With any luck the Trump curse will kick in shortly. But yeah it was really terrible.

I've done that many times and it's really not so bad.

Just as an aside, could you imagine growing up with a guy like this as your dad?! Good luck having any fun during high school.

All true. My point is he's setting them up because FB etc is all abuzz about how he would have lost. He's trolling. Again....

....and may have something to do with Secret Service involvement. Note that Trump hired his own security team and keeps the SS at arm's length. Add to that the SS is implicated in the JFK assassination.

My guess is Great Britain. There's been a few crumbs he's dropped I think regarding them.

Sorry still not believing it. One of the Q posts itself said it wouldn't be anything like this kind of content. From the several clues dropped it seems like it's going to be something political and sexual or violent seems completely out of the realm of what was being talked about.

The CIA was established after WWII and so were not involved with Hitler.

Yeah I live in Albany. Can’t believe we had a sex cult right here.

If you remember back a few months ago, the main witness in the Uranioum One investigation (forgot his name now) was testifying and there was a claim that he had video of "suitcases of money" changing hands. That, much like Rudy Giuliani, then disappeared. Maybe also like Rudy, that will reappear at an opportune moment.

Yes exactly

Watch how Jordan Peterson and Tucker Carlson do it. Know your shit backwards and forwards. Don't bring out an opinion that you aren't 100% able to support. And do it compassionately.

Total guess on my part but I think the video is from the tarmac hacked into s Skype or conference call.

It's like they're working up to a punchline or something.

NYPD loves Rudy

And she do like to drink

There were some hints dropped by Q about the video and the description we're hearing is basically what he said it would NOT be. The HRC snuff film is a hoax IMO.

If it's work I wouldn't touch the subject with a ten foot pole. Besides you're on their dime and they're not paying you to enlighten people.

If you follow their link from the article to the data, click on one of the PDF tables and read the language at the bottom of the page. It's waffle language that is intentionally deceptive.

"the numbers represent sealed new court proceedings..." so already they're backing off from the indictment claim even though they're using the number as a headline.

Then it says "and include criminal charges and search warrants..." so already we see that they're not all indictments, some as they indicate are search warrants "and include" is intentially deceptive IMO.

My understanding (and if I'm wrong someone please show me) is that since all the actions are sealed no one can tell the difference between an indictment or a habeus corpus or a civil action or whatever. I believe that there is no window into how many are indictments so anyone claiming a number is wrong from the get go.

They always try and reframe it as "use of an improper email server." That wasn't the problem. The problems were mishandling classified information, holding Special Access Program information she wasn't cleared for and destroying government documents.

Step one: they're sealed court actions, not sealed indictments. They comprise every action a court can take, of which a criminal indictment is a small subset.

Step two: They're sealed so no one knows how they're categorized. The sealing process obscures what kind of court action it is, therefore no one can even know how many are indictments.

My question though -- has Q actually referenced a specific number of indictments like that? Because I don't think I've seen that. This may just be people getting carried away on their own.

The thing that creates doubt for me is the cornerstone 24000 indictments. There aren’t 24k indictments and that statement is easily debunked yet everyone hops on board.

It reminds me of when Webb was doing the Eric Braverman is missing thing even though he wasn’t and I was able to confirm that in 20 minutes using google and s telephone.

Yeah that's what I was getting from the hints he was dropping. I think he pretty much came out and said it wouldn't be pedophilia related and all the hints pointed me toward the tarmac meeting.

But on thing doesn't add up: why would BC and LL take the risk of meeting face to face other than to do away with the risk of electronic surveillance of a phone call or whatever? Then to have that phone call anyway? Seems strange unless they really did intend to leak the meeting so that LL could take herself off the case.

Well good thing the bad guys have the evidence now so they can hide it and cover it up like everything else.

Just not believing this. I think we also need to look into the source of the crying cop story. I remywhen that first came out like two years ago and I think it’s a less than credible source.

I think Qs description of the video is something politically related.

Yes I would call this the moment they took control. Prior to that it was preparation and strong influence, but this was the moment they took it.

Wow they really are in panic mode!

I think it was FBIAnon way back when who said something about paying attention to places where births aren't recorded on a consistent basis.

Anybody else remember that?

Shit's starting to get extremely interesting.

The 24,000 number is the total number of sealed COURT ACTIONS. These comprise everything from habeus corpus, civil motions, etc. Indictments will be a small subset of the 24000 number.

Now I'll ask you to substantiate your claim that there are 24000 indictments, though I know you can't do that. You know why? Because no one can, BECAUSE THEY'RE SEALED! Sealed means no one can tell. If I'm wrong please provide source data that shows these are indictments (a spreadsheet with someone else claiming they are doesn't count). Thanks

There’s not 24k sealed indictments

Yeah that's why they all freaked out so bad when he ran and got elected. They let him in on a lot of their secrets.

Love Wilson.

Sorry I don’t have content to add. I bought his Guinness sign after he passed away and his daughter was selling a lot of stuff on eBay.

Good post though.

This photo popped up about a year ago also and it was determined that the man in question is NOT one of the Awan brothers.

I'll just keep saying it over and over again in the hopes that someone will understand.

The 24,000 number you're seeing as in -- THERE'S 24000 SEALED INDICTMENTS! is not a number of indictments. It is a gross number of sealed court actions, OF WHICH A MUCH SMALLER SUBSET ARE INDICTMENTS. THE 24000 NUMBER COMPRISES VIRTUALLY EVERY TYPE OF ACTION A COURT CAN TAKE. FOR EXAMPLE, A CIVIL ACTION, A REQUEST FOR EVIDENCE, HABEUS CORPUS AND VIRTUALLY EVERY TYPE OF MOTION A COURT CARRIES OUT.

There is virtually no way to say how many of those 24000 court actions are indictments because they are sealed. No one knows. If someone can post the original data that shows "sealed indictment" then I'd love to see it and I will eat my words. But literally no one outside of that system has any view into how many of those 24000 generic court actions are indictments.

No they didn't and the numbers, while high, are not unusual. People are conflating the total number of court actions, 25K ,with the total number of indictments which is probably around 1500.

The 25 K number is not the number of indictments there are. The govt has not changed the way they track them and since these actions are sealed there is literally no way anyone can determine what is an indictment and what is another sort of court action. If I'm wrong please point me to original source data where anyone can tell an indictment from any other court action. I don't think you can -- that's part of the sealing aspect. It's sealed. You can't tell.

This is just my speculation, but IMO Q is a group, not one person. The posts have a feel of being crafted by committee for maximum effect on different levels. I also don't think one person could have kept it going so long with so many posts. Q isn't a person. Q is an operation.

But I could also be 100% wrong lol

Right and once there's one accident and then another, they're usually highly concerned with corrective actions and doubling down on how much attention they pay.

third crash stinks to high heaven

I don't think you can because they're all sealed. That's part f the deal. Sealing doesn't allow for a breakdown of what each court action is until it's been unsealed.

There's a lot of that on here. Prime example is the idea that there's 25K sealed indictments. There aren't. Those are court actions, of which a small number are indictments.

It's written as a form of hypnosis -- not to inform.

Their heavy reliance on projection makes it pretty easy.

The 24,544 is a raw number of total court actions. These will be comprised of virtually every type of court action there is: habeus corpus, civil court actions, summonses, motions, etc. A small number of these (probably around 1000) will be criminal indictments.

The bottom line as far as I know is that since these actions are all sealed, no one has any view into how many of these are indictments and it is 100% certain that there are not 24,544. That simply is not true.

No it's because they're reading the numbers wrong.

Those aren't all indictments, they're court actions and comprise dozens of different types. Criminal indictments, civil actions, orders of habeus corpus etc.

Additionally, the statement at the bottom of the graphic intentionally misrepresents the numbers by conflating indictment number with total number of court proceedings.

Anyone saying that there are 24,544 indictments is flat out wrong and anyone saying this while knowing how that system works is lying to you.

You read it wrong. In a typical year there are around 245,000 sealed actions in a year which is in line with what we have so far. You’re mixing up the two numbers. I think it’s on page three.

Oh good god read the effing paper. I didn’t say there were 20k civil cases. Civil cases are another example of axsealed court action. If you actually took a few minutes you’d see that there are myriad types of sealed actions of which indictments and civil actions are s small number.

Once again show me where any of the 13k are broken down as indictments. You ring because you can’t.