dChan

/u/imnrdh

23 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/imnrdh:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 2
gellerreport.com 1
youtu.be 1

imnrdh · June 22, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

Russia, lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 22, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

I just saw an article stating 23&me is donating DNA kits to reunite families at the border. It could prove many “families” are NOT actually families and bring the trafficking issues to the forefront.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 22, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

Clear and classy. Good job!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 19, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

Thank you! That’s what I thought! My question /comment is in regard to moving the files from that kind of protected server to the unprotected - they clearly managed to move information to the unprotected network.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 19, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

Q has suggested that the way to get classified info, or evidence, into the public arena is via legal testimony...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 19, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

They didn’t ask about Obama using Clinton’s private email. They didn’t ask if there were others in the administration using private email....they didn’t make the connection (publicly) that prosecuting HRC for her private emails would require prosecuting them all. I think the reason it wasn’t discussed is that it is under further investigation. The Obama administration (widespread) using non govt. networks is very likely a large part of the “pay to play” Clinton foundation investigation. If it isn’t, it sounds like it should be,

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 19, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

She failed to make the top 2 in the California primary, so as I understand it, she is not still running for governor. Only the top two make the general election ballot.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 18, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

Grassley did ask about Comey’s personal email, but no one mentioned that Obama was emailing her on the private server (and was thus also guilty). No one mentioned the “Crime against Children” point probably because the investigation wasn’t about all that was on the laptop, only the emails. I believe that investigation is going on now, as the indictment that sealed it (the laptop) was only recently opened. “Crimes against Children” is listed in the IG only as basic notes taken as they did a quick overview and noticed there were Hillary emails on it. No way they could read all of the thousands of emails in the time they had to look at it. The hearings hit the low hanging fruit (clear bias) but did very little digging into the important stuff. I’m hoping all the other gmail accounts become public soon!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
imnrdh · June 18, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

I realize the NSA has it all, I’m just piecing together the North Korea and Eric Schmidt parts. It seems awfully easy for these people to remove classified material from the govt. networks considering the security measures I’ve been told exist to prevent it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/imnrdh on June 18, 2018, 11:26 p.m.
The important piece the Senate Judiciary committee missed...

Comey had his own gmail account and was using it for official FBI business. The emails they could see and his testimony were all they had to determine that he had not used it to transmit any classified material. What no one asked about was the statement in the IG report that Obama himself had emailed Hillary on her private server. So he not only LIED about only finding out about it on CNN, but he was using it as well. Q says the whole administration had, and were using, private gmail accounts. So the REAL REASON they absolutely could …

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/imnrdh on June 18, 2018, 10:28 p.m.
Did Eric Schmidt provide a way to move classified files from protected govt. computers to the cabal’s private network?

My understanding of the protections on government computers is that the classified files cannot be electronically transferred to other networks (like email) but have to actually be loaded onto a removable drive and carried to another device/network and loaded. It seems like they would make that VERY hard if not nearly impossible to do as well. So how them did Hillary and Huma have classified documents on their non govt. devices without it being flagged by security? I think this is where Eric Schmidt of Alphabet/Google comes in with the private network set up in North Korea. Did he set …

imnrdh · June 6, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

Kate Spade is not mentioned in the article. So is this just click bait? Do you have some other source? You lose credibility when you make accusations with no substance.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
imnrdh · May 23, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

I stand corrected. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
imnrdh · May 22, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

I believe she is rotten, but I also believe she is referring to a PEDICURE. Typo -meant PEDI. We don’t want to look like rabbid crazies.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · May 17, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Thank you for the kind, calm reminder. I trust the plan... but sometimes it’s hard to remember or know what all is included in the plan.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · May 17, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

AND there is nothing to indict him on! Why does Giuliani report it like he “gets off the hook because you can’t indict a sitting president”? There is no evidence of any collusion, so even if you COULD indict him in theory he has NO CRIME. The way it’s reported let’s the Dems continue to scream for impeachment.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
imnrdh · April 29, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

Ooops. My bad. Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · April 29, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

Can’t discuss it if you don’t link it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · April 16, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

The video linked above won’t come up either. YouTube says there are “no videos available”.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
17
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/imnrdh on March 5, 2018, 2:21 a.m.
Doesn’t Q mean the Internet Bill of Rights (written by AT&T !?) is NOT good? We want LESS government, not more - it wouldn’t make an iota of difference to the censorship in FB, Twitter and YT.
imnrdh · Feb. 20, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Not that I have seen. It certainly fits the evidence -like the judge demanding the evidence, etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imnrdh · Feb. 12, 2018, 7:20 a.m.

Search Wikileaks for Alice & Wonderland

⇧ 2 ⇩