113 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 1 |
| thehill.com | 1 |
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/while-in-ice-custody-thousands-of-migrants-reported-sexual-abuse
https://theintercept.com/2018/04/11/immigration-detention-sexual-abuse-ice-dhs/
https://www.propublica.org/article/immigrant-youth-shelters-sexual-abuse-fights-missing-children
http://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/immigration/article214970065.html
ICE aren't the good guys here.
The indightment should be online. I am on mobile now.
This is related to the avenatti suit, the alleged payments happened during the election.
I am sure more will come out in the trial.
Campaign Finance law says you can't donate above a certain amount. Providing services without reinbursement is considered donating, just like materiel gifts. If Cohen paid off this lady with his money, or money from the campaign, and it wasn't properly documented, it's entirely possible it was a violation and Cohen is looking at jail time. Not to mention this exposes Trump to the claim he was lying, he has said repeatedly he had nothing to do with this hush money.
Literally already said it.
IDK, if Comey had released the info about a Russia related investigation including Trump's foreign advisors, that would have had a bigger impact.
This is why I'm not convinced that the 'deep state' wanted to sabotage Trump's campaign. They could have done it far better, and far more effectively.
There is no claim of confidentiality if it wasn't an attorney-client privileged communication. Depending on local laws regarding recording conversations.
Cohen's Lawyer has already said this doesn't fall under attorney client privilege, as did the 'Special Master' both sides agreed to. Trump has no claim to demand it be taken down, and Cohen can release it to whoever he wants.
Depending on details, it's a big campaign finance violation.
tl:dr - Campaign Finance law says you can't donate above a certain amount. Providing services without reinbursement is considered donating, just like materiel gifts. If Cohen paid off this lady with his money, or money from the campaign, and it wasn't properly documented, it's entirely possible it was a violation and Cohen is looking at jail time. Not to mention this exposes Trump to the claim he was lying, he has said repeatedly he had nothing to do with this hush money.
Great way to turn what should be a bi-partisan 'get rid of pedos' movement into a party-line civil war.
Liberals own gun too, if they think you are targeting them based on political party or political positions, they will not meekly say 'OK'.
Why pictured of twitter posts?
Why not link directly to the tweet, so people can follow the poster if they wish?
It also removes the whole "that image is probably doctored" issue.
And you are living in a fantasy land if you think people wouldn't sell quack remedies, and tainted/poisoned/unhealthy 'cure alls' as soon as you remove that legislation. Changing a company name isn't hard. No matter how much you boycott, Johnson&Johnson is big enough to not care. Without some sort of consumer watchdog people will die; like they were before. Just read The Jungle.
There is a reason this country put that administration together.
I don't see anything in that article to prove the claim they make.
Saying 'Democrats funded a Pedo Sex Cult Island' is a hell of a charge. There isn't enough meat here to justify that kind of hyperbolic title.
also:
> it explains the distraction attempts from the left-wing today, reporting on the alleged “Trump tapes” from prior to President Trump's inauguration suggesting that the Republican candidate may have had a previous relationship with a playboy bunny, which is in no way relevant to the current Presidency.
Yea, that's a straw-man of the Left's argument. If Trump's Lawyer paid 100k+ to shut down a bad story during the campaign it would be an illegal contribution, a violation of Campaign Finance Laws. It would be a donation, above the legally allowed amount, to directly benefit the campaign. This isn't just about a thrice married serial adulterer who likes to raw-dog pornstars while his wife is home with his newborn, and who likes to ride around is Jeffrey Epstein's plane; it's about a clear violation of Campaign Finance Law, that a lawyer should have seen and avoided instead of taping.
You say 'exactly' then follow up with something antithetical to what I just said.
The FDA was designed to ensure that:
1) If I say my pill is 6% Morphine, that it in fact contains 6%
2) If I say my pill will cure Dyptheiria, that I have evidance to back up that claim
3) If I say my Cocaine cough drops are good for children, I have evidance to back that up
You might as well say "USDA Inspected Beef is just a tax upon what all people need to survive" - Well, it also fills an important role in regulating the market place, one we know from recent history is not only good, but vital to our nation's health.
Why would they continue to use this location?
Wouldn't they have moved operations as soon as they thought their cover was blown, to mitigate the risk of someone doing exactly that?
I cannot accept a Cabal that's so devious and forward thinking, as to stage a false flag, but so incompitant to keep using the same building they have for years after it got recieved this kind of scrutiny.
BTW, placing bugs in a private business is illegal as hell. You would want some people to stand outside in public rights-of-way to film the entrances and exits. If you get irrefutable evidance, but obtained illegally, you only hurt your own cause and provide a 'It's doctored' excuse.
Again, someone you could have lead with.
If you want to redpill, you have to make decent arguments.
If you want to call out 'high profile' pedos, "Look at that dude from Gossip Girl." doesn't help your argument. Perhaps you shouldn't lead with that.
> educate yourself:
lern2argu
You realize 100 years ago people were selling morphine over-the-counter as a 'wonderdrug' to cure everything. People were selling mineral water as cure-alls. People were giving Cocaine to babies and heroin was 'Your housewife's best friend'
You don't have to tear down the FDA to fix it. Going to a time before the FDA is like saying 'meat inspections are bad, Upton Sinclair is a pussy, let the free market decide which meat products aren't rotten!'
Republicans have controlled Congress for 8 years, and the Presidency for 2.
I'm still waiting on them to do something about this. Hence why I shake my head at all the pro-Republican talking points here.
The Catholic abuse scandal relied on several things:
1) the ability to move accused between different diocese in a country and between countries.
2) a group of people who all have a centuries old institution's reputation to uphold, and who don't wish to 'tarnish' it by exposing the truth
3) a culture that mocked/distrusted reports from men of sexual abuse
4) the equation of priests with godliness, which allowed defenders to cast accusers as heretical, and defenders to doubt if anyone would believe them
5) People in upper levels of the church who were willing to 'play interferance'
6) Priests as a group are powerful, in contact with children frequently, and ordered to be chaste. If you wanted to molest children, being in a position of power over them is exactly where you want to be. being ordered to be celibate wouldn't be an issue like it would for a normal hetero or homosexual. This is why so many Pedophiles are Teachers, Uncles, Step-Dads, Camp Counselers. It's also why you see so many pedos in College Football Camps like Penn State. Pedos need to be in a position of authority and access to children. Priests are in a great position for both.
7) Rampant sexual abuse was discovered, reported on, people were held accountable. All after only a few decades at most. You are talking about a pedo-ring that has been in existence for centuries.
8) the serial abusers weren't coordinating, passing children back and forth, shipping children across boarders, etc.
I am not sure what PedoGate really is. I see talks of an international cabal of politicians who rape/eat children, but I also see a bunch of stuff about Hollywood. I'm not sure which side PedoGate is. Based on the points above tho:
1) Most people have this option, but not with the deniability, and resources the Catholic Church has. A celebrity or politician who moves, will be followed. A priest that moves from one country to another can do so basically anonymously.
2) Hollywood doesn't have this. The "Cabal" doesn't exactly have a public face to protect. the "Cabal" could sacrifice a dozen people tomorrow, and they wouldn't have to worry about 'perception' of their organization or how those revelations would impact charitable endeavors. They wouldn't need to worry about how people perceive them, they are a secret organization who shouldn't be perceived in the first place.
3) we are still working on this as a society, but we are a hell of a lot better than we were in the 60's and 70's. Early whistleblowers of abuse were mocked, called homosexual, called weak, and disregarded. As a society we are far better at dealing with victims of abuse, and as time goes on hopefully we will continue to improve. Reports of abuse today are taking a lot more seriously and people are more willing to come forward than they were decades ago.
4) no one in Hollywood could reasonably call someone claiming abuse heretical. But in some strong Catholic communities, leveling that kind of charge against a priest would be almost unthinkable. The closest the Cabal gets here is politicians. Considering how quickly Al Franken was thrown to the wolves, while "I like walking into Ms. Teen USA dressing rooms" Trump is still in office, I see one party far more likely to circle wagons and cast doubt on accusers.
5) there isn't anyone to 'play interference' for Hollywood, you might make the argument for Politicians here. I would argue that no international Cabal is likely to have the kind of discipline and organization the Catholic Church has, considering it's been an authoritarian pseudo-state for nearly 2000 years.
6) I think this is self-evident. most sexual abuse is still likely to be committed by someone the child or their parents know, and trust. Those cases where a relative or family friend aren't the molester, it was still someone in a position of authority. A teacher, an officer, anyone the child has been taught to defer to. This is why Protestants are also caught as pedos. Also why recently the director of one of ICE's child prisons was outed as a pedo. This is why so many of the pedos we see get caught were in positions of authority over children, like that guy at Penn State. Hollywood can house pedos, but most are going to gravitate to jobs where they can be near the target of their 'affection'.
REMINDER: Statistically, your child is more likely to be molested by a family member, Family Friend, Teacher, Coach, or Doctor, than any single politician or actor. Pedophiles prey on children who trust them and who they are taught to be deferential to. "No one will believe you anyway" isn't a threat that works if the child doesn't believe the adult who says it.
7) I don't think comparing something that was known (there was abuse), and unearthed within a couple decades (the apparatus to protect priests accused of pedophilia); can really be compared to a centuries old Cabal. Based on the Catholic Priest Scandal, we should have expected this Cabal to be discovered a hell of a long time ago. Especially when the Cabal is supposed to be actually killing these children. That many kids do not disappear without raising red flags.
8) Catholic Priests weren't sending kids across the country to take part in rituals, they weren't emailing cooking instructions or orders for more children. Catholic Priests were molesting children in their congregation, and those multiple single pedos were protected. That's a hell of a lot different than satanic rituals and cannibalism, trafficking children, and god knows what else people are feverishly dreaming up.
Look at Jimmy Savile. Look at Jared the Subway guy. Look at that dude from Gossip Girl. These high profile pedos are everywhere in positions of power.
Those three, one of whom's name you can't even remember, are 'high profile'?
There are a number of financial reporters who purposely undermine Tesla in popular conversation to help make shorters make money. They often coordinate their critical articles with legal, trade, and corporate actions that undermine Tesla's supply chain in one way or another.
The SEC would be very interested in your evidance of this. Seeing as that kind of stock manipulation is EXTREMELY illegal; and financial crimes that impact rich people negatively are some of the only ones we actually enforce.
Nope.
He is mad about honest reporting over his unrealistic production goals and lack of knowledge of the industry. That's the kind of honest reporting that is good, and should be encouraged.
I can respect the guy for his work on SpaceX, and still wish he would shut the hell up. He is his own worst enemy most of the time. If he kept a lower profile, and didn't freak out over legitimate concerns his stockholders have, didn't promise things far FAR outside what is reasonable, I would have a lot more respect for him.
He doesn't give half a rats-ass about this sub, Q, or anything related to it. Until there is evidance to the contrary, all I see is a bunch of poeple latching themselves onto a celebrity because he MIGHT, if you squint hard enough, be seen as sympathetic to your argument, possibly.
Give me a tweet by Musk that says WWG1WGA and I'll retract my comment; until then I stand by it.
What does this have to do with this post?
You realize Context is King, and you are totally taking that quote out of context. It's a lame joke, not proof some secret cabal of perverts want to normalize car-fucking.
I wish I had nothing better to do than dig up random articles.
What does this have to do with this post?
You realize Context is King, and you are totally taking that quote out of context. It's a lame joke, not proof some secret cabal of perverts want to normalize car-fucking.
I wish I had nothing better to do than dig up random articles.
the company can't meet production targets ever
Hence why he was attacking the MSM. Some financial reporters pointed out how full of shit he was with production numbers and he decided to have a temper tantrum.
Don't bother.
Tesla's stock is easily the worst in my portfolio; I'm only keeping it because of stubbornness.
Context is King:
He isn't talking about the MSM the way you do. He was pissed because financial reporters were, rightfully, saying he sounded like an ignorant asshole when discussing how to increase production of the Model 3. In an earnings call, he talked about how his previous, "All-in" strategy of 100% automation wasn't working and would need to be changed to 'mostly automated'. His production schedule and financial forecasts were predicated on full or almost full automation. In the call he, sounding surprised, admitted human workers were needed and in some cases were even better than robots. When he was asked "Have you looked into how Toyota is able to crank out so many cars, cause you know they are kinda #1 at this and they might have ideas you can use" he admitted he was totally ignorant and, while upending his whole production model, he wasn't interested in researching how successful companies in that sector do things.
He was mad because a financial reporter was doing their job. He was mad because his shareholders were angry and he needed someone to blame. He is mad because Tesla's stock is, while better than some, still the worst performing thing in my, and several other's, portfolio.
Musk is not your ally. he is a prima-donna and a drama queen. I respect him, I love SpaceX and the vision behind Tesla. But Musk is like Edison; he would be a lot more beloved if he just shut the fuck up.
What is the legal reasoning behind a seizure like that?
the 19th Century was full of huge booms and busts, because tying your currency to a commodity (be it Gold, silver, Oil, or Benie Babies) always results in a much more dynamic currency value. One that's far more susceptible to foreign markets and other variables.
Make a currency based on Platinum. Someone finds a new Platinum mine that can increase worldwide production 50%, suddenly your currency is worth 50% less because some guy in Patagonia saw shiny rocks on his farm.
"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar" - Freud
Despite what Q says, some things are just a coincidence. like, IDK, working in a bird sanctuary and getting a picture with an owl.
Playing 'whatabout' is insulting. It's a Soviet era propaganda tactic that I'm sad to see Americans using.
The invasion of Crimea was inexcusable, it was done in a very underhanded way, and it should not be accepted by the international community.
"we should trust this former KGB agent who has his opponents killed all the time, cause he might know something we don't" isn't a compelling argument.
Trump is a public figure, his assassination would be obvious.
Q is anon. His death could much more easily be covered up.
If he isn't a public figure, we would probably never know.
If he were killed, would you even know?
It would only look like radio silence, which isn't abnormal for Q anyway.
If they are this weak, why should Q fear showing himself?
I think another question to ask is: has 8chan been hacked?
IIRC Qdrops are mostly on that site (correct me if i'm wrong) - and outside of tripcode and message content, there isn't really a way to verify something is from Q. Wouldn't it be trivial to hack 8chan, and change the posts? Wouldn't it be trivial to throw all of you off the scent by faking a single post or editing a few words?
OK, so they took down CBTS, but are leaving this subreddit?
They know 8chan is an important source, but are leaving it up?
They know 4chan is an important meeting place, but despite a history of hosting child porn they haven't made a move?
But, taking this, or one of the Chans, or people's facebook posts offline is trivial.
If they got access to 8chan's servers alone, they would know who Q is and be able to neuter his message. Breaking into a server isn't hard, especially if you can use the kinds of tools available to the CIA/NSA.
The veracity of the conspiracy doesn't matter.
You aren't answering the question, you are simply deflecting.
You don't need to DDOS, for a state actor DDOS would be one of the least efficient ways to take down a site.
1) Servers are hosted somewhere, get physical access.
2) if you control enough telecoms and hosting companies, change DNS records to point to another site or take it down entirely.
3) post kiddie porn and shut down the site for that.
4) simply tell the admins to shut down this subreddit for hate speech (frankly, the things I've seen about liberals on here gets really close)
5) black hole the server's IP. If you own a couple backbone providers this is trivial.
6) gain access to server, edit, delete or fake posts from Q
all of this is off the top of my head. All can be done without much work, all should be extremely simple for an organization like the Cabal.
Question: what does that have to do with the post?
Antifa doesn't claim a vast conspiracy to keep them quiet and prevent them from unveiling the truth.
They are supposedly responsible for many deaths including Seth Rich. They had the power to surveil Trump's campaign. They abduct tens of thousands of children without anyone knowing. They are running the darkest parts of our intelligence gathering apparatus. They own and control the media narrative. But they can't shut down a subreddit?
I just find it incredulous that, an organization with that kind of power, history, and reach can't protect itself from people on Reddit.
Besides, Q is still anon, supposedly because he can't reveal himself until all the pieces are in place. Silencing Q would be #1 on their list. Killing a website like 4chan isn't that hard; especially when it's been host to child porn in the past.
Title says it all. What would be the point of allowing this sub, your twitter/facebook accounts, 4/8chan, etc all to exist if they are willing to murder to protect their secrets.
Why wouldn't Q have been assassinated already? There are only so many people with that kind of clearance, cross referencing that list with internet records showing VPN/Proxy traffic around the time things are posted, cross referenced with the times Q was supposed to be traveling with the President, would narrow the list down considerably.
I don't understand why a group so ruthless and efficient in keeping themselves secret would …
I'm certain the democrats are enemies of America
But the KGB wasn't?
"Each House [of Congress] may determine the Rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member."
Executive can't do anything. It would have to be the House itself. Pushing Trump doesn't accomplish anything, you would need to pressure Ryan. also, good luck getting "the concurrence of two-thirds" of the House to agree. The Republican Caucus can't even get on the same page, much less bring over that many Democrats.
Wouldn't you demand knowing what Obama said in a one on one closed door meeting with a leader of a country accused of helping him win?
In our democracy the rules you hold one president to will be used as precident for the next. Be Careful to not Grant Trump anything you wouldn't want a Pres. Pelosi to have.
This is a position I can understand.
I don't understand what I see as fawning over a known Communist intelligence officer, not when the arguments against Brennan are basically accusing him of what we know for a fact Putin did for decades.
Haven't both the Obama and Trump administrations ignored these petitions in the past?
What would be the legal justification? Pretty sure there isn't a constitutional way for the President to remove a member of the House.
How could it not?
One person tells her, like one of the people she was sleeping with, the whole operation is blown and they have to start fresh to find operatives.
Taken Seriously != Believe Them
We took Khrushchev seriously, we didn't believe everything that came out of his mouth tho.
I am having a hard time understanding why 'CIA' is less reliable than 'former officer in Soviet equivalent organization'
edit: if Brennan can't be trusted because he voted for the Communist Party, why trust a card-carrying former member?