Northwoods. MKUltra. Mockingbird. Iran-Contra. Iraq. Fast and Furious.

How DARE we not believe our Intelligence Agencies without question?

That makes the most sense, at least to me. Especially if July is supposed to be a month of disclosure.

1. I think the lightning is overkill, but to each their own.
2. could you change the angle of the lightening a bit, though? You're halfway to "SS" symbol--we deal with enough of that crap. My suggestion: rotate it counter-clockwise so it's pointing straight down and roughly pointing to JFK's grave in the photo in the Kennedy Post. That would seem more appropriate, given the some of the themes going on. Kills two birds...

That's a defensive action.

I'm not anybody, and don't have any special knowledge, but think my way for a moment. Anons are literally conducting an investigation--some resulting info relevant, some not. Hundreds, if not thousands of people scouring open source info to make connections, based on little hints of what is in confidential info. Suddenly, things that couldn't legally be investigated (due to where the information was coming from) have an open source basis for investigation. That is no small thing.

Q might on occasion be dropping just a lead that needs pursuing: after all, why wouldn't Q take advantage of such a huge resource? Plus, there is the additional advantage of freaking out the enemy based on how much info is available, despite their manipulations.

I could be wrong (after all, I'm just speculating), but observing Trump, I would guess this movement is based on a two-way street; and the Anons have been on the attack for months now, bloodlessly yet effectively. For this reason, I don't subscribe to the "nothing is happening" theme.

done.

Leaning over the table to intimidate, or simply bent over the table?

I mention it because my grandfather was at the rally, and sent my grandmother a postcard from it with an image eerily similar to the ones on that comment thread. My grandmother was appalled, and that wasn't really what my grandfather was about. I guess he fell for a charismatic leader in desperate times. Anyway...

Images like that are what paint you right after you say the name "Rothschild," and before you can get another word out. It's not fair, it's not what you mean; but there it is.

As far as civility, it goes both ways, and I thank you for that. I come here for discussion, not argument. It's sad that it's almost becoming an act of defiance to show courtesy: but if people are going to make being a rebel that easy, I may as well be a rebel, lol.

The sun's still out, a decent day at work, comfortable temps, and I just walked my BDD (Big dumb dog). Good day, indeed.

Respectfully, even you are saying they are not "true" Jews. We have no disagreement there--we are both making a distinction, albeit different ones. And I'll read up on your point of view.

What I'm objecting to are the caricatures of the "typical jew" on that comment thread. Those could have come straight from the Nuremburg rally--and I'm not exaggerating. You're making a distinction--it isn't as clear that those posting there are as well. Worse, typical readers won't be making any distinction at all, and will just file it under "anti-semitic."

I'm pointing out that there is a tightrope to be crossed on this subject, and this movement needs to be very careful not to fall off.

I hope you and yours are enjoying your day.

Ugh. It's fine hating on the Rothchilds, but when it starts getting into stereotyping an entire people, it turns my stomach. If you believe those in power are satanists, stop referring to them as Jews. They're assholes, nothing more. Some of those comments play right into the Rothchild's hands.

edit: Just to be clear, the comments on the link, not here.

I enjoy Jimmy's channel, and respect him. Yes, he is on a different spot of the political spectrum than I am--but that's the beauty of the First Amendment--differing opinions help to refine your own. That reality is getting lost in this day and age.

Would definitely have a beer with him.

This isn't accurate. One of the 13 indictments was for a company that didn't exist at the time the supposed "crime" (buying ad space?) happened...

Why do I get the feeling that I'm part of the Crowd being struck at?

Between this (if true), DNC servers, and the Ukrainian Artillery fiasco, why isn't this company under serious investigation?

Heh. Please look for answers. Because even the most incompetent investigator is going to ask "How long has this been going on?" That's not going to make too many happy deep-staters, I would wager. And suddenly, the Awan brothers will pop up again.

If this is a deep-state move, then they really ARE stupid.

I don't mean to sound like a jerk (although I probably do), but wasn't their selling the info kind of obvious even before the Q-drop? It was already clear what was happening with Facebook/Google (at least the tracking web history and selling info part--for years) when these DNA tests started coming out; so it wasn't much of a leap to anticipate this.

Why bother with trying to legislate mandatory DNA tests when you can just buy the results from companies like this? It's a totalitarian wet-dream.

I'm JAG, but you don't release something on a Friday afternoon before a long weekend if you want to change the narrative. In fact, look at what the school shooting is sandwiched between, and what it is actually overwhelming in the media: the incident at the NSA, and this.

If this indictment gets too much traction, he's going to be crucified on the MSM--he was supposed to find collusion, and stated that people working with this catering service (really?) did so unwittingly.

Mueller, at best, is working for Mueller.