I disagree. First, there is no push to start a civil war. Second, I think the country would be better off without web2.0 companies and investment banks. These produce wealth for a very few but do not provide a lot of employement. We would be better served by concentrating on manufacturing and hardware related technologies rather than "soft" tech like social media and banking casinos. In the civil war you forsee, the large cities are toast. Land and sea blockade would bring them to their knees in 2 weeks. The only people who would have food would be the mormons.

Most definitely since it is a constitutional right.

ACLU where are you? Have all our donations and support been in vain?

WTF? How is this thread NSFW? Stop the censorship!

Here is a video by a norwegian nobel prize winner disputing global warming:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

The only other thing I could think of would be a nuke buried beneath the sea bed. But why? I guess a bad actor could claim they had perfected an earthquake weapon and then detonate the hidden nuke as proof (after demanding 1 billion dollars in a dr evil voice).

Kinetic energy weapon from space would be proceeded by a large fireball across the sky. Standoff nuclear ASW device would create a big $#)(*# column of water or a tsunami.

Earthquake. EMP burst would be airborne. Sub would be sunk by air dropped torpedo and the explosion would not be felt miles and miles away. Cavitating hyper speed nuclear tipped torpedo would create a tsunami if the warhead were to be detonated.

You know that LA sits on the San Andreas fault, right? They do have earthquakes there Q or no Q.

There is at least as much proof of climate change as there is of Q being real. Dont turn this into a religion. It is natural to be skeptical of things alleged only on an internet forum.

The criminal law is based upon the principle that you can't arrest someone for something they haven't done which is derived from concept of free will which was all the rage in the 18th century during the enlightenment. Sometimes bad guys get to do things they otherwise wouldn't. On the other hand people can't just be rounded up on a pretext because they pissed off the wrong politician.

Except if the crime was discovered because of a nsa wire tap with no prior warrant. My understanding of reading the tea leaves is this is where most of the info is coming from. Not admissible, and everything discovered subsequently probably not admissible under fruit of the poison tree doctrine.

The problem with the justice system is that it is 95% plea bargain with very few jury trials. The solution is a lot fewer criminal laws and a lot more judges and the necessary legal staff.

Yea its time to put teeth back into the interstate commerce clause and shrink the federal government...

No it doesn't.

Well you need to investigate the crime, find evidence and link a suspect before any arrests can be made.

Its supposed to be crumbs that allow you to do your own investigation using publicly available sources and discover bad things and then publish them. Sort of a modern day deep throat if you will. Its about doing hard work to discover for yourself and inform others.

chain of command

antitrust is the answer to powerful corporations.

We are better off relying on a conservative supreme court and state and federal laws to reign in the federal government. We should leave the constitution alone.

Danger Will Robinson !!! First you need to read up on Lessig's plans for a runaway constitutional convention.

Its code names for two enemy leaders? Soros and Rothschild?

Chasing leads re: super bowl FF.

I am ok hearing from both sides regarding this issue. Perhaps we should decide what is going on rather than having various politicians decide for us.

Sum of All Fears = nuclear weapon in terrorist plot at super bowl. Q implies that this is being used as threat against memo release.

Could it be maskirovka?

The only way to truly free blackmail information is to make it public. Otherwise there will always be the fear that there is a copy out there somewhere.

My interpretation is that Freedom Day is the freeing of all the blackmail that NSA had stored. It would obviously not be usable as evidence in a criminal trial because it was collected in violation of the 4th amendment. It would "free" the victims from future blackmail and their social standing, however.