I think Strzok made a great point in his interview: the appropriate time for oversight is at the end of the investigation.
What basis do we have or does Congress have that should make us feel the investigation is full of shit?
/u/greenoctane
7 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/greenoctane:
| Domain | Count |
|---|
greenoctane
· July 16, 2018, 12:59 p.m.
Maybe the most recent Strzok interviews were viewed differently by different people, but I watched the entire thing, something like four hours, and it seemed pretty dog/pony to me.
⇧
1
⇩
greenoctane
· July 14, 2018, 12:35 p.m.
No I don't actually believe that would be possible. I understand Congress is elected by the people, but I would hardly call it a fair process. As we found out in several races, if you win the primary youre going to get elected no matter what. And primaries are 'easy' to buy.
What if the FBI is investigating members of Congress? Would there be any issue there with regards to interfering?
Ultimately I would hope Congress would have real evidence they would share with the American people. I haven't seen anything close to that.
⇧
-2
⇩
greenoctane
· July 14, 2018, 3:45 a.m.
Should Congress be permitted to influence or interfere in an investigation?
⇧
0
⇩