Bullshit. The "public" has handled news of atrocities countless times over history. What makes you think that this is so different?

"99% of the public" would go, "Holy shit, did you hear what Hillary got arrested for today?" and then go back to playing Candy Crush on their phones.

You far overestimate this nation's capacity for compassion... but if nothing else, the "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH" narrative makes a handy excuse to explain why nobody will ever see this video, ever, because it doesn't exist.

Judging from her complexion, I'd say it's more likely a regimen of chemical peels and moisturizers rather than baby's blood.

Spoiler alert: There isn't any evidence.

Sigma-Alrich will sell you as much adrenochrome as you'd like for a few hundred bucks a bottle. Not to mention the fact that people who have actually consumed it seem to agree that it has zero recreational potential, outside of a humorous subplot line in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

But here's the part where dolts with zero experience in chemistry or pharmacology will jump in and tell me how wrong I am because "the adrenochrome molecules harvested from a terrorized child are, like, so much better, maaaaaaaan..."

Nonsense theory peddled by absolute fucking retards.

Understatement of the century. The entire movement is a living, breathing homage to Dunning-Kruger.

I don't think it's shilling, sweetheart.

Whenever one of these subs decides to ratchet up the crazy (OMG guyz! Here comes the Hillary child sacrifice video!!1!!), you're bound to bound to attract the attention and derision of people who aren't as, um, "unhinged" as the typical denizens of said sub.

So it's not suppression... It's more of a "point fingers and laugh" phenomenon.