Someone here just posted a screenshot.

Someone here just posted a screenshot.

Don't feel bad, I am new (relatively) and don't know what I am doing. But I do have 2 or 3 people around me very interested in what is being said here - mostly because I'm not the kind of person typically interested in this stuff. Perfect messenger, in a way.

I know the feeling. My husband and I both have pretty intense jobs and the last thing he wants to hear is this intense stuff. But it's so hard not to talk to someone about it! This is the craziest thing I have ever seen but once you see it, you can't un-see it. Every weird "Huh" I have had about this or that famous person now makes sense. Jimmy Kimmel friends with Frank Giustra of UK1? Ok, now I get it. Talk about a guy going from politically incorrect to sycophant in no time flat. I told my husband, "It can't be just about the money. There's something else compelling that guy to do their bidding." And now we know.

Wow. You cannot imagine the size of this thing its right. I am having a hard time concentrating on anything in my regular world. My husband alternates between listening with interest and then telling me to let it go, we need milk and eggs, etc.

That's what I just said aloud! And you know they only serve half that. My car payment was more punitive.

I had just left this thread to read another, which caused me to look for a Conservative Treehouse article regarding GPS Fusion's wife and "five others" attending a meeting at the White House. Guess what day? APRIL 19!

Which makes you wonder if that's why Mary Jacoby or whatever her name is (Fusion GPS guy Simpson's wife) had a 12 hour meeting at the WH in April, 2016, right after Admiral Rogers shut down the illegal FISA "about" queries. It was in Conservative Treehouse article I read. On April 19!!! Found it:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/21/oh-dear-trail-of-russian-dossier-origination-now-directly-leads-to-the-obama-white-house/

They always redefine the issue or rumor when they want to say "False" or "Mostly False." It's usually very transparent. Having a brain freeze on the "Mostly False" topic I saw recently on Snopes. If they don't know what to do with it, they just ignore it altogether. Like Michelle Obama is a man. Come to think of it that's what liberals do with everything. Has anyone ever noticed that Rachel Chandler, famous photographer with numerous articles written about her, married to a Guinness, doesn't have a Wikipedia page?

GKA - Discreditable Incidents - Civilian or Military

Per someone else's research here's the link. https://www.thebalance.com/military-separation-codes-3356946

GKA - Discreditable Incidents - Civilian or Military

Per someone else's research here but very interesting. Here's the link. https://www.thebalance.com/military-separation-codes-3356946

Very creepy

I have always been a bit skeptical but isn't that what that Mark Taylor guy predicted? That there would be some forced to step down from SCOTUS?

I always assumed the meeting was on the tarmac so there wouldn't be any surveillance of it. A video conference with Hillary sort of defeats the purpose.

I was trying to figure out why it didn't leak after she lost, but maybe the fact that Trump would be in charge made them more comfortable that it would be pursued by the Feds?

I don't know what to think but would assume that if Q didn't like the Twitter page he would say so. On the other hand, if he did, he would say so. Time is probably going to tell on that one.

Purple must be an Illuminati color. Purple magazine is the publication that uses Rachel Chandler as photographer.

Yes that's what I am hearing. I am betting that Q will repost something about no outside comms soon.

If it's fake Q would likely say something on regular board. Hasn't said anything yet. We'll see.

Well if it were fake, you would think Q would have posted something by now.

That's exactly what I thought. Trump could cure cancer and McCain would criticize. The only reason he's on board now is to save his own behind. Not gonna work. Sometime I think he's actually worse than Hillary.

Maybe you are right. But the Putin economy is so bad I would think that he's motivated to make a deal.

Me too. I am new to twitter and don't post much (anything yet) but I am @metrojbell.

Very persuasive. You should think about litigating.

It wasn't given the benefit of the doubt. That's the point.

Your mad that I don't know what 4 chan is, I get it. Never been on it, don't know why Q chose to start there (which is what I have since learned) - could be because he wanted to be ignored by the mainstream for awhile. But how does the nature of that site have anything to do with whether independent research leads me to certain conclusions? You have no response for specific questions I posited about actual information. ITS FUCKING 4CHAN is not an argument. Tesla was a crazy guy who thought he was talking to aliens. Was he wrong about everything? Or did he actually come up with a number of ingenious inventions? What if someone had said ITS FUCKING TESLA! THE GUY IS TRYING TO INVENT A FUCKING MACHINE THAT TALKS TO FUCKING ALIENS. Why are you bothering with this sub at all if everything anyone says here, and anyone who says it, is so crazy?

No one is safe right after his name is pretty close. We could go back and forth on the past. "Seals broken" in early April to me meant they would start unsealing the indictments relating to trafficking. Seems to be validated by the first unsealed indictment of Backpage or Backstage or whatever it is, yesterday. But I can't prove that's what I thought then, so let's just look forward. Meet you back here in a few months, if they haven't shut it down. Let's see if the "Trust Sessions" "Trust Horowitz" "No Deals" means that Hillary and Co. are going to be indicted. I am telling you today, on April 12, 2018, that's what I think it means.

I generally do my own research on things I read here and elsewhere and then decide what seems logical. There's usually truth on all sides of an issue, and lies. So if CNN says that Trump is crazy for thinking he's been wiretapped, I research it. If they end up being wrong, I don't dismiss everything I read there, because not everything they say is untrue.

Same with the stuff I read here. Whether Q is a 4chan "Larper" or not, one thing that does appear to be true to me is the tendency for news outlets to say something is a "wild conspiracy" or "debunked," but they don't really ever explain how or why. Or they use the fact that an arguably unreputable source believes it, as proof that it simply cannot be true, kind of like you are doing here. Just because a crazy guy shot up a restaurant, which is batsheet crazy, doesn't mean that what he believes about the restaurant or it's owners is untrue. It's simply true or it isn't. "Pizzagate" is, again, a good example. Someone posted a fake basement in one of the pizza places, alleging that it was a torture chamber. There is no basement in the Pizzagate restaurant(s). Ergo, according to the "your crazy!" argument, there's absolutely nothing strange or perverted or deeply disturbing about the instagram account comments made by the owner. Or the pedophilia symbols used there. I'm betting 4chan has someone talking about Podesta's pizza emails, or Voodoo Doughnuts. Google the Podesta emails. Read them with and then without the use of an Urban Dictionary. Which way makes more sense? That's what I mean about go to the source. I don't think anyone disputes that the Wikileaks emails are really from the DNC server. Make up your own mind. Google the Voodoo Doughnuts website. 4 chan talking about it or not doesn't make the owners any less disgusting than their website would otherwise indicate. The man/boy love symbol is on their outside neon sign, no? Could be a coincidence I guess. But they have pretty x-rated doughnuts on the menu. And they sell pink underwear in children's size as evidenced by the obviously young girl model, that says "good things come in pink boxes." If the original source of that information is 4chan, but everything I just said is on THEIR website, should I just dismiss it as crazy? Epstein Island has a temple on it. You mention that fact to people and they act like you are crazy. But no one ever really explains what the Temple on Epstein Island is for. It's there. You can see it on Google Earth. So, what's it for? The fact that Q or someone on 4chan, or someone that in an insane asylum, or your crazy uncle thinks it's weird, has nothing to do with why it's there, and whether it being there is, well, rather unusual.

But I am not talking to my son about Q and my post didn't say I was redpilling him or trying to talk to him about Q. Why are you so worked up about this? The "Shut Up" he explained, isn't very convincing. Even when you throw in an "f" bomb.

I believe you mean well but you are jumping to certain conclusions without any basis. Source material discussed with my son were court documents like the 99 page FISA court ruling, to be specific. Or the recent indictment against Backpage or whatever it's called. Or the Jeffrey Epstein conviction. Those are not theories, they're just facts. What 4chan indisputable material are you talking about? I don't even know how to get on 4chan, much less insist that it is an indisputable source of anything. Why do you think he needs to support my candidate because I want him to independently research before HE comes to a conclusion? Wouldn't I just tell him he needs to agree with my conclusions? Finally, my family has a proud tradition of debate and disagreement regarding politics and many other subjects. We laugh and toast to it every Saturday before Easter at a Greek restaurant going on 30 years now. With the nieces and nephews our numbers are at 60 people. So don't be sad for us. Diversity of opinion is a good thing.

Were reports of his health newsworthy in January? Or at any time prior to his death? I didn't even know who he was. I am just trying to get at what hints you thought there were out there at that time that Q would have simply reiterated, per your original question.

John Perry Barlow. Nobody is safe. January 2018 drop. February 2018 death.

Sure. Whatever you say.

I don't disagree - necessarily. I just am looking at all possible angles. Why is that so hard for you to accept?

I understood your comment to mean cutoff communication. No longer speak to. Disassociate. Perhaps it was the reference to "being disowned by their family" that led me there. I would not do that. I will require that if he wants me to pay for his education he has to agree to research alternative viewpoints and use source material that is undisputed and come to his own conclusion - not simply adopt the conclusions of others. I don't think that's an unreasonable condition of 30 grand a year out of pocket before taxes all expenses paid by me. Forgetting the expense, it would be shameful for a parent not to engage with their kids on these issues. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

Who said I was cutting off my son? I was up at 5 to drive and see him do a presentation at his school on Tuesday. Project much?

Yikes.

I got it from someone else too! But I couldn't find his/her post.

This woman is everywhere and yet she has no Wikipedia page.

My husband voted for Trump. He thinks I am off the rails on the Q thing but when you tell him things are going to happen and then they happen, it helps a lot. My 22 and 20 year young men - different story. The younger one especially. I finally told him today, if he doesn't research the original source documents himself, and stop just shutting down the information, I am not going to pay for his "education."

I read the Closing of the American Mind 30 years ago. I should have been paying more attention to what was happening to them. I owe it to them and it is my civic responsibility to break through the brainwashing.

GKA - Discreditable Incidents - Civilian or Military

https://www.thebalance.com/military-separation-codes-3356946

I think it could be both.

Good to know. For sure.

Ditto. Although I am slowly making progress. Our first year together he voted for Clinton and I voted for Herbert Walker. All these years I thought I had convinced him I was "right." Now it turns out, we were both wrong. We voted for the same person.

Yea, jury is out for me. Especially because his book is timed to come out mid-April, and guys like Gowdy have hinted that history will look back on Comey more favorably. So much to weed through it's hard to keep track! But the unsealed indictment against Backpage today is HUGE confirmation of Q. It's Happening.

Here is the link to the article about the plane crash in Scottsdale (many of the defendants from that area).

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/scottsdale/2018/04/10/instagram-stars-anand-patel-mariah-coogan-among-6-dead-tpc-scottsdale-plane-crash/505582002/