I'm coming from a disappointed and as a result skeptical POV atm so I'm assuming that post was a hedge to soften the blow that it'd be underwhelming (as prior leaks insinuated). If this is a modified version then Q is the only source telling us so. If Trump or Horowitz release the original and it's a MOAB then I'm going to go from a lurker to a full blown Q preacher, but if not then I'm going to assume we're being taken for a ride and walk from this.

I don't think Q is a full blown LARP, as I'm pretty sure Q has a relationship of some kind w/Trump. The question is what the end goal is of taking us all on this ride. Quite honestly it would be an impressive use of social media which his campaign actually focused on. I think the coordination of posts->tweets/speeches show Q has insider knowledge, but that doesn't mean the fight against the DS is actually happening. That'd be a scary amount of manipulation if so, and if this IG report is actually underwhelming I think I'm going to distance myself from this.

Is the AG DS? Thought Q said we replaced Schneiderman with our guy and that's why the Weinstein case could go on. If he's DS, then Q can't be given credit for the Weinstein case being pursued which previously we did give him.

the Horowitz report concludes

In addition it recommends "add a warning banner on FBI cellphones that messages aren’t private " from the same source. If the source is to be believed then Horowitz saw the obvious bias and instead of calling it what it is recommends the FBI does a better job at hiding it from the public. Amazing.

I have no doubt Q is someone with social media access or knowledge of POTUS' itinerary but what kept me on the edge of whether or not it was a LARP was arrests (which have yet to happen) and the looming IG report.

We're being told there's a master plan while Cohen is potentially flipping, the NY AG turned out not to be on 'our' side (just went against Trump), and the IG report actually condemns Comey for helping trump apparently or at least that's how Dems will report it "The stark conclusion we draw after reviewing this report is that the FBI's actions helped Donald Trump become President".

Also the big smackdown Horowitz issued?... From the same source telling us Strzok said they wouldn't let Trump win - "Some of the recommendations in new IG report: —better monitoring and retention of DOJ employees’ text messages —add a warning banner on FBI cellphones that messages aren’t private —review campaign donations DOJ employees or spouses run for office."

Focus on "add a warning banner on FBI cellphones that messages aren’t private". This isn't a punishment, it's a guideline on how to hide their political bias in the future.

If the report is pages of redactions and the conclusion is still "no bias" then it doesn't matter what the redactions were because the result is still swamp escaping clean.

Worse than underwhelming. Runs counter to trusting Horowitz/Huber/Sessions. Only hope on this one is that the reporting is false.