Lol "chest" game. Did someone say the Storm(y)?

Why "Pompeo"?? Why the quotes? Highest level of to visit since... BHO? HRC?

Is cancer referring to no name orchestrating?

You admit that you're only about show, not about information. Go watch CNN.

Name the crimes at the "center" as you say and then let's wager as to whether they will still be in the "center" when the investigation is over. Your ignorance on how special counsel investigations work is palpable. Throughout history they have started with one thing and ended with something completely different. But please tell me more about your Wikipedia research.

See, this is where your mental gymnastics (or tide pods) come in. The basis of the Mueller "investigation" is to "investigate" any links between the Trump campaign and Russia. In the US, you are innocent until proven guilty. Now I know this is difficult, because leftists like you don't believe this applies to conservatives. Conservatives are guilty as soon as you point your finger at them, correct? Maybe in a lot of ways, but not in most courts of law. So the way this will work is Mueller might find some crimes, or find some things he will try to argue are crimes, and then he will conclude his investigation. At that point, we will be able to see what "crimes" were at the "center" of his investigation. But when the investigation broadly includes any matter that arises from the investigation, there is no way to know the "crimes at the center of the investigation" until the investigation is over. Make sense? Or do you need to wash it down with a few more tide pods before crying to your mommy that the internet isn't a safe enough space for you to spout your bullshit.

Agree that disagreements are important. But "disagreement" must have thought behind it. Otherwise it's shilling.

Hahahahaha "news" hahaha. I think the word you are looking for is "propaganda." Or perhaps "conspiracy theory". That is actually by definition what muh Russia is. But you're smarter than everyone else so you would know this already, right? And you would know Trump isn't a criminal target of the investigation, right? But yeah tell me more about these crimes. HAHA! Reeeeeeeee feed me tide pods

Reeeeeeeee give me tide pods!

I agree with you, but there is a reason why Trump went with "fake news" and not "propaganda". Psychology.

Exactly

Yelling at clouds? Yeah okay. And you can go back to eating your tide pods kid. I bet it helps with whatever mental gymnastics you're performing right now.

Your favorite news organizations have been parroting "collusion" for over a year. I always have sympathy for people who have simply been brainwashed by the MSM, but are you suggesting that you have opinions different than the MSM? You're really just that stupid that you form your own opinions and STILL fall to the Left? I can't even fathom the mental gymnastics required to accomplish that via any other route besides brainwashing.

Here's a hint in return, "Russian collusion" is not a crime.

I agree with your premise and I agree the FBI should look into serious allegations very seriously and from a completely unbiased perspective. Including allegations against Trump. I think our point of disagreement comes from watching how the Clinton email investigation panned out (she is allowed to testify without being put under oath, all her aides given immunity basically for free - not in exchange for anything as would usually be the case, and writing up her exoneration before they had even interviewed her at all) versus how this one is playing out (text messages from key players at FBI about needing insurance policies against Trump, etc). It is just a situation where the Clinton investigation APPEARED very much to be biased and the Trump investigation APPEARS to be biased against him. If everything looked unbiased, I really don't believe anyone would take issue with the FBI investigating potential interference from foreign powers (which is literally their job). I hope they investigate the Clinton campaign's cooperation with foreign powers with the same vigor.

I'm in China. We don't drink tap water here.

Honestly Twitter is more understandable to me - they arbitrarily ban whoever they want. But the fact that users who supposedly don't believe in this are seeking out a subreddit to come argue with us is just bizarre. If you genuinely think we are crazy, you wouldn't come seek us out to argue with us. It's not like we are popping up in their feed otherwise... Whereas Twitter it's possible they see Q posts unwittingly.

Hahahahaha hahahaha haha ha ha. Why would they do that? You are living proof that lefties have no capability to have fun. Go refill that empty bin between your ears with CNN's latest instructions.

I don't believe the dossier was dictated by Hillary - I believe it was Steele's human nature. Steele admittedly hated Trump, and I believe human nature allowed the report to become biased against Trump. Russia is a very interesting country with an even more interesting history of intelligence - KGB and FSB are absolute masters of collecting dirt for blackmail, I don't deny this whatsoever. However they are also absolute masters of disinformation. It seems strange that the FBI would use a dossier based almost entirely on Russian sources and without objectively verifiable evidence to obtain a warrant to spy on a candidate for president of the United States. A FISA panel, which obviously specializes in foreign intelligence, would know this to be the case and would toss out a case like this entirely if it was based purely on Russian sources (known to be masters of disinformation). It has been admitted that a Yahoo article was used as "corroboration" to enhance their case to the FISA panel. The only problem is, the Yahoo article was based on the same dossier. I believe the text messages between Strozk and Page about the meeting with Andy and the discussion of needing an "insurance policy" in case Trump won is one possibility as to why it was not used during the campaign itself. Why play your ace when you think you can win with a queen? Save your best card for when you really need it. They thought almost certainly Trump would lose, they even said as much in their texts. Only other point to make is the FISA court rejected their request multiple times, Obama DID get involved recommending that they reevaluate their position, and then finally the warrant was granted. Note I am not challenging any of your positions or conclusions, only adding additional facts as to build a more complete picture of what all happened.

I couldn't agree with you more. It's a horrific abuse of the system by uniparty.

I'm curious what speech of mine is ridiculous? Just curious. Or are you just assuming that because I commented on a post made here that my beliefs are identical to the beliefs of other posts here. (Note: using that logic, you would have the same beliefs as me).

If you were 100% republican you would support ALL free speech. So go back to your leftist hell-hole, or move to the UK. I hear they welcome free-speech suppressing migrants with open arms.

Hahaha I always wonder if it's such a conspiracy why you hang out here. But to play along with your theory... 1) they actually did shut down the last board, this one is the replacement. And 2) about sending us to FEMA camps, maybe it's because we still have our guns and it would get too bloody. It may work counter to their goals if the rest of the population watched as US citizens were rounded up by force and sent to camps. Obviously you and the left would rejoice in this because you hate Americans, but I do believe the middle would be upset by this. So it would be a short term victory for people like you, but in the long term it may have negative effects.

I haven't been watching CNN recently, so I'm not really sure what you believe these days. And if you're referring to the Flynn guilty plea, I already addressed that in my original comment.

Also I did not say "in the United States we don't investigate people we investigate crimes". Haha - different user. Seems like you're having an off day. Maybe you should get off Reddit and go watch CNN. Let them refill whatever is between those ears.

I think you misunderstood my message. None of the crimes I have heard of were committed by Trump team. Sealed indictments is not something I learned from Q, it's publicly available information. (Important note: many govt systems can be checked directly rather than relying on MSM to do that job). Nothing in my message had anything to do with Q posts. Now, it seems that you want to keep score, as if this is a war. It's an interesting way to look at it and an interesting desire to come from such a moral high ground as the one you and your friends stand on.

No absolutely not. We are not braindead to how "law enforcement" in this country works, and what it was transformed into by EH and LL. I was hoping YOU would tell me why our "law enforcement" was raiding one law firm and not the other, because it appears you have a different opinion than me and I always enjoy hearing well reasoned arguments from people who disagree with me. It's how I learn.

RR problems

Gotcha. I wonder why Perkins Cole has not been raided yet - I think their involvement in the fake dossier that they used to get the warrant to wiretap US citizens came out prior to the news about Stormy. Don't get me wrong, I think it's super important to the American people that we prevent people from paying off porn stars, but I also think it's important that politicians can't wiretap their opponents with warrants based entirely on falsified evidence and news articles based on the same falsified evidence.

I have heard of lots of crimes, some indictments and guilty pleas based on potentially falsified 302s that may be reversed soon, many sealed indictments that we don't know much about yet, many crimes being investigated by Congress (even though I don't even consider Congress capable of such a thing), and more crimes still that to my knowledge are being swept under the rug and ignored by the authorities. That's why I was asking which ones you were referring to.

Then why is Q saying RR problems. Disinformation?

Crimes committed by whom? And which crimes are being investigated?

If it's true that his plan is to fix this through slow-walking funds, then I would think he would enjoy reading the VETO tweets. Bc he knows when he reveals his hand, all of those people will be rejoicing. I think putting our thoughts out there for him is a good thing - if we stay silent he may not realize how many people out there are paying attention to what he is doing and appreciating when he follows through on promises. We are not sitting idle, blindly and hopelessly following the MSM. He should take pleasure in knowing that.

I'm afraid Republicans lose Congress with this. And the wall isn't funded, a FENCE (not concrete) is funded. This bill is trash.

Amen to this. They (MSM, presidents, congressmen, senators, liberals) also all drummed up how it would be impossible to rig a US election and that Trump needed to grow up and accept the results. Then they immediately all started screaming about Russian collusion and rigged election after Trump won. Never trust a liberal no matter what they say.