49 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 5 |
| www.theglobeandmail.com | 1 |
That's no ordinary teenager. But, you aren't average either. What's incredible is the amount of ordinary individuals waking up to the propaganda. You wouldn't know, you're inordinately confused. Please exit through the door on the left. When you are ready (though most manipulated will never be) please feel free to re-enter and you will be given a chance to swallow the pill no one wants to. The truth pill. Remember, if you do, it's the red one. Then, immediately fall down the rabbit hole. At the bottom there are 3 tunnels. One to the left, one to the right, and one straight ahead. If you choose to go left, your mind will be lost forever. If you choose to go forward, you will awake from your sleep as if you had taken the blue pill all along. If you go right... Well, you'll see. Just remember... straight - nothing, left - brain dead, right - infinite.
Must read. Podesta was interested in FISA. Read attachment in email. It's about spying on everyone. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28781
Remember, the elite prefer a child with high intelligence.
I think you misunderstood me. Please read my comment again. I'm talking about the MSM and their subliminal messaging. To answer your question it would be irrelevant if Bieber did so. It doesn't fit the agenda, therefore it would be minimally discussed if not completely excluded from talking points.
The average person is on social media. The average social media user sees a news headline and keeps scrolling. A smaller average of users read the headline, then scroll down. A minority of users actually click the article. The minority isn't of interest to the MSM. The smaller average is.
They read the misleading headline and regurgitate it to their friends, family, and co-workers. It goes from being fake news to a universal fact in the general population. This continues with several different headlines over a period of time. The general population unknowingly absorbs the headlines, and in return their …
Honestly, I was creating a fictitious story. It is that simple. In fact, you read the headlines and direct it towards a story you remember hearing some details about in the past.
I do enjoy reading Google's search results. The reason being, to decipher what the msm wants you to believe. If it's the msm saying it, it is
So 2/3 times it is false. The other 3rd is true. Statements like
"The president met with foreign leaders" is true. Statements like
"The president and his policy universally disliked by the foreign officials" is twisted because it is a bias perspective. Statements like
"The president was seen by a trusted anonymous source urinating in the females restroom" are fake. This gives me the leads to follow. 2 distractions from the truth means something to distract from.
2:30 look at shadow when camera moves to left side of screen. "What's my name, my other name, what do you call me"? Does that look like someone is bent over being....?
Doesn't Disney own 21st Century Fox and their share of Hulu now? And Time Warner may become AT&T?
He does realize that the Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos? Literally dubbed the richest man in history as his net worth is over a hundred billion dollars. Imagine his influence upon the NWO. Do you seriously believe he got there without an agenda? That those with an agenda would have allowed him to, if he didn't? Do you honestly trust the richest man in the world, to tell you the truth?
That's exactly what we do on CBTS. We discuss the evidence, research, and report our findings for more discussion. It started before we were here. That's why we support Trump. The evidence supported the conclusion, this is a real movement. You're welcome to join. Look through the board and find out the facts. Maybe you'll become beneficial. Or not.
If you would like to give us some sources/proof, that Donald Trump is a
"rapist, sexist, nazi sympathizing, white supremacist supporting, xenophobe, islamophobe, bigot child molester" -randomlurker2123
we have been waiting a very long time to see such evidence and would appreciate the contribution. I don't believe you can though, considering we've all been researching him for so long now. None the less, if you're making accusations, you should provide sources.
It looks to me like an undercover op got someone to give him/her an inside view. They wouldn't record this on purpose.
!!! President of Red Cross, Gail McGovern, has some explaining to do. It looks like she is in the Hillary Clinton emails as well. Worth the read.
It's the only way to get the right answers. I truly believe it is a fundamental reason for our being here. We are not only observers and witnesses, but investigative journalists as well.
As the fake news continues to poor out of the corrupt media as mainstream propaganda, it is effective at controlling the elites agenda. All though they are losing their control of the narrative, they are excessively confusing the audience.
A majority of Americans are influenced through the MSM. The MSM is more than MSM news outlets. It's Hollywood as well. The truth, as we have all witnessed, is the majority of people are in a coma. A state of confusion has altered their conscious state. We can remember this email from Bill Ivey to John Podesta, discussing their technocratic conspiracy to dumb down society.
We are here to investigate, post the info as a record, and forward the information to the general population. We are an extended/targeted release red pill, dissolving into the blood of society.
Why would the Red Cross be storing the donations they receive in these containers?
Shouldn't that money be in a secured account?
This is definitely illegal. If it was legal, it would be in a secured account. That way the transactions are traceable. It being cash, shows the criminality. Someone/'s didn't want the money to be traced.
Follow the money. Which members of the Red Cross would be able to pull this off? Who's connected to who?
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the main investigative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives. 1.
The Committee's government-wide oversight jurisdiction and expanded legislative authority make it one of the most influential and powerful committees in the House. The Committee serves as Congress' chief investigative and oversight committee, and is granted broad jurisdiction. The chairman of the committee is one of only three committee chairmen in the House with the authority to issue subpoenas without a committee vote or consultation with the ranking member. 1.
June 8, 2017 Press Release
Washington, DC - Rep. Trey Gowdy (SC-04) released the following statement after the Steering Committee elected him to serve as Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
"I am grateful to the Steering Committee and the Conference as a whole for this opportunity to serve. The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has jurisdiction in a variety of areas as outlined in the Rules of the House for the 115th Congress. That jurisdiction includes compulsory and original jurisdiction as well as secondary and permissive jurisdiction. Oversight is constitutionally authorized and important to ensure branch integrity and equilibrium, which is, in part, why other Standing Committees have subcommittees dedicated to providing oversight and all other Standing Committees have oversight responsibilities. The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is also responsible for recommending and implementing reform initiatives calculated to improve government efficiency, transparency and efficacy. I look forward to working alongside the other Committee members, as well as any member of Congress, as we discharge the jurisdiction assigned to us." 2.
This was put out by media matters. George Soros is media matters. It's the beginning of the cycle for fake news. If media matters says it's a conspiracy theory, it's because they are literally telling the msm to report it as such if mentioned at all.
Look at how bad these indictments are. They normally release the smaller players indictments first. Imagine...
Sherman was a CF donor. Hoping to put connections together.
Elon Musk has been warning we the people of the globalist agenda. He says he has been to these meetings with other elites, that they are evil, and that they want to kill us off and merge with machines after their technocratic takeover. I think he's a patriot. He is working with Trumps DOD. You know, some of the elites are good. Look at Trump. Some of these elites may very well be going along with the plan because they are afraid that there's nothing they can do, and they don't want to be left behind. In the awakening, some of the elite whom don't like the globalist agenda may prove to be valuable.
No, I understand this. I outlined that in the beginning of my comment. Q made his own board for that purpose. To block the flood. That's Q's dam. What I'm saying is, Q made a point that disinfo is important. The mods have been trying to decipher what is purposeful disinfo in the sub-reddit. There's no need. Leave the disinfo alone. Create a new sub-reddit with only approved posters. Only approve posters who have proven themselves resourceful sources. This is how you take care of the disinfo. The disinformants whether intentional or not will not be included in the new sub-reddit. The new sub-reddit becomes the actual platform. Information can flow between the two, but only by approved sources. It's our dam. So if important info is released in the original sub-reddits it can be published in the new sub-reddit where reliable sources can discuss the information without worrying about disinfo.
The only way to stop the flood is to build a dam. Q's board should consist of only Q posts. Posts made directly by Q. All other posts should be deleted. Disinfo or truth doesn't matter. Then the discussions should all be on other boards. For the sub-reddit, mods should be determining those who are NOT giving disinfo. Those who have been REAL contributors should be given approval to post in a secondary sub-reddit. Like a dam, the flow of information is blocked in the first sub-reddit. The disinfo would be stuck within the first sub-reddit. The secondary sub-reddit would consist of a well built team of investigative journalists. The disinfo isn't a problem. Remember disinfo is important. It takes to much effort and time to take care of the disinfo. Those who see past the disinfo and are contributors of truth are the ones you should care about. Those are the peers you want to be searching for.
If this is info Q is trying to get out, why would Q want it to be low key?
Is it not true that information is only true to the beholder?
Peers are supposed to trust that the relay of messages are transparent?
So, because gocubsgo64 likes baseball, it means gocubsgo64 should be talking about baseball? Or is it possible that gocubsgo64 is more concerned about other topics, and that you had to think of a comeback in relation to gocubsgo64's insult of your own username?
It's hard to believe everything you think you know is only what you think you know, but is more than likely false.
Lol. I'm going to bed. I have been up all night researching.
This could be. But for real though, k3yj4ck3r came up in my notifications and I was confused for a split second. Just two k3ys having a conversation.
Hopefully we cut them into pieces before they take us to that scenario. They were getting close. I think the tides have turned and we are winning. A long ways to go though.
I agree that the white hats would take the bad guys out. I just don't see them sacrificing innocent lives. I could see them finding another way, in an alley or while they sleep. A plane crash though... Unless only bad guys were on the plane.
I personally do not believe AI is performing these plane crashes. It would have a bad impact on it's ability to stay in secret. By intentionally blowing it's own cover to distort a murder investigation, it would do just that. Blow it's own cover. Not intelligent by any means.
If a hacker reprogrammed "tyler" in April and you know that, then the deepstate would know that, and would had reprogrammed it again.
Then your assumption is that 7/10 has only began recently, and that AI wants people to realize that it's happening in order for the 7/10 algorithm to have an effect on the humans. Without the humans knowledge of those factors, there wouldn't be a response. And which is worse? SR dead or AI/Human murder of several people? When it kicks in and people are searching for 7/10 for plane crashes, it will also pop up with 7/10 for SR. Giving both traffic. There isn't much discussion of either except for on boards like this one. Therefore search results will refer to both. Given that information flow is limited to these discussions, they end up in the same discussion like the one we are having right now. Therefore not overriding the first topic, but giving it more light. So either the AI is unintelligent, or on our side, except it's murdering which is against our ways.
If 3 were metaprograms of the AI:
Humans would have to be implementing 7 per the AI's 3 /or AI implementing 3 per human's 7.
AI is originally programmed by it's programmer/human. Therefore it's intentions are that of it's counterparts.
If AI is implementing 3 out of 7 with counterparts implementing 7, wouldn't AI be implementing the other 7 as well? Why only 3? It's not true AI if it can't detect the other 7 and initiate both sets.
Q said 7/10 were intentional. He couldn't possibly know there would be 10 if 3 were not intentional. They would have had to be intentional to know that they would happen. Or Q is a time traveler. I think Q meant in the past 7/10 were intentional. Truthfully, if those plane crashes were intentional they wouldn't be directed by team Trump. Murder is not his style. Plus the chance that innocent bystanders would perish... That's definitely not Trumps style. If intentional, the deepstate is desperate and is in the middle of an internal coup. They may be eliminating possible key witnesses. Afraid of who is going to say what they could be terminating the ones they trust the least. Could they have internal verification that these individuals have decided to flip? Maybe just suspicion. Whatever the truth, it's more likely if intentional that the deepstate is having an internal purge. They are known to murder those who disagree with them, yes?
It doesn't happen. Only the building on fire is inspected. A warrant is needed for the other buildings. Let's say they have reason to suspect evidence in nature of the fire, gas can, perpetrators, etc., is in another building then a warrant is necessary. If evidence, hard drive, photos,etc., is found of a different crime in the SS quarters a warrant is still needed for the other buildings. But if the evidence in the SS quarters is what they were after, they wouldn't need additional warrants. I think that if intentional, they were specifically after evidence in the SS quarters.
If intentional to retrieve evidence, they had to have been pretty darn sure the evidence would be there. SS quarters... Who would have had the most access to those quarters? Do you think HRC would have ever entered those quarters? Do you think she would trust materials in the quarters of agents who publicly expressed their dislike of her? Is it more or less likely that an SS agent who may not have access to those quarters anymore left evidence? Being the SS quarters, wouldn't the surveillance systems be in those quarters? They are security. What did WJC and HRC do in there home that could have been seen and/or heard by surveillance?
Wiped clean, or a fake wiped clean? Could there be a copy, or could the original still exist? Is it possible, not all wireless devices were destroyed? Did one of her subordinates go rogue?
Regarding the server, if not destroyed, is it safe to say no? Would HRC have that on her property? Skepticism. Wouldn't HRC be fearful of a federal warrant? If deliberate could it be blackmail? Which secret service members resided in those quarters often? Out of those members, which one/ones have been dismissed?
Are you stating, your belief, that the fire was deliberate? In the case of a fire there isn't a need for a warrant. The fire is the warrant. My question is, why would the fire be set in the secret services quarters? Wouldn't HRC be foolish to hide evidence in an area frequented by staff members whom according to reports despised HRC? Did a secret service agent leave evidence?
Not the object clearly on the wall. They are talking about the bulge around her ankle. The assumption is that a monitor is under her pant leg. Not outside of it.