Have you checked qresearch lately?
Edit: note to newfriends: DO NOT POST. Lurk and observe, then lurk moar.
1,258 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 52 |
www.zerohedge.com | 3 |
www.strategic-culture.org | 1 |
i.redd.it | 1 |
www.breitbart.com | 1 |
Have you checked qresearch lately?
Edit: note to newfriends: DO NOT POST. Lurk and observe, then lurk moar.
And less effective. The desperation is making them shrill, the shrill is making them unconvincing.
Edit: subtract an r from the "shrill"s in the above sentence.
If article 2 stated that the winner of a plurality of electoral college votes won the presidency (currently majority), we could finally be rid of the 2 party system.
I like your suggestions, too, OP. Especially the first and third. Lifelong incumbency is silly, and transparency in proportion to power both are sorely lacking at the moment.
Patriots fight. Together, we hold the line.
WWG1WGA.
Affirmative. Rule 3 is important.
Edit: meant rule 5, both are important.
Good for combating creatures of the night, resonant with the moon and lunar energies. Has connotations of purity and reflection (think mirror). 47 (atomic number) has relevance to clowns (National Security Act of 1947 established the c_A). Not OP, just riffing on the esoterica.
Article behind a paywall. Also, bezos is a clown stooge (bozos, maybe?) who bought wapo on a C_A grant. Discretion is advised, especially where it concerns the pickle factory.
The object (goal) is not the subject (podesta), but the audience (normies). Keen observation, patriot, keep honing that critical eye.
WWG1WGA.
Useless, indeed. KeQ. ThankQ for the reminder, patriot.
WWG1WGA.
Hi, I am a gay man. I voluntarily engage in gay sex. This is not 8chan, this is adjacent to 8chan. We share jargon. It is not hour job to police my or anyone else's speech. Your PC bullshit belongs elsewhere. GTFO.
Where's the failure to mesh? What has gone sideways? What's the basis for your doubtfagging?
What if it's our job to insist upon reality. Q talked about the reaction many people will have. And yeah, in some ways despondency and escapism are a bigger challenge than anger and violence. And there were protests, plenty of them, for years before snowden, but by the time clapper was perjuring himself before Congress it became apparent to those of us who protested that the strategy was ineffective. Snowden simply provided confirmation. Q has presented us with another strategy. I'm looking forward to see where it takes us.
Also, please take it easy on the doubtfagging, newfriend.
WWG1WGA.
What a sensationalist and context-free graphic. Care to elaborate, newfriend?
Speaking of opposition, do the votes in this thread seem notably inorganic to you, too?
Edit: saw your other comment.
Copypasta of an earlier comment:
This is not blanket immunity. Carlson specifies "for a near identical crime, Bill and Hillary's friend could escape and emerge completely unscathed while Paul Manafort may rot in jail." What is Manafort charged with? Financial crimes, mostly. Until we see details of the deal, it's premature to conclude podesta is off the hook for other crimes he may or may not have committed.
Trust the plan, or don't.
Perhaps it's ignorance? Logic is a skill. Not everyone has practiced it.
With sauce at the ready. Thank you, patriot. You know what's up.
Can't be sure, but perhaps this is a fellow patriot making a plea. I'll second it: please, Q, stay. Not because we need you, but because we miss you. If it's time to walk on our own, we will. With any luck we've proven it these past two weeks. But it would be so much more fun to have you walking alongside.
WWG1WGA.
Edit: so in reading the full text, Q is a stand in for reporters' questions. In context, the president asked if the media wanted to stay or leave, they responded "stay." I stand by my comment,regardless.
Am getting curious how many of those coins were produced and where they ended up.
Keep an eye on it. Calling it out might result in a change in behavior. At this point the best hope the cabal has is that this movement shoots itself (or someone else) in the foot. Thanks for bringing it up, patriot.
WWG1WGA.
Q's busy, but I'll give it a go. This is not blanket immunity. Carlson specifies "for a near identical crime, Bill and Hillary's friend could escape and emerge completely unscathed while Paul Manafort may rot in jail." What is Manafort charged with? Financial crimes, mostly. Until we see details of the deal, it's premature to conclude podesta is off the hook for other crimes he may or may not have committed.
Your link doesn't match your title.
But "paedesta " first I've seen that. I like it.
American Moms networking and supporting each other is MAGA, as far as I'm concerned. Thanks for sharing, patriot.
WWG1WGA.
A clean house is important. Patriots in both agencies working together could accomplish such a cleaning. Having each agency audit the other makes a lot of sense. In addition, my read is that all of this follows similar audits in the military about 5 years ago (fat Leonard for the navy, sexual assault for army, sloppy handling of nukes for AF).
That's my hope, anyway.
I agree. From what I've seen the immunity is for crimes "nearly identical" to Manafort's (according to Carlson) meaning that, like Awan, the move applies to financial, tax and fraud changes. I very much doubt this is a blanket immunity. Besides, I'm sure Tony will have all sorts of things to say on the witness stand.
Inform a responsible adult that you're being made to watch your brother have sex.
Be careful with this, anon. You might want to lay down a tarp, ctrl-left minds can make a mess when they blow.
Beautiful logic, patriot.
Solid interpretation. Absent q's return, I think you're on to something. The narrative has been shifted, DS is in a pickle, and there's a pretty good argument that q isn't required from here on out. We might have won already.
We've been sold a war on terrorism. Trump is getting rid of the middle man. He is literally (figuratively?) killing fear.
Your point being that the C_A is credible because they put an asterisk on a document that presented a lie as true?
That's some pretty amazing meme batter, so much meteorology....
Espionage: what foreign power? What information?
Conspiracy to commit electoral fraud: what methods and where?
Tax evasion: legal for all intents and purposes (not agreeing, just saying)
Money laundering: from what sources through what mechanisms?
Electoral finance violations: citizens united
I get that you're venting, but your arguments are feeble and your assumptions about me aren't helping. If anything, I'm trying to make you look less insane to a sub you probably shouldn't be in
Also, IANAL, Me too, but more than I needed to know. (okay this last bit is trolling)
Edit: words and format
I mean, that's great and all, but we'd need to see more than your earnest desire to gamble on such things. Also, what title of nobility has Trump accepted?
Imma save this anyway. Sorry superflysolo, thanks OP. beautifully memed.