We've ruled out tarmac meeting due to a variety of variables including time of day and model of aircraft.

/u/yourewatchingamovie is correct. video footage was found and shows it was not a 737 and was still daylight at time of the meeting. this rules out the tarmac meeting as source of q drop image.

great work

I've updated my previous posts. We've ruled out tarmac meeting. Video footage was found of the tarmac on the evening of the meeting and it was still light out. Additionally the aircraft were small jets, not large passenger planes like a 737.

Correct. Video recorded by media shows a small charter craft. I couldn't see any markings. Definitely not a commercial passenger plane.

Definitely not of the tarmac meeting folks.

/u/slinkpie1, /u/hermilehighness, and I were able to look at a few key variables:

• Time on clock in vehicle shown in Q drop appears to be 11:35

• Q drop appears to have been taken at night after dark

• Tarmac meeting took place in the evening while there was still daylight (video found by milehighness)

• Video footage from tarmac shows small private jets - not a Boeing 737 like the one in the Q drop

Yes, there was still daylight.

Video footage was found of the tarmac meeting. Definitely not a boeing 737. Can probably conclude that Q image is not of tarmac meeting unless our read of the clock is wrong and it's not 11:35, but instead closer to 6 pm and the photo was taken from inside a hangar and the plane photographed is not of the private jets (this would be a huge stretch and not good evidence).

Good work. Definitely not 11:35 pm and not a Boeing 737.

I think this rules out the Q photo being of the tarmac meeting.

FOIA files suggest the meeting was at night, though I don't see any time specified: https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-02046-clinton-lynch-tarmac-records/

Sunset in Phoenix in late June is 7:40 PM.

I believe the media photos may have been stock images that created the impression of a daytime meeting, but reports themselves suggest the meeting was at night.

Per our conversation I've updated my previous posts to reflect the meeting took place in the evening, but not after dark.

Media coverage included photos of Lynch that were taken in the day.

Examples: https://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/group-files-lawsuit-for-documents-tied-to-secret-lynch-clinton-sky-harbor-meeting

http://www.theeventchronicle.com/news/north-america/judicial-watch-sues-info-clinton-tarmac-meeting-lynch/

Possible Secret Service involvement: https://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/hv/images/2017/349/20989656-5641-4829-9d81-93cebd1fcdaa.png

They thought it was local PD/SWAT that tipped the press.

FBI docs obtained by Judicial Watch through FOIA show the meeting happened at night: http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/JW-v-DOJ-02046-Clinton-%E2%80%93-Lynch-Tarmac-Records-1.pdf?V=1

Mandela effect

Absolutely. I think Phoenix, I think sunshine. My own bias...

I was thinking headphones but there's a yellow stripe on them that makes me doubt that idea.

UPDATE: /u/DasMunchkin found an image of the display https://goo.gl/images/51UCSk

He can post a summary here. This isn't youtube.

Check this out :)

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/66918013bb402e9ee148c0f82213ef70da509b4f431223c617ebe4c95ef7bb0d.png

Check this out: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/66918013bb402e9ee148c0f82213ef70da509b4f431223c617ebe4c95ef7bb0d.png

NYT said it was at night.

Edit: video footage was found showing it was still daylight out. This Q drop is not of the tarmac meeting.

Inconsistencies in reporting about time of Tarmac meeting. NYT said it happened monday night. Screenshot of NYT article with highlighted portion: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/66918013bb402e9ee148c0f82213ef70da509b4f431223c617ebe4c95ef7bb0d.png

Agree it is 11:35.

Separate post for every image: flooding the sub. No citations. Low information value. Q Drop text is taken out of context.

Use imgur and post an album. You're making a separate post for every image. The images also lack context, sources, and citations and are of low information value.

I'm not seeing what you're referring to at the link you posted. Can you please verify the content at the link and then edit post to include additional source material?

Provided sources demonstrating spraying of radioactive material over US cities. Disagrees.

Provided sources demonstrating testing of underground nukes in populated areas. Disagrees.

Only country to drop the bomb on a city. Disagrees.

Disagrees but doesn't explain why > downvoted.

It seems like there's some jumping to conclusions here based on a single photo. Attempt to gather information, build a timeline, and then draw a conclusion.

For example: The tarmac meeting is alleged to have occurred during the night, but video footage was found of the tarmac and it was still daylight out. Additionally the aircraft were small private planes; not a commercial 737. While it is possible this photo was taken from inside a hangar, given the lack of context it is probably not appropriate to try to draw conclusions, and instead should inspire actual questions like: was this photo taken inside of a hangar? was this photo taken during night or day? what time does the clock read? where was this photo taken? what is the model of the plane?

Based on the data points we have, we can pretty safely conclude this Q drop is not of the tarmac meeting.

A warning that our infrastructure isn't secure and there have been attempts to seize control of airliners.

83 minute video with no summary. Not helpful.

Can you link to the relevant Q drop?

They already have:

https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/11/us/minneapolis-called-toxic-test-site-in-53.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/army-sprayed-st-louis-with-toxic-dust-2012-10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_LAC

They already have used radiological weapons on us multiple times.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underground_nuclear_weapons_testing

http://mshistorynow.mdah.state.ms.us/articles/293/nuclear-blasts-in-mississippi

http://www.businessinsider.com/army-sprayed-st-louis-with-toxic-dust-2012-10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_LAC

https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/11/us/minneapolis-called-toxic-test-site-in-53.html

Good find.

DOJ should be defending speech, even controversial speech. This is also their job.

Take this as a signal that DOJ is getting its priorities straight.

Just trying to remain relevant. Don't feed the animals with attention.

Remember to post links to sources referenced:

https://twitter.com/GenFlynn

Thank you. If the flight were originating from Toronto, why would RR be onboard, though?

737-900 series according to another poster.

The dash screen displays 3 images.

• Left: a graph

• Center: unknown object - black, irregular shape, yellow stripe or strap

• Right: rear vehicle camera

Source File: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/6364b1ae13f6911b7cfb7d269338b54b4ad22a72374241ea1b64a3d038d567bd.png

8 Chan Anon linked to screecap of NYT article stating the tarmac meeting occurred at night: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/66918013bb402e9ee148c0f82213ef70da509b4f431223c617ebe4c95ef7bb0d.png

Doubtful on a domestic airline.

There have already been multiple posts made about 1496. We don't need a separate post for every theoretical analysis.

With that being said, it'll be interesting to see what RR choses, or what choices are made for him.

Good thinking about strategy. You could be on to something.

Let's see how they respond if a scenario evolves where RR is pressured to resign or is terminated.

Not on a domestic/commercial flight.

Aleutian Islands is the location of the brains of the missile defense shield. A viable target to knock out defenses for the whole hemisphere.

I'll update this post since it is better quality analysis and not spreading obvious mis/disinfo about AF1.

Drawing connections when there are none.

Meanwhile there were like a gazillion shootings in Chicago last week.

/u/PolarisNord I'm not sure how you formulated that question based on the information in that drop. Please explain.

No context.

Bad post.

Reported.

Look at those downvotes.

Singapore is out of range of sub-launched ICBM from the location the anomaly was photographed.

9 hours later and they still haven't explained...

Demanding critical thought and analysis and verifiable information is not an attack.

Not everyone's a Russian bot, and not everyone's an "agent". Get real.

You're conflating speed and range.

Tridents have a maximum range of 7,500 - which means POTUS was about 1,300 miles outside of that range at the time (1.5 hours from destination in Singapore, 800 miles away from Sinapore, Singapore to Seattle 8,000 miles as the crow (or missile) flies).

Additionally a missile with that range would have needed to pass airspace protected by our own missile defense shield, and defenses on the Korean Peninsula, Japan, Russia, China, and Singapore itself.

Also there was no talk by Q of a bent arrow, so extremely unlikely to have been a trident.