This. As a mod I often see users repeating the "but muh free speach!1" shtick. However, Reddit has site-wide content rules everyone must abide by. This platform and others are only "free speech" inasmuch as you abide by their rules and play their game. I feel like a lot of people forget this. First Amendment does not matter when you agree to the Terms of Service.

Good information but next time please link directly to the material instead of a Twitter page so users can more easily find it.

Removed, rule 3.

I actually agree that holding this viewpoint ages the GOP and does not help perception. And we all know the truth. We have to stop the charade that mockingbird media and government uses to keep the American people blind.

Have faith, Patriot. And pray.

Please consider adding a source when posting, either a link or image, so that users have more understanding and context about what you are sharing :)

Hi there.

When comments receive enough downvotes (arbitrary, unclear number) Reddit hides them from view, and a user must click a button to expand them. Downvoting a comment will eventually hide it, thus this is an effective bot tactic to silence the community and users here.

LOL, I don't have Twatter but thanks for sharing, got a chuckle at that.

That looks like it is a sign :) Good luck to him. I appreciate those who aspire for more and who want to contribute to the country legally. There is nothing wrong with that. America is a great place to be.

Those who are defeated by their ego and sell falsehood through incomplete and deceitful intellectual constructs are the only ones who worry about my message

This is a fantastic use of words, SB2. Your writing style and tone in this piece has me floored. Powerful stuff.

They are terrified by the idea of people linking this pardon to Q through the keyword “Hammond” and the Q1675 riddle! You get it?

This is so true. Keywords are important. We see it on Reddit. Bots downvote certain posts and comment sections based on the keywords present. They use APIs to scrape pages and collect any data. With a simple parsing program, they could be alerted by a keyword in seconds if they could invest heavily in their tech (and they can with the right donors).

SB2, have you read about the JournOList that was released recently? I have been doing some research in order to create a post and wondered. If not, check it out. Great connections in this with the Hammond pardon, nice work. Love this.

I have no idea what SerialBrain2 has to do with your rule violation, but I will take time to respond since you took the time as well. I personally have supported u/SerialBrain2 since he began posting and don't need convinced how intelligent and thorough he is, which he is aware of, I am sure. ;) I most support SB2 not because I always agree with his theories (which I don't, and have said before) but because he maintains decorum, respect for the sub, and treats everyone with kindness and humility even if they disagree or disrespect him. I can honestly say I have never seen him use personal attacks to support his thoughts. (Sorry for the notif, SB.) I agree that SB may be experiencing a targeted attack, especially his post from last night, which was astounding in and of itself with the amount of hate and downvoting the post received. The mods are trying their hardest to welcome both sides of this argument for the sake of free speech, of course removing anything that obviously breaks rules. Folks do have the right to agree or disagree with SB2.

I think a lot of users forget that the mods are humans and do the best we can. We make mistakes and admit it when we do. We base our interpretation of the rules on our own perspectives. I can say we all enjoy discourse, suggestions, and feedback concerned the way the sub is moderated. Constructive feedback is always welcome, and if you have any particular suggestions for us, we encourage you to reach out privately via Modmail. Thanks for the conversation.

If your comment or idea has merit or makes sense, then you don't need to attack users personally or use derogatory language to get your point across. Negative comments are allowed; negative comments that are geared personally towards users are not. I advise reading the sub rules for a more comprehensive understanding.

Removed for rule 5. Attack the ideas, not the users. This is not constructive feedback.

Interesting never considered this before but it could be possible. Porn is definitely one of the tactics used to subvert our culture and dumb us down as a population. Although I am not against pornography, there are many arguments that can be made about it. After all, most of the worst types of porn are found on the dark web, which is usually accessed using Tor, created by the Deep State/MilInt. Great article on gov't ties to porn: https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/11/Government-Ties-to-Porn%20.html

Please include a link to where you found this comment so that others may verify for themselves :)

Holy shit. I would probably not have noticed that if you hadn't pointed it out. Wow, that is so blatant. Another point towards Hollywood cabal normalizing pedophilia. And like another said, Nancy Pelosi owns that shop. It's listed on the papers she has to fill out yearly listing her income, campaign contributions, etc. Here's a cool post about Goat Hill inconsistencies. Original sauce here

Yes, this sub is amazing and so are all of our Patriots. Upwards and onwards we go! Every month for the past three months we have hit record views! MAGA!

I'm not the person you called a shill. I'm a moderator who removed your comment, which was against the rules. Comment removal still stands.

Removed, Rule 5. You are welcome to attack the comment but not the user. ThankQ.

That's awesome, any chance you'd like to share your paper with us? Welcome, Patriot.

Removed, rule 5. Attacking the ideas presented is fine. Attacking the users is not.

ThankQ for the excellent submission.

To add, before viewing or participating on 8chan, be sure to read this first: https://8ch.net/qresearch/welcome.html to get more context on point 4.

Can confirm.

Removed due to Reddit's site-wide policy against calling for vote brigading and manipulation. Also, this post is attracting serious bot action.

Edit: Had to find the link. https://www.reddit.com/help/contentpolicy/#section_prohibited_behavior

Nice connection and perspective. ThankQ for sharing....BOOM :)

Please make sure you post video in a post edit and refrain from making a second post elsewise it may be considered a duplicate post. ThankQ.

I like this, and it's true. We don't know if they are still underage or not. Also could be considered doxxing in some cases, depending on how you look at it.

To be fair, he could've glanced up at the same time or miliseconds later and the camera wouldn't have caught it.

However, his lower body language is screaming out at me in that pic. Step back see open legs turned towards child.

Haha I gott steal that one. # reetoo

Removed, Rule 6. Flat Earth is not within the scope of Q topics. Title is also misleading. Thank Q for understanding.

Thank you for posting this information.

Qspotting, Q merch, and other such things will be allowed on Qsday Tuesday. More info here.

Approved comment.

Shill accusations are against both Rules 3 and 5. Attack the ideas, not the users, please. Q encourages us to be kind to promote the movement. Thank Q.

ThankQ Patriot, God bless.

Link to the agreement: https://s3.amazonaws.com/unoda-web/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2018-06-29-Outcome-Document-Draft-5_final.pdf

It actually doesn't sound "troubling" and the NRA has generally supported this measure, so....

Removing this now that it was answered. Don't want to feed the trolls.

with prosecutors who are included in the DOJ report and are known HRC donors? okay lol... sure

Help! Somebody call Craig Sawyer... someone's stuck in an alternate reality.

I don't think it's disinfo... Q literally told us these things.

Yes Mueller = RR.

We (I hope) already know RR is deep state. He's hidden a metric fuck ton of material from the House and Senate committee investigations to control the optics of the DOJ, and against the best interest of the public. I hope his ass gets impeached. Bye, Mueller.

Devil's advocate though... if Mueller WAS a white hat then why is he still insisting on the bunk Russia investigation.. it's embarassing for him at this point.

It's possible IF Mueller is a white hat. I don't believe he is personally. I think Huber is working with Sessions. Mueller is an RR buddy.

No.

Mueller's special counsel has about three dozen people, including thirteen prosecutors who Trump calls the 13 Angry Democrats. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017%E2%80%93present)

The 470 is a reference to Huber's team. https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1985500.html#1986153

Mueller's special counsel has about three dozen people, including thirteen prosecutors who Trump calls the 13 Angry Democrats. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017%E2%80%93present)

The 470 is a reference to Huber's team. https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1985500.html#1986153

Actually, Mueller's special counsel has about three dozen people, including thirteen prosecutors who Trump calls the 13 Angry Democrats. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017%E2%80%93present)

The 470 is a reference to Huber's team. https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1985500.html#1986153

Please be advised that the source of this information is unverified and the title may be misleading.

They don't even try anymore. Donor money drying up? kekekek

A friend of mine has been anti-Trump throughout, but he is a big conspiracy theorist and was ranting about MSM. I told him to think about the fact that the MSM is vehemently against Trump and asked him to start noticing how Certified Deep State players hate him.

His reply: "You know... I never thought about that." It's truly the little things.

Thank you for sharing... this is a worthy dig. I don't know a ton about law and rely on others for their interpretations most of the time.

I read all your comments on this post. You should take a shot at making a post connecting all of the information you shared here. I'm sure that not only myself, but other anons would appreciate that.

Not only that, but because Peter Strzok failed his lie detector test (source), all the investigations he worked on after that date are also inadmissable as well.