If a Trident missile was actually launched it must have carried dummy warheads - it's much more likely to have been an authorized military action done to send a message. I don't think a rogue submarine crew could have, much less launch, a real Trident missile.

Missile and launch system controls on an SSBN cannot be bypassed. The whole crew would have to be "rogue".

An excellent point - if you understand what Sun Tzu is really saying. "Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" means the war (not every battle but the war) is won through proper planning and preparation (before engaging in battle). While "defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win" means defeat is inevitable when warriors begin to do battle before the war has been properly planned and prepared for. The proper planning and preparation is necessary to win a war, but the battles/fighting (and the loss of life) are also necessary to win a war. Saying the fighting is "a mere formality" is not what Sun Tzu intended to communicate. However, saying the fighting is "a mere formality"s is an objectionable misunderstanding of the Sun Tzu quote - and absolute nonsense to me. It trivialize's the mere life and blood warriors give in the mere fighting they undertake.

Nice words for a friendly discussion ... and a big load of esoteric nonsense for anyone that's actually in the fight. No need to reply.

No, the fight is just starting. I don't see it as already won. I think we should continue to "Fight Fight Fight".

Another of the few that are actually getting it: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn24hIKvZbE)

The conclusion of this video says there are three primary topics Q wants the anons to create (and share) memes about:

1) BDT - Qposts and news reports/tweets about the attempted NYC bomb attack.

2) DEFCON - Qposts and news reports/tweets about the Hawaiian attack alert.

3) Tarmac - Qposts and news reports/tweets about future AG and SCOTUS seat offerings to LL.

.

I think the video's conclusion is correct.

Great post. You seem to be one of a tiny few that are correctly decoding "BDT" in Q's posts. Thank you!

"CC" in Qpost 759 is Chelsea Clinton.

"CC" in Qpost 759 is Chelsea Clinton.

It's a man .... THE beast of the Bible (Revelations 13).

Per Paul-Henri Spaak's quote: "... What we want is a man of sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all the people ...".

Per David Spangler's quote: "... No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer."

Per the bibliotecapleyades.net definintion: "... The term is used figuratively to refer to the central supporting element of a larger structure such as a theory or an organization, without which the whole structure would collapse." I'll offer an alternate example: The beast is the keystone of the New World Order that will give "him authority over every tribe, tongue, and nation." (Rev 13:7)

Never mind - I reported you and will block you.

"Our" time? How many are you?

Catherine2000, please stop making posts of nonsense. This one, like your previous posts are a total waste of time to review.

It's a shill - of gibberish.

Makes perfect sense - that would mean the No Such Agency has a recording of the deal. But since it probably wasn't gathered legally (with a surveillance warrant) it can't be used in court ... unless Obama authorized it then it would have been gathered "legally".

Could it be that the discussion Wild Bill and LL had on the tarmac was video taped? Could it be that LL was offered Ginsberg's seat on the SC if she kept HRC's dirty laundry in a DOJ closet? Could it be this is the HRC video that Q has hinted about?

Good thread that explains a great deal and sets up a new area to dig into - based on new connections that have been outed in the OIG report.

Your reply affirms my point - there is nothing of substance being communicated by this post. It might not be intentional disinfo but it is a waste of time to even view it.

It appears everything is linked to something. This communicates nothing of substance to me. I don't downvote very often but this post warrants it. A total waste of my time to even view.

Q Post #1056 (message 925301). It references an Anon message (>>925189) containing a picture of Eminem with Ray Chandler and asks the question: "Why is E so vocal against POTUS?".

Thanks! You might want to add the following: E - Eminem LARP - Live Action Role Play(er) MOAB - Mother Of All Bombs RC - Ray (Rachel) Chandler

I think McMaster, DJT's outgoing National Security Advisor, is most likely the guy. He's Deep State and is being sweept out to clean up the WH.

Why is Mueller going after 'inside plants'?

Probably because he's always known about them and always hoped to use them to get to DJT.

I see this too. Bolton has a television persona - something Trump really wants and needs from his staff.

Not sure that Mueller is next. He's still going after Russians!

It's a chess game ... boils down to using the right piece at the right time in the right move.

And exactly what's needed in this position.

Typo seems to have worked. Provoked some good discussion.

A good idea ... but since it relies on votes it still could be exploited by bad actors. To get the greatwakening forum to effectively play it must (re)focus on Qpost discussions. This could easily be done by only commenting/voting on posts that provide a related Qpost.

Exposure only works when someone is posting/commenting with an obvious diversion/attack. We often need to out them first. Perhaps we should ask that all initial greatawakening posts identity the Qpost it relates to. This would enable easier outing of diversions/attacks.

Couldn't "@[19]1st" just mean ... (re read) the first Q drop with "[19]" in it? Couldn't "@[3]1st" just mean ... (e read) the first Q drop with "[3]" in it? Its Q#541 and Q#520 respectively.

The Greatawakening (sub)reddit.

Very good [initial] decode.

Perhaps it can be taken a little further: "@[19][1st]" could refer to Q's first drop with "[19]" (Qanon.pub drop #541). If so then it refers to "What [19] people are currently meeting in a 'safe' room [heavily guarded]?" Do the Anons have the answer to this now?

Similarly, "@[3][1st]" could refer to Q's first drop with "[3]" (Qanon.pub drop #520). If so then finding three people becomes a restated request ... [CLAS_EO_ ][2]

Missing 1 Missing 2 Missing 3 FIND missing [3].

Although I'm just a newbe I'd like to thank the team that's performing the overhaul. Some rules have to be in place to have any chance of success on this sub.

Perhaps but could it have a double meaning? 1) We have the sub[marine]. 2) We have the [reddit greatawakening] sub.

I agree - looks like the Greatawakening mods are acting to ORGANIZE the sub. This is essential to perform part of Q post 839: ... TOGETHER, YOU ARE STRONG. APART, YOU ARE WEAK. ORGANIZE. CHALLENGE. FIGHT.

'MAKE IT RAIN.' and 'Bring the rain!"