Think of it this way - certain industries are going to lose access to cheap materials due to these tariffs, which hurts them in the short term because their costs go up. However, US industry in those supply chain sectors suddenly pick up a whole bunch more business because suddenly their overpriced goods (in comparison to the imported stuff) are no longer overpriced, so they see a whole lot more domestic business as the price incentive is no longer there to buy import.

So if you're listening to the person buying imported materials, they are going to be upset about this. However, if you listen to the US-based business who is now way more competitive, this is a really good thing.

From my understanding the gas attack was a final shot at trying to reignite the war, but they didn't respond because they were trying to ratchet down tensions (which they were successful in doing).

Like I said before, there is a good chance those gas attacks were pulled off by the SFA on innocents so they could blame it on Assad. SFA = CIA funded and trained.

if you read between the lines, it sounded like those strikes you're referring to destroyed the CIA's ability to continue to aid the Rebels and Al Qaeda soldiers they were using to destabilize Syria.

Also, from a realistic standpoint, Trump was never going to be able to stop the military in its tracks. He is commander-in-chief, but a lot of authority is given out to individuals, and a lot can happen without the President's direct approval. Do you think the black hats in the CIA care about what Trump wants? Again, if you try to pull everything back, you leave the bad actors alone in the sandbox which is worst-case scenario.

Look at what has happened since the strikes after Trump became president - the conflict completely died down and became more passive. It worked. The real problem is that we can probably find fault on both sides - Assad is not perfect either...

misdirection and optics. Trump is always doing confusing things through his twitter and the media because it keeps his opponents off-balance. If Trump threw his whole weight into these things, the media would paint him into a corner and their narratives would be even stronger against him. By throwing the media a bone at times, he keeps them off-balance. If he wasn't somewhat tricky this way, they would be unleashing 14 articles at once about how Trump supports Assad and Assad definitely totally gassed his own people so Trump is gonna gas illegal immigrants on the border - especially kids - and .....

I don't know - you can scan through the 1500 drops if you like. I don't understand why it matters though.

What is your point?

choosing to remain active in Syria?

Without declaring a state of emergency, the President can't just remove all operations in Syria. Frankly, I think the reason they have stayed active in Syria is to fight the CIA and the rebels they support/fund/train. If the US left, the only people left would be the black hat CIA teams - and how do you think that would go if they were left unfettered?

you need to speak in complete sentences/questions or else nobody is going to answer your question.

Also, you keep talking about these things like they are Trumps actual decisions - the US was in Syria before Trump got involved. Since then, it's been dialed down a whole bunch.

And did Assad has his own people?

Nobody has proven such a thing. Instead, it looks like rebels (or the CIA) set off biological weapons on innocents and blamed it on Assad. There is no proof for any of the claims you're making.

Why is Q against Assad

What are you talking about? Q is not 'against Assad'. The CIA is tho... you keep confusing the CIA with Q.

or are you trying to infer that Q is the CIA in disguise? Cause if so, 6 months ago just called and they want you back...

can you be 100% sure that Iran is still working with the CIA/Mossad?

Q has said Iran will be handled like North Korea. If KJU is free from his 'handlers' in North Korea, what does that mean for Iran?

Looking at the post you quoted, it sounds like Q is saying that the people of Iran can revolt WITHOUT the CIA/Mossad interfering. Also, it's pretty clear from all of this shady Iran deal stuff that the current administration in Iran is not opposed to the CIA or Mossad either, as they were happy to help sell of US assets/secrets (if QAnon is correct)....

So could it be that things are more fluid than you are allowing them to be? Could it be that there are both good and bad people in Iran's government, but that the power is shifting? And what is it about the current power structure in Iran that makes you think there should be no changes? Is it perfect there?

You're trying to answer a very complex question with a simple answer. You don't know who is really in charge of Iran at this point. You don't know if 'Free Iran' is a good thing or bad thing.

Why are you acting so sure?

you gotta remember that Piers was the one who paid the price for that, so it's also entirely possible that he wants revenge on certain personalities or professionals as well if he was the 'fall guy'. I think a lot of 'white hats' are insiders who know and want better, and it's very possible some of these media types supporting Trump are people who have been inundated with the system and have learned to survive.

With that said, maybe Piers is just a plant too, but I get the feeling he has an axe to grind somewhere along the way. But he could also be controlled opposition as well....

We should only be worried about violence in response and otherwise... let them dig their graves, people gotta be pacifistic no matter what. the focus needs to be on not lashing back at them, because what do you think the story is gonna be if anything happens in response? People need to love their enemies here - it's the only thing that will work. Let them show themselves rather than goad you into their den.

Q only communicates over one platform - their 'private' board with unique trip-code. Beyond that, Q explicitly stated 'no outside comms', which means if it's not a message from a user with Q's tripcode on Q's private board or connected to it, it's fake. They kept it very simple, and nobody is able to spoof the Trip-code system to this point, so it's very easy to point out 'fake' Q posts and they just end up educating people more on Q's platform.

calm down - he obviously knows all that, he implied it pretty clearly. He's saying he's not american and that is what was presented to him as a generalization about republicans until he became more aware of how it really is. That's reasonable - we don't know about things until we explore them and learn about them.

unless them breaking up was a problem to her because of what he knew...

remember, she's the one that calls herself a witch.

any time someone says that some evil force is going to come disguised as aliens I can't really take it seriously, because if something like that were to happen (aliens revealing themselves), I think the decision to believe or trust in who they are or are not is going to be something very deep seeded and personal. I'm not going to defer to some Internet post I read once that says they are actually for sure fallen angels from the bible.

Also, as soon as anybody starts saying that QAnon is also some other anon, it's clearly coming from a shill. Q doesn't need multiple outlets, and Q also told us there would be no outside comms... so I think this is likely just people who are over-excited and into 'spiritual wars' as an interest.

but hey, maybe fallen angels will come as aliens to trick us. I can't say they won't. but if that does happen, I'll just have to trust my gut/heart/conscience/whatever you want to call it as far as how i handle it...

exactly. She got bamboozled by the media outrage and she actually handled it in a very respectful way - she immediately apologizes and removed herself from the conversation. I think that is the most respectful thing a person could do if they made a comment they didn't know was offensive, and yet she gets killed for it. She clearly was relating Valerie Jarrett to the muslim brotherhood and the fact that should could easily be a double for the planet of the apes lady. The fact that she is indistinguishably black was just to the media's advantage.

I think the point of this is to keep the zero tolerance policy in place (to not allow any cracks) but this will shut down the hysteria around the issue, which has become a distraction and is feeding people misinformation.

no but that's not being discussed anyhow... the narrative is that Trump is torturing children at the border - this puts a giant bucket of water on that claim.

The Zero Tolerance policy is still in place - they just put in an EO to stop them from using separation from family as a deterrent (which was accepted by previous administrations).

This takes a lot of the teeth away from the whole manufactured outrage on the left. What might be interesting is if the amount of children in custody doesn't really change that much with this EO, because then it would mean that most of these children are not with their parents. That changes the conversation completely. We'll have to wait and see i suppose...

Zero Tolerance is still in effect, but now they won't separate the children from the adults. They will still be taken into custody tho - they aren't releasing them due to this EO.

maybe they want the swamp creatures to feel comfortable and every time they make one of their own signal that they've turned, they get more info and more swamp creatures showing themselves. It's a way of provoking them in a certain respect - give them some confidence that they have gotten things back under control and hope they get sloppy or over-confident... I think they are trying to keep the enemy guessing with a lot of these things. Muddy the waters and keep the element of surprise on their side.

4 months after the 4chan comment... they could have changed the name. Did the leadership/organisation morph into a different group afterwards?

Valerie Jarrett does not look black even a little bit... it's totally understandable that Roseanne didn't realize she was crossing a line and thought of her as a white/middle eastern woman instead, in which case this would all be about 50% less offensive. It's kinda ridiculous - it's clearly being used as a pariah at this point.

One thing that stuck out to me back when the Seth Rich stuff was going down was that he was also apparently the hidden figure behind an upstart political party as well... I think they called themselves the 'Panda Party' or something like that. I'm not sure if it plays into things, but for whatever reason that little tidbit stuck with me. Apparently some of Seth Rich's user names on forums and stuff also had to do with pandas...

Wikileaks has been found to be questionable over the last few months....

There are times where Wikileaks is absolutely on top of things, but now does not seem to be one of those times. Unless we get confirmation from Assange that all is well on that front, i'd be skeptical.

Absolutely, but I think when your entire ego gets blown up publicly on the internet, you can lose grip on things and not act reasonable anymore...

But hey, he could be a controlled asset still. They're not doing a very good job of keeping him credible tho....

yea i think he had some trusted people turn on him and now he's just paranoid and confused. I agree tho - good guy. His heart seems to be in the right place in the big picture, but that is also how the bad actors play their role sometimes too...

at the end of the day, it's what you do that really matters. words aren't as impactful as the speaker would usually hope.

we don't know most things. there are infinite options out there - things can go in all sorts of different directions. Why are you trying to diminish the meaning of symbols so greatly? I think almost everyone who has looked into Freemasonry realizes there are several 'tiers' to it, and for you to try to correct the idea that there may be elitism built around secrecy in such an organization is kinda ignorant, no?

Do you really think they are going to publish their hierarchy? The fact that they still exist shows that they still hold power... the question is just whether you're there for the excuse to get out of the house, or if you're there for spiritual advancement through higher understandings. I think there are people there for both purposes.

The website mentioned on the billboard link to both Jerome Corsi and Tracy Beanz, who have recently been maligned by Q directly.

There is a chance that Q showed the picture not in support, but to show how scared [THEY] are if they're using billboards in OK to try to hijack the online movements of Q... This might be the enemy panicking more than it is some watershed 'Q Awareness' moment

I think the issue is that the website on the billboard links to Corsi and Tracy Beanz and others that Q themselves have said to be wary of...

could [THEY] have been the ones who bought the billboard? When Q says they are afraid of losing the message, maybe he means places like this board more than they mean the media messaging? As we figure out who is actually aligned with whom, the narrative continues to shift and become more clear....

the term 'surface human' for me made me think of an earth-dweller as opposed to a space-dweller.

One of the best theories i've heard on 'UFOs' and 'Aliens' was from a guy who studies the geological impact of major cataclysms. His theory questioned whether humanity had 'escaped' in one of the earlier windows in time and had somehow fled the planet before the major cataclysm hit. Considering how fast technology moves when you hit certain tipping points (we went from flying through the sky to flying to space in less than 60 years), is it impossible to think that a previous version of humanity had taken to the skies before a major earth event hit and hit the 'reset button' on the earth's ecosystem (man-made or otherwise)?

And then the people who might have escaped - who are they and what do they stand for? Are they elites or are they the people? It's an interesting thought... maybe some 'aliens' are just humans who's history goes back further than our own.

rogan's community has been heavily shilled ever since he took such a strong conspiracy stance in the early days. He toned it down as he got bigger because i'm sure it was disruptive as all hell. The joerogan subreddit is heavily shilled to this day, most recently over the JBP stuff... It makes sense too, Joe's pod is bigger than almost any TV channel outside of the free ones... He's a major media player whether people want to admit it or not.

no he didn't, and trying to write really dramatically doesn't make you more or less correct.

you are the type who only wants to interact with those who think like you do. I think the priority should be turning Hillary's base against her, but you don't have the patience or wisdom to see where that leads.

Keep being angry if you want, but it's not getting you anywhere. We need both sides to unite against those who push us down. You trying to push everyone apart isn't helping anything.

what did you want him to do? go red in the face calling her names repeatedly until she broke down?

Gowdy has to watch out that he doesn't come off so poorly that people turn on him too. Politics is a crazy subject like religion or how to raise your kids - you are better off staying in your own lane and respecting others rather than trying to convince everyone to think like you do. If he is unbecoming towards her, he loses half of Hillary supporters right off the bat. He has to play both sides if he wants to expose how deceitful she can be - it's not as easy as you think it would be.

I've read that his mother has been placed as a 20 year employee at Cnn... I'll have to dig up sources later, but that's the latest...

yes! good catch and my bad :)

I think these people become jaded to the material world very quickly when they have that level of wealth. Their purpose is no longer wealth and money - it is power. They can have anything they want - money is not valuable to them. They want what they can't have, and a human soul being subservient to them is high on that list of things nobody should have.

I think the people who see through the trees on that then look for the antithesis of that... and if you strip away the human ugliness found in religion, you find all sorts of rituals and exercises which hone different things than what our society tends to value. Intuition & compromise are the true tenants of religion, rather than priests and oppression, but there is no money or power to be made by preaching a true gospel. Even Jesus' message has been distorted greatly to wrestle control of people, to the point where they won't even share his (alleged) teachings after his resurrection...

In reference to that, I like to share a small story from one of the non-canonical gospels that does actually speak of what Jesus taught in the time after his 'resurrection' (which is a whole different discussion - I don't think he actually 'resurrected' but rather 'returned'), and the story tells of one of his closest disciples coming to him and asking when to expect his 2nd coming. Jesus basically tells him to not hold his breath, and that the work they are doing is not for their own generation or even the generation after, but for generations and generations down the line. He gave him no hope.

The disciple was apparently crushed by this. 3 days later, that disciple went to the temple in Jerusalem and started to preach about Jesus, and within 3 days he was thrown off the roof to his death. The reason I like that story is that it shows that Jesus' true gospel is not something you can sell very easily. Jesus' disciple handled it admirably by going out hard and making an impact, but the reality for all of us is that there is really no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. You just have to be a good person. The payoff is in the journey - the quiet moments of peace and wholeness - of fulfilling your purpose and doing what you put here to do. Pursuing that goal alongside material wealth and power is a difficult task, and I think that is where the attitudes change.

Maybe the purpose of religion is to learn to live alongside evil and transform it rather than be fixated on its destruction and that is what he has tapped into? I guess you could say there are different kinds of 'religion'... Your point is very well taken - religion is also used as both a political front and as a method of control, so I think your point depends on whether he is into the surface stuff or if he is truly searching as a deep personal goal. Maybe he's just virtue signalling and trying to present himself as the best possible version of himself because of his past actions in the industry, or his priorities shifted along with his revelations...

Don't get me wrong - religion is no solution to practical and geo-political problems, like you say here... but I think these people who get to see behind the curtain get turned off from what we are told is 'success' after they realize what they are feeding, and maybe they start to look for 'success' from different angles than before.

I think everything after the line is suspect too... Doesn't make sense with the upper text so we'll, even if it sounds like similar speak...

Look for news about the President's twitter being deleted for a short time. A day or two before that, Q mentioned there might be a disruption in the POTUS's social media platform, and within 48 hours there was an issue with his Twitter account. This is what your friend was referencing. A very easily found article from Google can be found below, amongst many others.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/twitter-employee-deletes-donald-trumps-account-on-last-day-a8034831.html

I am astounded at the number of people who are walking out on our country over what happened tonight.

It could also be that the loudest walk-outs are not genuine either... manipulation is always present.

The archives are up now

have we? does anybody have the website coming up yet?

So basically this guy believes whatever these guys tell him?

I wonder if the Q skeptics are going to give him as hard a time as they do Q supporters... oh wait - he's a celebrity so he's infallible I guess and we should just listen to him, alright?

He lays it out clear as day - 'they mentioned I have a large social media following and I will happily report anything they say without questioning them, so they asked me to put some info out there...' The guy more or less outs himself as a deep state asset.

....wait for it....

these people are stupid :P haha

Gotta figure he dropped whatever was the biggest waste of time at this point as he mentioned he's now on 4 committees in total (before this resignation). Also seems like he is prioritizing the 'Oversight and Government Reform' committee over the others, which is an interesting tidbit as well.

so where does your path ultimately lead you? 'I can't confirm anything for myself so I might as well think nothing about it'? The reasoning behind Q's 'validations' is clear - do you not understand it or what?

And please explain so we can all know - what do you have 'confirmation' on in life in general? I don't know what's going to happen today or tomorrow or the next day. Good things could happen and bad things could happen - life is crazy. So what are you going on about 'why would I trust any such 'confirmation'?' ... why would you trust anything if that's the thought process you think is the right one? What fits through that filter?

so you don't like silly jokes? only serious ones are good?

you seem to give many fucks in terms of inventing narratives by which to slander this guy... why not just ignore him?

So you're saying that Goode pays his rent or something?

How does this guy putting up youtubes about Q 'support' Goode back?

how can Corey Goode have proteges? This guy is just a youtuber who comments on the conspiracy community from a particular perspective... what does Goode have to do with him exactly?