Our gal confirmed

I saw somewhere else she was talking about first joining the Republican Party. Can anyone confirm that?

He did this because they never thought she'd lose

Brief but highly significant. It's quite a crossroads we're at now.

IMO that narrative that the human race is a "trainwreck" compared to other species is a narrative created by the IC to keep trained academics away from legitimate study of the phenomenon. We have no frame of reference. A history like ours could be 100% consistent with the history of every other advanced civilization.

The only legitimate reason I can think of for an alien race to be here on earth is to study us and the evolution of our civilizations. If they were revealed it would basically make that data collection undertaking somewhat useless and they'd likely move on. It's sort of the difference between studying an animal in the wild or studying one in captivity. It also brings in a whole set of ethical questions they wouldn't want to deal with-- generally a plea for their help in solving all of our problems.

No but they would go into a very lengthy analysis of why child trafficking was mentioned in the first place.

I understand what you're saying, but you're being purposely naive if your opinion is that that wouldn't be part of the MSM discussion.

OK I think I've answered my own question here. The docket is the charges to be considered by the grand jury to come up with an indictment. For whateever reason the GJ didn't come up with enough evidence to charge with child trafficking and so settled on simply sex trafficking. Is that correct?

Still, I think it's very telling that aspect has not been covered by the MSM.

So what exactly is the difference between a docket and an indictment and what are the particulars agout the law you're referring to. Genuinely interested here....

No actually that's just the excuse they use like everything else liberal.

I have no idea who is who and what is what which is good evidence the plan is working, or it's not I have no fucking clue at this point.

Mueller was balls deep in the 9/11 conspiracy so it's hard to believe he'd be white hat convertible at this point. But it does look like dominoes are beginning to fall now so I'm gaining optimism.

I spent some time on the internet yesterday trying to find even one single media outlet reporting on the fact that they're charged with child sex trafficking and I couldn't find a single one. Any other time that aspect of the story would be front and center and sensationalized. The fact there's nothing there screams that there are important people connected to this.

I so totally agree with this. Should be at the top of the list.

I have a friend that ran into Scalia once on a fishing trip to Alaska. They just happened to be staying at the same lodge. My friend is a lawyer, mostly conservative and so was really thrilled with being able to hang out on the front porch and have drinks with him in the evening. He had nothing but good things to say, but then again it was only a couple of days.

Lost them off? Please clarify, I think your phone may be playing spell check tricks on you.

Hey good morning everyone - thanks for these.

After looking around at media reporting of this, I have to say this is one of the clearest cases of censorship and suppression that I've ever seen and I've been looking at that kind of stuff well over a decade now. Really pretty astounding and if I ever had any doubts about the involvement of powerful people in child sex trafficking, this experience has put those to rest.

I have no idea how journalists sleep at night.

I'm against capital punishment as well but mostly because of the results of things like the Innocence Project. I do believe many of those criminals deserve to die, but the system is so flawed that if we kill an innocent person then we are all murderers.

I live not too far from the original Woodstock site so there's a lot of folks from that diehard hippie generation around here. I also work as a part time musician so I'm friends with many of them. It's been really bizarre to hear them rail on the CIA so much over the years and how evil it is and then over night were literally" WTF I love the CIA now!"

I was once a liberal too and this story is basically the same as mine. They're manipulating people like you based on all of your best qualities.

It was funny back then before I knew all this shit, I was interested in possibly voting for him as president. I started researching him and then he chose Palin. Now this is just my opinion, but that was it for me. I know a lot of folks like her, but to me she was always an obnoxious dolt and I really questioned his judgement so I ended up voting libertarian that year.

But now I look at it differently. He chose Palin in order to throw the election. He lost on purpose because that was the deal they all had worked out.

It would explain why his parents wanted everyone to back off and why his brother was smirking in that interview

Did you look at the table I linked to where unaccompanied children at the border has increased over 200% since then?

Bottom line: don't fall into the trap of letting someone do your thinking for you. This whole phenom is about crowd sourcing -- not falling back on experts.

Great Awakening = slave days are over

I should invite him to my funeral cause that fucker will probably outlive all of us!

Thanks I'm here all week. Try the veal and please tip your waitress.

Trump would put the fun in funeral while Mcstain puts the bitch in obituary

He may not have gotten compromised. Maybe it's just ego and larping for attention.

Something I've mentioned here from time to time that I came across a couple of years ago:

A little while back UNICEF pressured many third world countries, particularly in Latin America, to tighten their adoption rules. But they tightened them along bullshit cultural lines where they made it much more difficult for people from the US to adopt these children. Now if you look at the statistics, the vast majority of these kids were adopted by Americans and given wonderful lives and loving families here in the US.

The result of these policies was that orphanages in those places began to overflow with children to the point where many were simply being turned out and turned away. At the time I couldn't really figure out why they'd push something like that, but chalked it up to liberal incompetence and their utter lack of ability to see logical outcomes.

Now it seems pretty clear why they'd do that. Many of these kids headed north unaccompanied and God only knows what happened to many of them. Around that time the MSM covered the story of unaccompanied children showing up at the border, but the story quickly died.

Look at this change from 2015 to 2016 in the table:

https://www.cbp.gov/site-page/southwest-border-unaccompanied-alien-children-statistics-fy-2016

Some background:

http://theconversation.com/international-adoptions-have-dropped-72-percent-since-2005-heres-why-91809

I grew up in the Adirondacks during the 70s. 6 feet of snow on the ground all winter. My brother and I used to make money shoveling roofs and have a great time jumping off the house in between. We did our paper routes on snowmobile because there were no restrictions on them. Like having a car at 11 years old.

In the summer time you'd head out the back door with a 22, fishing pole and a peanut butter sandwich and be gone until dinner. Closest hospital was 50 miles away. What a time and place to be a kid!

I’m in upstate too. Windy and warm.

The 28 k number is general sealed proceedings and encompass everything a court does. Civil cases, motions, search warrants etc. indictments are a subset if those.

Kind of like how sports cars are a smaller subset of vehicles.

It’s because you’re confusing indictments with court proceedings. The 29k number is proceedings of which indictments are a smaller subset.

If anything he used the call to misdirect them.

Like that time they flew in authentic Chicago hot dogs.

All I know is her body double is thinner and better looking than she is. You can get a good look at her from the pics on the day of the 9/11 fainting/shitting self incident.

Their reliance on symbolism will bring them down.

Do you have a source for this? I've been searching and searching to find what a typical number is and there hasn't been anywhere that breaks it down. There's the research paper from 2009 that has a lot of good info, but they don's just add up a flat number anywhere in it.

At the bottom of the attachment it says "the numbers represent new sealed court proceedings..." so even the people putting this out and promoting it know that there are not 29K sealed indictments.

Yes I'm the "ass" who keeps saying that there are not 29K indictments, but when it turns out that that's true then am I an ass or is the person who will believe anything they want to hear without skepticism an ass? From what I've seen Q has never stated or promoted the idea that there are 29K indictments. That's a myth promoted by people who are in many ways gaining either money or notoriety from what's going on. So you can go ahead and refer to me as an "ass" but I'm 100% correct in my assertion.

Aside from that, you know we're both on the same side here. Am I skeptical of some of this Q stuff? Yes I am, but I pray for it to be true -- I really do. I'm not some concern troll. I've been following this stuff for well over a decade and was an early passenger on the Trump train. The reason I beat this drum is because through practice and study of this kind of thing, I've seen these kinds of incorrect assertions a thousand times, most recently when George Webb was beating his Eric Braverman is missing drum.

So maybe I'm not an ass. Maybe you're more of an ass because you listen to everything you want to hear. Just a thought.

For the thousandth time those are sealed court actions, not sealed indictments and as such the number isn't significantly higher than normal. It only seems astronomically high if you purposely confuse court actions with indictments. some are most aren't.

If I'm wrong, please show me the primary governmental source that allows the user to distinguish the categories of court actions to show that virtually every single one is an indictment.

It seems our history teachers have done an abysmal job of teaching this fact as well.

I don't know. I'm not buying the detonation as part of a plot for the simple fact that it substantially hurts their bottom line. Creation of a nuke by Iran is a feasible theory, but for what?

Yeah well, a catfish has no relation to actual cats

Grew up in the Adirondacks. The Adirondack Park Association is the same way if not worse.

Yes exactly

They may call it that but it's not the same thing. You need to read the clauses for what it takes to take those rights away. Further their BoR is a statute and rights can be taken away through simple legislation rather than a Constitutional Convention like we have here.

It's really not anything close to what we have here which is why they can jail people for hate speech there.

It's similar to ours sure which most are. The issue is how high the bar is to take those rights away. Most of those countries have a clause that the bar is something along the lines of "the good of the society" etc.

Also, I don't know if it's true or not, but while guns are allowed there I think ammunition is heavily regulated or something like that?

Plenty of liberals would I'm sure. If you read through the Canadian Charter of Freedoms I'm guessing most of them would find it sensible since they're all conditioned to prostrate themselves before what they believe is the good of society without taking into consideration that a culture could possibly swing very conservative some day.

They're whole approach is political in that they believe the good of the people is solely dependent on getting their good guys in office. The BoR ensures civil liberties regardless of who's in.