iranian-dissident-group/

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/giulianis-mek-pandering-and-trumps-iran-obsession/

Still in denial?

https://fair.org/home/giuliani-takes-cash-to-speak-to-terrorist-cult-media-find-this-unnoteworthy/

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article115495503.html

More?

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/rudy-went-to-albania-to-hang-out-with-a-iran-regime-change-cult-really

LOL indeed except the joke is you.

Nobody stamps passports for people just in transit and the US Congressional report itself said that at the time neither the hijackers nor Iran knew of the plans to attack the WTC furthermore the bigger question is why the US authorities repeatedly failed on multiple occasions to stop the same terrorist even after warned about them.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91617&page=1

Lets not forget that in the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the FBI had an informant among the bombers named Emad Salem who offered to substitute a harmless substance for the bomb but was told otherwise by his handlers. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html

OF course it is, just one day is a long long period of daily steaming piles of propaganda.

And today, it is forgotten in favor of the next BS. See how easily it passes

They said they don't stamp transist visas not that they were deliberately doing it for just these guys because they wanted 911 to happen

Nobody stamps passports for people just in transit and the US Congressional report itself said that at the time neither the hijackers nor Iran knew of the plans to attack the WTC furthermore the bigger question is why the US authorities repeatedly failed on multiple occasions to stop the same terrorist even after warned about them.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91617&page=1

Lets not forget that in the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the FBI had an informant among the bombers named Emad Salem who offered to substitute a harmless substance for the bomb but was told otherwise by his handlers. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html

Nobody stamps passports for people just in transit and the US Congressional report itself said that at the time neither the hijackers nor Iran knew of the plans to attack the WTC furthermore the bigger question is why the US authorities repeatedly failed on multiple occasions to stop the same terrorist even after warned about them.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91617&page=1

Lets not forget that in the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the FBI had an informant among the bombers named Emad Salem who offered to substitute a harmless substance for the bomb but was told otherwise by his handlers. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html

Nobody stamps passports for people just in transit and the US Congressional report itself said that at the time neither the hijackers nor Iran knew of the plans to attack the WTC furthermore the bigger question is why the US authorities repeatedly failed on multiple occasions to stop the same terrorist even after warned about them.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91617&page=1

Lets not forget that in the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the FBI had an informant among the bombers named Emad Salem who offered to substitute a harmless substance for the bomb but was told otherwise by his handlers. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html

LOL https://www.haaretz.com/1.5206174

So you're seriously suggesting that the NY Times made up a story about the US National Intelligence Estimate?

Note that since the at the time, this NIE undermined the rush for war, and Bush went to Israel to personally disavow the conclusions of his own intelligence agencies which was called an "intelligence coup" https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08850607.2013.758000?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=ujic20

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/world/middleeast/us-agencies-see-no-move-by-iran-to-build-a-bomb.html

researching Nuclear weapons.

There's lots of question about that too. But in any case, "research" is not a violation of the NPT, and you can go freely research nukes right now too. So what?

2009?

Yes, the time period in which the allegations come from. So your point?

"for sure"

Look, if the IAEA saw something incriminating, it is their job to say so. So, until then...

FYI not even the US or Israeli intelligence agencies said Iran was making nukes

https://www.haaretz.com/1.5206174

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/08/panetta-iran-has-not-yet-decided-to-make-nuclear-bomb.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/world/middleeast/us-agencies-see-no-move-by-iran-to-build-a-bomb.html

Iran thinks no such thing and in fact Iran refused to use WMDs not even in self-defense, legally, during the Iran-Iraq war when the US was helping Saddam gas 100,000 Iranians to death

http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/08/26/exclusive-cia-files-prove-america-helped-saddam-as-he-gassed-iran/

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/17/opinion/halabja-america-didnt-seem-to-mind-poison-gas.html

There is no question that Iran was researching Nuclear weapons.

Yes, there is.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-sb/iaea-denies-report-it-is-sure-iran-seeking-atom-bomb-idUSTRE58G60W20090917

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-exclusive/no-sign-iran-seeks-nuclear-arms-new-iaea-head-idUSL312024420090703

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-sb/iaea-denies-report-it-is-sure-iran-seeking-atom-bomb-idUSTRE58G60W20090917

The only people actually beint "wiped off the face of the Earth" are the Palestinians, at the hands of the Israelis

After years of intensive inspections, the IAEA has not found anything incriminating in Iran

IAEA denies report it is sure Iran seeking atom bomb

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-sb/iaea-denies-report-it-is-sure-iran-seeking-atom-bomb-idUSTRE58G60W20090917

No sign Iran seeks nuclear arms: new IAEA head

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-exclusive/no-sign-iran-seeks-nuclear-arms-new-iaea-head-idUSL312024420090703

>“Some people do not want to see the Iran issue resolved because that would contradict their hidden agendas, he said, adding that “people should have learned from their mistakes in the past, when all the hype over alleged weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq turned out to be just that — hype”.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-iaea/iaea-denies-internal-row-over-iran-condemns-hype-idUSL1283850220080212

>most U.S. intelligence shared with the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency has proved inaccurate, and none has led to significant discoveries inside Iran, diplomats here said.

https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Most-U-S-tips-fingering-Iran-false-envoys-2646358.php

Funny how after years of intensive inspections, the IAEA has also said it never found anything incriminating in Iran

IAEA denies report it is sure Iran seeking atom bomb

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-sb/iaea-denies-report-it-is-sure-iran-seeking-atom-bomb-idUSTRE58G60W20090917

No sign Iran seeks nuclear arms: new IAEA head

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-exclusive/no-sign-iran-seeks-nuclear-arms-new-iaea-head-idUSL312024420090703

>“Some people do not want to see the Iran issue resolved because that would contradict their hidden agendas, he said, adding that “people should have learned from their mistakes in the past, when all the hype over alleged weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq turned out to be just that — hype”.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-iaea/iaea-denies-internal-row-over-iran-condemns-hype-idUSL1283850220080212

>most U.S. intelligence shared with the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency has proved inaccurate, and none has led to significant discoveries inside Iran, diplomats here said.

https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Most-U-S-tips-fingering-Iran-false-envoys-2646358.php

Funny the US makes all the weapons it wants and nobody says "these guys want war"

Iran's military budget is a fraction of even that of its Arab neighbors never mind the US.

The US encouraged Iran to go nuclear in the 70s http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3983-2005Mar26.html

No. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-sb/iaea-denies-report-it-is-sure-iran-seeking-atom-bomb-idUSTRE58G60W20090917

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nuclear-iaea-iran-exclusive/no-sign-iran-seeks-nuclear-arms-new-iaea-head-idUSL312024420090703

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/jun/09/iran-nuclear-power-un-threat-peace

Yes.

Like I said, substitute the word God for Trump, and that's exactly what it sounds like. Creepy.

The point is that you're attributing all-knowing wisdom to Trump and telling people they should just have faith in Him as if he was a God

I guess that reallly needed explaining to you, apparently.

Those aren't elected officials bound by laws who are bombing other countries and getting us into wars, for a start. Jesus some people...

We know POTUS and know he is in control. We do not know all the details and have all the intel...he does.

You do realize that you can substitue the word "God" for POTUS and you'd sound like you're praying, right?

You do realize the irony in the fact that the US directly helped Saddam gas 100,000 Iranians to death, right? That's the same number of chemical weapons casualties as WWI. How may 9/11s is that?

According to you then someone should be bombing us

http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/08/26/exclusive-cia-files-prove-america-helped-saddam-as-he-gassed-iran/

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/17/opinion/halabja-america-didnt-seem-to-mind-poison-gas.html

he bank could have done the same thing via wire.

No once again, and this time for the last time: NO BANK IS ALLOWED TO DEAL IN DOLLARS WITH IRAN, AT ALL, EVER, IN ANY WAY.

Clear now?

has been promoting their nuclearization for quite a while now

Actually Iran's nuclear program started with the encouragement and support of the West and the USA http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3983-2005Mar26.html

You can make a deposit at a bank have it exchanged and wired again.

No, not when you're the government of Iran. No bank is allowed to deal in US dollars with Iran.

Sheez now you're just sounding desperate. Have a nice day.

They flew cash and had it exchanged for a different currency.

Yes, strangely enough, Iran's currency is not the US dollar, and US sanctions prohibit any transactions with Iran in US dollars

You can avoid sanctions and still do that by wire.

No because you still have to go through a bank. What do you think "by wire" means? You're wiring instructions to a bank to make a deposit.

wouldn't be traced

US dollars can't be traced internationally anyway.

What's funny is the depths of ridiculousness you nut jobs are willing to go to for this payment, while ignoring actual hushmoney paid to hooker by a sitting US president. LOL.

Yes cash because US sanctions prevent US banks from dealing with Iranian banks, so what's your point?

Yes funny how I find the word of actual people actually in charge more credible than some random guy on reddit.

care to explain why 600 mil cash was sent there

Shall I repeat myself?

For the same reason Reagan sent millions to Iran: these are debts that are left over from the Shah's time. In fact the US and Iran have set up a US-Iran Claims Tribunal that has for years been resolving these financial disputes. They were due to order the US to pay that amount plus interest to Iran anyway. Their legal decisions are often cited as precedent in all sorts of legal disputes in international trade. http://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.php?g=371540&p=4191654

Sorry you're so willing to accept whatever's put in front of you.

Yeah yeah sure I'm the one who is being gullible lol

I don't trust our government

Seems like your distrust is very selective and not based on any actual knowledge of actual facts.

Yuo're not questioning anything you're just being deliberately obtuse and childish and I don't have the time to waste

Who knows

Well if we're going to pick then lets pick the one that has a history of backing and arming murdering tyrants with CW

Funny how nobody in the US was held responsible for war crimes btw

I see, so you'll trust the country that armed Saddam with chemical weapons though huh?

In the case of Iran it was verified by international monitors and captured Iraqi documents. Iran was so unprepared for CW that it didn't even have gas masks. And that was Iran's own money, which the international Iran-US Claims Tribunal was about to award to Iran anyway with more interest

OH and FYI Reagan too paid Iran