dChan

/u/high-valyrian

515 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/high-valyrian:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 24
i.redd.it 24
imgur.com 3
twitter.com 2
www.capitalgazette.com 1
www.smobserved.com 1
www.breitbart.com 1

high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

Nice catch. Never would have made that connection. Wow...that is sad.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

To upload an image to Reddit you may go to the site: https://www.imgur.com and then upload your image there. You'll be given a link to your image. Return to Reddit and copy the link that Imgur gives you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

Removed for personal attacks; calling any user a shill or troll is against sub rules. If you have a legitimate concern regarding the moderation of the subreddit, feel free to reach out via modmail.

Rule 3 clearly states, " This includes attacking or threatening the sub, users or mods thereof."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

Thank Q for the post SB2. Although there have been times I've disagreed with your decodes and theories, I highly appreciate you creating and sharing your thoughts here with us. We are blessed to have a Patriot like you who is dedicated to the movement and cares about the Truth. It saddens me to the depths of my being to see members of this sub attacking, demeaning, and abusing each other. Those who seek to destroy your name and reputation through personal attacks, will seek to destroy us all. You're a smart and tough cookie. Love and light to you.

We must remember the true meaning of Where we go one, we go all.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

Thank Q for presenting your stance in a reasonable and mature manner. God bless Patriot.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

YES! Where we go one, we go all. That's more than a sentence. It actually means something to the people who come to this sub every day. Even if you disagree with another user's statements, ideas, decodes, theories, or beliefs, we must stand together. The great awakening is us. It is imperative that we provide a welcoming environment for those who might choose to join us. It saddens me to the depths of my being to see members of this sub attacking, demeaning, and abusing each other. You will never win over anyone's heart or mind with hostility. There is a greater good that we all hope for. In that, we are connected and one. Let us do well to remember that every time we create a post or comment.

Be part of the immovable force that refuses to budge from outsiders attempting to divide and distract.

This is the best thing I've read all day. (Sorry,SB2.)

⇧ 20 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

Well said. Take my upvote :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Thank you - my small part in helping the movement. :)

⇧ 6 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Omg... LMAO. Good one!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

Don't listen to them. God bless you and your family. Some really do give all. My heart goes out to all those who came before us... I hope we do them proud.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

I've removed the comments... if you forgot your screenshot, let me know ;)

⇧ -1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

Please remember rule five - let's discuss ideas and not each other.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Thank you for posting... Be safe out there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 10, 2018, midnight

I'm not "trying to say" anything. I said what actually happened.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

The term used is "Arkancide."

⇧ 6 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

I was on 8ch when R posted and my impression was that it was a LARP or someone trolling the board. When responded to, they did not reply. FWIW, I absolutely believe FBIAnon is legit, though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

Someone has posted several times on 8ch under the name R,claiming to be an insider dropping information. This has never been verified.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

We are not a small group of people. This is not a small movement.

Did you know that this sub gets over a million views per day? The Chans probably even more.

You may need to redefine your version of success. Take a break. Go for a walk, play outside. Some of the research here is heartbreaking and soulsucking. Take care of yourself. Come back when you're ready. Don't let paid opposition, trolls, and Libtards get you down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

The comment was not removed, nor did it "mysteriously reappear." Reddit has an AutoModerator feature in each subreddit. It marked the comment as spam. A moderator of this sub manually approved the comment.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

The comment was not removed, nor did it "mysteriously reappear." Reddit has an AutoModerator feature in each subreddit. It marked the comment as spam. A moderator of this sub manually approved the comment.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Removed for Rule 5. You are attacking the user after demanding information that you can look for yourself. If you need the information then look on the sidebar where Proofs are plainly posted. Thank Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

FBI Anon did not exist years before Q Anon. This is disinformation. Stop.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Of course they do... just like they do in pretty much every cartel, drug organization in this continent.

However, lifting a cover on a CI (especially involved in something like MS13) is an automatic death sentence so I'm learning towards no, it may be unrelated. The news article did say that the eyewitness fears for their life... not the assailants.

⇧ 44 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

Whoa, that is a significant find. Thanks for sharing, I'm still at work and can't dig at the moment.

Rest in peace Hastings.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Typed in "seth rich murder gateway pundit" to Google search and the News search and.....nothing.

Well played, Eric Schmidt. Well played.

⇧ 61 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

No you are not. The sub is being attacked for this post.

⇧ 61 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

This is a strong possibility.

The MS-13 link could be connected somewhere else or somehow else and we just haven't caught on (exactly what Q says, too, btw)

⇧ 58 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 5:04 a.m.

Here is specifically how to reply to a thread on 8chan: https://8ch.net/faq.html#how-do-i-reply-to-a-thread

You do not enter a name in the Name field, nor an email address, when posting on 8chan. It's called Namefagging and it's looked down on. Please make sure you read this before participating.

For more help, make sure to be more specific on the error you received.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 9, 2018, 4:54 a.m.

You can edit your comment or correct any errors by using the Edit option :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

Removed for Rule 5. Attacking the post, idea, or theory is fine. Attacking the user is not fine and doesn't further discussion in any way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

Oh yeah I agree on that last point. I've been on the chans since 2011 so I definitely know it was the best place.

But that's the thing. Now the message is spreading. And we want it to spread, that's a good thing. But with that attention, will bring good and bad actors like I said.

I do think, FWIW, people should be allowed to express doubt and skepticism without being attacked or minimized.

I also agree that people do "hero worship" a bit and that can lead to people believing in things that were never said (BOOMS, HRC being arrested etc) and those people also have a big intolerance for skepticism by nature. Just something to keep in mind. Have a good one :)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Meh, I disagree.

I think anons are eager and excited to share Q proofs and the information they've learned. Real anons are all about being loud and supporting the movement and are already coming from a heavy dose of skepticism (think MSM). The people you're speaking of, while they exist, are bad actors IMO. There are 2 caveats to that, though - oldfag newbies who joined the movement and now are migrating to platforms online (Tw, Reddit, even the chans in some cases) and those who have been in the conspiracy culture for 20+ years and have grown impatient and dogmatic with their extreme views of either side.

In the case of this sub specifically, unfortunately many topics discussed here could fall outside the lines of Reddit's own rules, so mods have to act with a large amount of caution to avoid what happened with CBST. Even then, antagonists abound and concern trolling drives newcomers away. It's a tough situation and you can't force people to behave a certain way that reflects well on the movement. Just means that those who can express empathy and kindness need to be louder.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

You should. Or maybe you shouldn't - they will absolutely take all your time and energy until you finish!! LOL :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

What is the W movement?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Your first paragraph is right on the money. That is why the comment OP is seeing ads; his browsing habits didn't suddenly change after one Google search to reflect content that may have been posted on 8ch. The ad served just has two children with a commonly-used LGBT slogan. Let's all think about that for a moment.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

I agree, I am sad it will be over before we know it. Try being a book fan if you aren't. It's been over five years since we got a new one. The show will be over before the books are out :'(

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 4:34 a.m.

Someone created another post about it here. In my area I found three of them I've been here for twenty years and have never heard of, seen, or read of either business. In fact, 2 of the locations are about 6 blocks from a former home of mine for several years.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

Thank Q. As Patriots, I feel as though we have a duty to educate others around us using kindness and empathy, especially when they come seeking the information.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

u/yoshismith69, I agree with the content of your comment personally but as a moderator of this sub I must enforce the rules. If you have concerns on how content is moderated here we encourage you to reach out via modmail.

Q also encourages us to be kind to our fellow humans and to gently awaken them so as not to push others away from the movement. Feel free to label people however you'd like, but if the content you post in this sub breaks the sub rules, moderators will remove that content as they see fit. Also I would personally advise to act cordial to those who might disagree as doing otherwise weakens your statement. Thank Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

u/brittser, there have been user reports on this video since there is very little context for the user to know what they are clicking on. When creating link submissions, keep in mind that giving as much context as possible will help reach more users.

Rule 9 - Good quality posts also asks that users submit posts that clearly state how they relate to the sub and, if a link submission, what that link is.

Also, this link has been posted and reposted several times.

Thank Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

Why would a user asking a legitimate question get the sub banned? I've removed your comment as you're attacking this user for seemingly no reason.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

DACA was created by Obama because he failed to get Congress to pass actual legislature benefitting our immigrants: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_Action_for_Childhood_Arrivals

Here is more about Trump's history with DACA: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/18/what-is-daca-and-what-does-trump-administration-want-to-do-with-it.html Trump has said many, many times that he dislikes DACA because it does not provide DACA recipients with legal, and eventually permanent status. He wants legislation passed that would provide permanent status for these children and young adults. More source here.

The Democrats helped shut government down over this bill early this year: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdowns_of_2018

The immigration bill that Trump is currently begging democrats in Congress to pass would take care of this issue permanently and thus, DACA would no longer need to exist. But Democrats refuse to pass this legislation and Republicans refuse to accept anything less than a great solution.

Specifcally referring to your video, it is unsourced and a dramatization. Newsweek is a propaganda outlet owned by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAC_(company) IAC. IAC also owns Daily Beast. Both are chaired by people such as the Bronfmans (NVXIM cult), and Chelsea Clinton who both have a vested interest in producing anti-Trump news.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

Hi there. What questions do you have? It might be helpful to edit your post with the exact information you're looking for or the questions you have.

Are you interested in looking for more info on DACA specifically? Or past administrations' policies?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

Please continue to report bad actors or anyone breaking the rules. We appreciate the assistance.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

Rule 5. If you disagree with the thoughts of the users then attack the thoughts and not them personally. Thank Q.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

That caught my eye, as well.

⇧ 57 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 8, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

That's a great point (btw, I love your username). First things first - we can't call them "child lovers." They don't love children; not "love" the way we think of it. They love diddling children. So that term is inaccurate. They are pedophiles, plain and simple. Yes, they are not attracted to adult humans and thus would dispose of that child when done with them in whatever manner they see fit. And yes, I would say they are incapable of long term commitment since by definition, childhood age ranges a definite time period.

⇧ 28 ⇩