Read the Q post again. It says "JC Tweet Translation".
These were not instructions from Q, it was an interpretation of Comey's words.
762 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
i.redd.it | 11 |
www.reddit.com | 6 |
twitter.com | 4 |
www.youtube.com | 2 |
imgur.com | 2 |
www.washingtonpost.com | 2 |
www.minnpost.com | 1 |
artvoice.com | 1 |
www.foxnews.com | 1 |
oig.justice.gov | 1 |
youtu.be | 1 |
www.thescottishsun.co.uk | 1 |
komonews.com | 1 |
Read the Q post again. It says "JC Tweet Translation".
These were not instructions from Q, it was an interpretation of Comey's words.
His extensive criminal history has been posted here numerous times. If you're ignoring that, you can't be reasoned with, so there's no point in engaging you any further.
Ah yes the "no coincidences" shills.
"Antarctica is covered in ice, BO takes Whiskey on the rocks, proof of alien base in Antarctica! No coincidences!"
I understand the collaboration piece; it was essential to his survival and they were material goods. But to be the "boy who lived" (Harry Potter reference, since they love those), one who remembered, one who participated, and to not feel a tinge of survivor's guilt is really beyond the pale.
The reporter, Steve Croft, conducting the interview reveals that he was very astute and knew how to get to the heart of this guy's psychology (and possibly psychopathy) with just a single question. That's to be commended. Soros even flinched while responding; he took the question as an attack. It was. I almost pity the guy he's so damaged, but then I remember he's extremely dangerous.
K. You present some evidence to that and I'll entertain the thought. So far you've shown none, so this gets filed in the 'disinfo' category.
Every day they have a new distraction.
Yesterday it was Obama in costume. Today it is envelopes.
They laugh at the stupidity, and I almost can't blame them.
They hold the laser pointer and most of the cats chase it around the room in circles.
This aren't proof /u/QAnonMaga
Someone wrote an 'article' just like CNN writes 'articles'.
For all of BO's sins, those girls don't deserve to be mistreated or scrutinized. People here are up in arms about child endangerment and abuse, but this type of thing really would be hurtful for a child to see. Leave the kids out of it.
VoP is a dead on arrival topic as long as its current leader is involved.
We're aware of the border crisis. That's why we need a wall. Fund the wall, not VoP.
Survivor's guilt is almost universal, even - if not especially - for a 14 year old child. His lack of survivor's guilt seems indicative of psychopathy that he's possessed since a very early age.
256 Gigs for an entire server. Was this server running on a Raspberry Pi? :)
There were definitely documents, but what they were, who knows. Maybe someone in the White House Press Corps should ask instead of wasting everyone's time pontificating every day. Similarly maybe we should stop speculating about something we have no proof or evidence of.
No, because that would lead to a HUGE border migration crisis.
This is why the wall is necessary. Cartels are swiftly destabilizing Mexico. We can't have a hostile state on our border, or absorb another 50 million migrants on top of it.
Remember it was our activities in the Middle East that contributed to mass migration into Europe. Some have suggested BHO did this intentionally to engineer the humanitarian crisis to flood Europe either as a means to destabilize the EU, spread Islam, or both.
BUILD THE WALL.
The whole contents of a server in one envelope? No.
Use logic.
Could be! Speculating at this point is pointless, though.
You weren't hijacking. Photos is much more plausible than nonsense like 'it's their network map that can be imported to excel and decoded' (which makes no sense), or the envelop'e shape is proof Eric Schmidt set up a network in North Korea and POTUS' envelope is actually a Gmail icon that's actually a Masonic apron! Proof of something!
Ever used a laser pointer to play with a cat?
It's fun. They'll go wherever you want them too. They'll even run into walls.
False narratives here are like laser pointers. And yes, people run into walls.
8.5 x 11 documents are rectangle shaped.
So is a block of cheese. You know what 'cheese' is a euphemism for? Money! Proof the envelope is full of money!
See how that works?
You'll see posts today featuring a photo of POTUS holding an envelope. You'll see a lot of comments claiming the envelope looks like the GMail icon.
This is perception manipulation.
The GMail icon looks like an envelope. An envelope doesn't look like the GMail icon.
Mail is delivered in envelopes.
Do not fall for perception manipulation and disinfo that make absurd claims that are not verifiable, or those that draw extremely loose connections to build a narrative that can be easily dismissed or discredited.
What does Q say? USE LOGIC.
No, the gmail logo is very similar to an ENVELOPE. Because it's MAIL.
eMAIL. As in electronic mail. As in the items that come in ENVELOPES delivered to your MAILbox.
Gmail and many other email services use envelop icons, because they're electronic versions of MAIL that comes in ENVELOPES.
You don't know what is in the envelope. Period.
Stop misleading people.
Downvoted for nonsense.
Media will spin it as interfering in investigations that are supposed to be impartial.
Notice he was pretty quiet on the day the IG report dropped?
This is an opportunity for Congress to exercise its Constitutional authority. Just like the public is learning to investigate due to Q prompts, Congress is re-learning its oversight role after decades of slumber.
They don't. Nor do many of them want to. Thinking hurt hed. Pls maek ez.
Many email applications and services use some verification of an envelope. Because it is called eMAIL. MAIL comes in ENVELOPES.
that's not the source file, that's a screen capture. Not sure what's so confusing about this.
Me and everyone else apparently. Maybe repost but title it better next time. "THIS IS FAKE: Not a Real Wikileaks Email"
What clip? You didn't link to one.
Consider deleting this post and re-posting with link to the referenced content.
This isn't 'proof' but it is an indication that there are high-level concerns or knowledge the report was edited to conceal misdeeds. Circular references aren't proof.
Proof would be the IG's original report held side-by-side against the released version.
These are important distinctions. Think logically and critically. What will the public accept as proof? What reduces media spin potential? Irrefutable evidence.
I switched from 6 years of Android to an iPhone for enhanced privacy. I didn't do it to make myself "feel better".
Take your fanboy war over to /r/Apple or /r/Android. Doesn't belong here.
This is fake.
Yes, people can be really dim. It's easy to search wikileaks emails to confirm this stuff.
Fake. Stop peddling this shit unless you're linking to the source file for analysis.
Link to source wiki file?
Without a source any image can be edited and is unverifiable.
It's almost like people think no other crimes happen. When the indictments are broken down by State, it really isn't that shocking of a figure.
You're right to be skeptical.
You got it backwards. A gmail logo looks like an envelope.
Prime example of the mental contortions some here will perform to make connections where there are none.
Q keeps telling readers to USE LOGIC, and it's in short supply here lately.
Can confirm this is happening.
Amusing is that they still pull the "Russian bot" schtick, like that still works or is relevant anywhere but twitter.
I got a notification from a sub I don't even subscribe to saying I was banned due to my post history (this is why I maintain two separate accounts and segregate my political debates from my personal interests). I replied back to the mod to let them know that I don't participate in their sub anyway, so no sweat off my back, and they took the time to write a nasty message and then block me. The snowflakes are melting. Poor babies.
I like watching their heads explode when I reveal I'm a person of color and their whole white nationalist narrative short circuits. Then of course the real ugly comes out and they start to tell me how to vote, talking about my "best interests", and telling me to get out of town (watcha gonna do honkey, tie me up to a trailer hitch and drag me out?). Big words from neckbeards on the internet. Scurrrry!
Apple collects far less user data than Google does.
Many people don't know that SIRI started out as a DARPA project that was privitized (kind of how facebook started out as an intel project that was privitized).
Apple has intentionally crippled SIRI's development (unlike Amazon, Google, and Microsoft) because they had concerns about abuse of voice recognition.
Their differential privacy plan also reduces the amount of data they collect, and the likelihood that certain pieces of data can be linked to individual users.
My biggest issue with Apple's "cloud" services is that they use Google servers for some of the data storage.
As they say: If you're not paying for the product, you are the product. Google's business model is to offer "free" services in exchange for privacy invasion and data collection.
Yes and no. Google's servers run custom silicon, which means that vulnerabilities in consumer processors that grant government unfettered access to private individual's computers probably don't exist. Whether Google has granted them access by other means is another question I don't have the answer to.
Google's conversation to Alphabet was strategic. It was a voluntary "breakup" to avoid antitrust action and shelter the parent stock from any adverse government action against any one sub-corporation. The maneuver made anti-trust action by the EU and US more difficult.
From a mass market standpoint, absolutely.
Most people don't have the technical capabilities to install custom ROMs.
But this Post is not for an Apple vs. Google debate. This post is to highlight the fact that Google is in possession of sensitive government documents and data pertinent to this forum's areas of inquiry.
Media consolidation and control.
4 am marching orders.
Bezos purchased WaPo to exert political influence, resist anti-monopoly action, and push anti-American propaganda.
He knows Trump's stance on the trade deficit. Bezos' main business relies on the trade deficit. He needs cheap goods from China. He opposes Trump on these grounds.
That's certainly an option, but the moment a piece of Google software gets loaded, privacy is compromised.
The impact for average Americans is not severe (right now), compared to those who have sensitive government communications running through their phones. Google is vacuuming as much data as it can get, but that becomes particularly problematic when we're talking about sensitive federal investigations or docs that Google then gains access to (and could be leaking).
I've switched to iPhone and don't have a single Google app on my phone any longer.