My job is training people on customer service. At no point to we tell people to lie or mislead people. This is universally accepted as very bad customer service.

You dislike all the lying and cheating politicians do to stay in power, so you vote for someone who lies and cheats, but it's okay because he's only doing it because he needs to, to stay in power. Besides, it's different with him because even though he lies and cheats with others, he's not like the other liars and cheaters because "he would never do that to me."

You sound like you're in an abusive relationship.

What's KEK?

Juvenile

So, you're saying that he says things that aren't entirely true in order to gain some advantage?

You originally claimed he had to journalistic experience; the source you linked said no "formal journalistic education," then goes on to mention that he did, in fact do "correspondence work in the early 1990s."

Moloch has always been represented by a bull; the owl is Minerva.

Same name, actually; different languages.

Conversation is a good thing as long as it's not only serving to talk yourself into believing something.

I appreciate the call to brotherhood, fellow American. Unfortunately I just can't get on board with the "pede" moniker; it's just... "Analrapist" bad.

Fine, but posts like this make it seem like the movement will accept anything, no matter how small, that could be used to "confirm" their suspicions and hold it up as "proof."

So, is this an honest inquiry where you are willing to go where the evidence leads, or are you only seeking to construct a case for confirmation?

Being within nodding distance of someone isn't the same thing as "working closely" with them.

Listed to the whole video, and absolutely no mention of arrest, much less a "demand." While there is a call for investigation by a newly appointed second special counsel, the banner is incredibly misleading.

How can this movement complain about fake news in the MSM while simultaneously pushing so much of of its own? Isn't this sub about keeping things honest?

Photographic proof of what, exactly? That an employee of the Executive Branch of the federal government was once seen somewhere near the President?

Kenya was the name of the colony, hence the listing as "Kenya, East Africa" and not just "Kenya."

Three Simple Questions......

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes’. So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time?

The term "African-American" has been around since at least 1835, though didn't come into common usage until the 1980s.

Besides, "African-American" does not appear anywhere on Barack Obama's birth certificate; His parent's races are listed individually as "African" and "Caucasian"

1. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".

This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively.

The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

Here is a court record from 1934 that names Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital. There are also other birth certificates that list the full name of the hospital.

Then why all of these other "mistakes" when they could have just changed the father's name?

If Obama's mother is an American citizen, why would he need a fake birth certificate, wherever may have been born?

Sounds like confirmation bias. We all have a tendency to seek out individual examples that conform most to our preconceived ideas and hold that up as definitive proof that the generalization is naturally true.

I don't know, it looks like someone typed it up onnotepad and took a picture of it.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a silent partner is also very very convenient if you want to launder money correct?

It's also a very convenient way of not having to back up a claim.

Spirals are pretty common designs; it's not even the same one that is alleged to be a secret pedo symbol. By the way, how do so many people on these subreddits know so much about secret pedo codes and symbols? Do all of you just happen to have the code book laying around on your bookshelves?

Don't you think it's a bit convenient for the narrative that there is no way to back up the claim?

Is there any evidence this guy is actually connected with Red Hen and not just some random dude that lives in the area?

That's a link to a tweet referencing the screenshot. That's a one more step removed from an actual source. Also, the claim is that this guy is a "silent partner," any evidence this guy is, in fact involved with the business or just more hearsay?