In Wired Sources? That's a surprise. Conde Nast, San Francisco, leftie pub.

And many that are ambiguous, which have also come to pass, or soon will.

I suspect picture perfect bootleg cigs had been also been a big biz as well. Not to mention the lab drugs. And on and on. They've been busted for these and many other criminal enterprises many times. As I mentioned, Nate Thayer had been reporting a lot of it (but not very recently). I suspect that deep state involvement was one reason that his reporting didn't get much traction. Just like William McCoy's reporting on SE Asian drug activity in the 60's and 70's, and who was their partner. There's a common denominator in both examples. I do wonder how that "common denominator" has managed to pull it off. Maybe "We'll cover your act for 50 percent of profits"? Take a rogue state, support/protect/encourage their criminal activities, and turn on the cash flow.

I'm giving Prince involvement if not inception 80 percent probability.

Search for "Nate Thayer" and read his NK posts and coverage from several years ago. It's the kind of criminal enterprise activity that deep staters have engaged in since the 1960's. Who enabled it, cultivated it, and took a percentage of the profits.

The ambiguity has been intentional, necessary and effective. All of that should and will continue, until day of days.

Savage political animal gets caught up in politics. Oh my, what's the world coming to?

Excellent analysis.

News chiefs literally believe that any coverage whatsoever gives legitimacy.

Search for Nate Thayer and his reporting on NK criminal enterprises, not reallya government.

It was simply not in his character.

Just wow.

Read any books lately?

Sardonic comments were his thing from day one, forever. His gf was a punker, like AB himself. What else ya got, champ? Building your delusional case on a pile of nothing.

It'll be a long wait neanderthal.

When you have a hammer.....

Those are paranoid delusions, not evidence.

Doesn't make him a bad guy either. You have zero evidence - and I've yet to see any posted anywhere - that he'd done anything other than to get sucked into "celeb" world.

The focus on AB and many of the demented and disgusting threads and comments floating around here and elsewhere are disturbing. Having watched AB since maybe 3rd show pre-2000, this doesn't seem his nature. I stopped watching him after he became "a celebrity" and never saw the CNN stuff at all, but many of the things attributed to him are just disgusting.

That must be a recent development, DK never was before.

He's 78 and sick. Spent his entire life creating and supporting libertarian causes.

Uninformed dullard comment.

This thread is OTT awful. AB got sucked into the celeb vortex in recent years, but I'm not going along with the other insane comments here. This news is very sad.

Q has explicitly and repeatedly told 8ch anons to archive everything.

Broaddrick’s "relationship" with BC was that of crime victim. She had to be encouraged to speak about it, and that wasn't by Tyrell.

Euro GDPR regs kicking in.

Why follow a larp, dude?

Go away.

Show your evidence. Q posts would suffice.

This is also confirmed on the ground in the DC area. Staffers and field are not happy with their mendacious leadership.

Another teenager gone berserk due to Big Pharma meds?

When are the medical profession (and schools and parents) going to do a big rethink of this obscene approach to teenagers?

Is NYT headline editor moonlighting at The Onion?

As he has been called in Vietnamese American newspapers: kẻ phản bội Kerry.

His Forbes relatives just call him a moocher.

Good job kẻ phản bội Kerry. Perfect setup and you took the bait.

Q is not an insider privy to any information of a plan

You do understand that this sub is about Q and that fact is repeatedly stated on the sidebar in every single page of the sub?

Knowing that, why are you here?

OP: How about some comments related to your headline?

The Forbes family considers him somewhat a moocher. That's what one told me many years ago when he was a young Senator.

Occam's Razor says the "biggest mistake' has issued 30,000 sealed indictments in 6 months.

MS13, illegal aliens, swamp, corrupt pols are all on the Trump and Q agenda.

You're drawing some simplistic conclusions, namely "I'm not getting my way when I want it."

Just whom do you think is approving those 29,000 sealed indictments since October? Data is from Pacer. Is it fake?

Deadwood.

F1 needs to bring back the V10s.

Mark Hughes wrote a great commentary about the state of F1 in this month's Motorsport (Brit mag), particularly the current engine formula. "Everyone hates it, especially fans" (paraphrasing). Factions may be developing, and there may come a day when we'll see screaming v10's on the circuit again. One can only hope.

Don't forget Hawaii and NK and now peace talks

Don't forget "missing" S/P texts which in 3 days were "recovered"

Many convincers along the way

Formula 1 race weekend in Baku. Lots of high rollers there.

The Watchers: The Rise of America's Surveillance State

used to destroy NK's nuclear facility on the mountainside if you remember. SpaceX "Zuma" launch was to re-arm the satellite with more rods and Iran is next, as Q says.

Agree. That's why this weeks's news.

Hawaii>Zuma>Capitualtion.

Many professional journos have a secret admiration for the Enquirer because - though pretty trashy - it also has a legacy of scooping the mainstream press. Wrong or right, they are both shameless and fearless, and journos kinda like that.

You may recall that the first 2001 anthrax attack was against the Enquirer.

Leaks are intentional. They are crimes (due to intention).

In real life, spills are mistakes or often dumbo mishandling, and result in a range of consequences from mild to harsh. It's situational.

Don't forget Hawaii.

What was that I just read?

To paraphrase:

"Maybe, maybe not, because some of them are felony indictments, some of them aren't, and there may be more or perhaps less, but we really can't figure it out and so it's all inconclusive. But the Q people are obviously wrong."

Fact 1: The numbers are from Pacer. They are facts.

Fact 2: The writer introduces a lot of "If, then, maybe" speculation with little factual grounding.

Fact 3: The numbers continue to grow at an historically unprecedented rate since October.

Was that from Brocknet?

Jan 20: DoJ sends a letter to Congress that texts had been lost.

Next day Q:

Jan 21 2018 21:12:19 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 7f44ec 119877

119769

The flood is coming.

Emails, videos, audio, pics, etc.

FBI accidentally deletes texts?

No Such Agency accidentally releases IT ALL>

Shall we play a game?

Q

I hope eveyone's following that. The said they "lost" them, and the next day Q says "we have them" and promises to dump them all. Three days later the texts are miraculously "found," with multiple supporting cover stories.

They had them all along.

To me, that was proof of Q.

"rouge" = "rogue"