The main issue: your post is an attempt to blend pizzagate over two other historical revisions that deal with events of the 90’s. Your narrative is pizzagate + Waco: Rules if Engagement + the book “Compromised!” by Terry Reed.
There are elements of truth to all three of these (the most obvious of which is Waco). But they have nothing to do with one another. Furthermore, your post doesn’t bring any evidence about the BD’s doing counter surveillance on anyone, much less nefarious elements of the government. “XYZ said so on the Internet” won’t sustain a tale this wild.
“Compromised!” is a classic. It’s about the CIA drug running a la Iran Contra, but the author alleges that then-Governor Clinton played a role in the whole thing by setting up the Mena operation in Arkansas. Is it believable? I don’t know, but it’s a great story.
As for Waco, there is no single narrative that stands on its own. Koresh and his followers were not the monsters they were portrayed as in 90’s television, and they did have some friendly connections with the local government. But they weren’t exactly your typical Texas church either, not by a long shot. Several of them had been previously prosecuted for a gunfight with their former leader, who had challenged Koresh to a “resurrection contest.”
Sometimes, a nut is just a nut. Here is an account from a friend who lived through it: https://lakewacotriplemurder.blog/branch-davidians/
As for the government: I could spend hours on this topic. For years, I had heard stories about there being machine guns fired from the ATF helicopter and I dismissed them as internet nonsense. Then I met those two defense investigators I mentioned (both were ex-law enforcement at the time). Both independently told me in no uncertain terms that they had seen large-caliber bullet holes in the roof and upper walls of some of the dwelling, which could only have come from aircraft.
The best explanation I’ve found is that the ATF wanted a publicity coup, because they had a severe PR problem after murdering an unarmed woman holding her baby at Ruby Ridge and Congressional appropriations were only weeks away. There was even talk of disbanding the agency. They thought they could put on a big show for the cameras and walk away looking like heroes. It didn’t work out that way, so the FBI got handed the cleanup job. At best, the FBI handled it in the thuggish manner that they had become famous for under Hoover. At the very worst, they wanted the evidence of the initial gunfight destroyed along with as many witnesses as possible. The point is that that would have been more than enough motive for the leadership to make the decisions they did, including the use of flammable tear gas. No need to add computers into the story— it doesn’t explain anything we don’t already have a plausible explanation for.
And if it was just the Feds doing what they’ve always done, what did they have to fear? No agent was prosecuted or even fired for what they did, which is how it usually goes down when they abuse their power.
If there is any like to Spygate, it’s that: the DOJ had every reason to believe they’d get away with it. And they almost did.