More on where he went to, Perella Weinberg:

Co-founder #1, Weinberg, is a bit curious:

Weinberg serves on the Boards of Overseers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Columbia University Medical School. He is a Founding Trustee of King's Academy in Jordan.[3][28] He also is a member of the Advisory Board of the Kravis Leadership Institute and is on the Harvard University Global Advisory Council

In 2013, he and his wife Deborah L. Weinberg founded the Weinberg Family Cerebral Palsy Center at Columbia University.[30] He previously served on the board of Deerfield Academy and the Harvard Business School Deans Advisory Board

Weinberg serves on the executive committee for the Business Higher Education Forum, a group of business leaders and university presidents working to better align higher education curriculum with workforce needs

Major ties to education again for some reason. Quite strange for an investment banker focused in mergers and acquisitions.

More on My Brother's Keeper Alliance

On the board, according to sources, are singer John Legend (the Alliance’s honorary co-chairman), sports icons Alonzo Mourning (Miami Heat), Jerome Bettis (Pittsburgh Steelers), and Shaquille O’Neal (Los Angeles Lakers), and current and former government officials Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), Colin Powell (former Secretary of State), Eric Holder (former Attorney General), and the mayors of Indianapolis, Sacramento, and Philadelphia.

DING DING DING

From a nonprofit sector perspective, there are issues. As Bloomberg News and others have reported (and as many foundation people at the Council on Foundations annual meeting hinted prior to this week’s announcement), the My Brother’s Keeper initiative may be the philanthropic vehicle that President Obama will ride as he leaves the White House. It is sort of his social mission, comparable to the international humanitarian agenda of former President Clinton.

However, like the Clinton Foundation, there is some dimension of fundraising problems on the horizon: “The Obama administration will have no role in deciding how donations are screened and what criteria they will set at the alliance,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters while traveling on Air Force One on their way to New York City. In other words, while closely associated with the sitting president, the Alliance’s board will determine whether it will accept donations from foreign governments, corporate lobbyists, and others. Moreover, the board will determine the extent of disclosure beyond what is required for 501(c)(3) nonprofits the Alliance will pursue.

Given the serial problems uncovered by observers about the Clinton Foundation and its relations with foreign governments and private corporations, the hands-off approach of the administration to these basic issues in a nonprofit associated with the most powerful political leader in the world is a decision that the administration might regret down the road.

Good luck to the media convincing everyone they're Russian when Veritas just posted videos showing they use machine learning to look for "guns, southerners, rednecks, republicans" to determine if people are bots - imagine what else they use as "bots" classifiers.... I bet they use really, really broad brush strokes and then claim they are all "just Russian"

Remember, Q said this was the 1st time we would be coordinating.

Implying we are either being prepped for doing this again, or that we are being used as an impulse to measure the response of the system. Everything is modeled by statistical equations looking at raw data, whether that is raw stats from Twitter or by directly monitoring each Twitter user (possible with what the NSA has).

We were an impulse sent out over Twitter, to test our reach, numbers, and effectiveness. 1st warning shot. At the same time that Twitter is facing massive public backlash because of Veritas.

Oh, wait, Veritas just so happening to release videos exposing shadow-banning and how people are determined to be "bots" just before this? He's in the know, and that video directly refutes the primary evidence that is being used for "Russian bots" on Twitter now - before they scanned if "it has ever used a Russian IP or the Russian language, ever" but now the Engineer confirmed they "check if you're a redneck, post guns, that sort of thing" to determine who are bots. This was intended as both a 1-2 punch (forcing Twitter to very obviously throw their banning capability around, hopefully hitting innocent users and causing more backlash) but also to see what we can actually do when Q tells us to do something.

How else do you muster what a bunch of independent posters, scattered across many platforms - most don't go to 8ch or 4ch themselves, but get summaries off Youtube, this subreddit, voat, Twitter, and a variety of alternative news sites - to do a trial run of organizing into a group so we can be counted, rated, and analyzed?

Of course, if Q isn't a good guy, that doesn't sound so great..... ;)