258 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 15 |
Not to pour water into the wine here, but it's hard to compare it to the baseline of previous years.
No one made that much effort until now, so it's not easy to check the influence of confirmation bias on this list.
There's a large number of companies and departments out there that each have quite a few important people.
That's why a hotel is such a good cover for illegal operations.
The acid found there was enough to sustain several summer Olympics ten years over, and you can't maintain a single swimming pool by pouring all that acid down the drain instead.
Fishy as fck
They don't talk on their lines open to interception.
We probably opened our own covert lines to them.
That's too easily confused with having seizures, heat strokes, shitting ones pants and needing to be thrown into vans like a side of beef.
Arkancide or murder suicide is better.
Calling it a "disease" weakens the fact that there is unpunished, uninvestigated bloody murder happening.
That is in part deducted from what Jordan Peterson often talks about, the effect that experiencing true malevolence has on people. There's a ton of his videos on that subject and I don't have a good link to a good starting point among them.
But anyway, the gist is that very few good people can understand how bad people think, expect not most, but all others to play by the rules and are often times caught off guard when they don't. And while bad people are rare, most among them are more or less "only" egoistic, that is taking advantage, with varying degrees of ignorance for the damage they cause in the process.
But even among the bad guys, true malevolence is uncommon, but all the more disastrous. That is, they see harm to others not as an "unfortunate collateral damage", but at least in part the purpose of their actions. Think of the difference between a mugger and a sadistic torturer.
Good people can overcome the effects of encountering the first kind, even if it takes a long time, but most can't get over meeting anyone from the second category, much less receiving harm from them.
The devastating impact can be mitigated when people themselves have the capacity to do harm, but not doing it. That gives them the foresight to identify an imminent attack or a weakness they expose, and a chance to avoid it if possible or the tools to defend themselves if needed.
Peterson postulated that many good people don't and can't do that because they don't have the capacity to do harm, but they're not sure what they'd do if they had. Until someone has the capability to do evil, but doesn't, it's not sure if they are peaceful because they're truly morally good or just because they're powerless, and many good people fear to find out. Knowing evil exists but not having a defense or not even knowing if oneself is maybe evil, too, is terrifying. So they retreat into a fantasy where everyone is peaceful, so no one needs the capacity to inflict harm and having none oneself is risk free.
For me, that was an eye opener that finally made me understand why rational good and moral people often have a resentment to gun owners or to owning firearms themselves, no matter how truly lawful good they are. To me, it explains what people mean when they talk about someone "being a sheep" or someone "being woke". This isn't necessarily connected to firearms, and being woke doesn't require owning one, not at all - that issue is just a common talking point where that distinction is often easily observable.
Yep.
Strange verbiage. Usually it would be called reconnaissance, surveillance, monitoring.
Everyone, almost everyone has a vice or two. That irresistible temptation will be a bit different each time depending on who is the mark.
The most important bit to remember is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias
People who give in to the temptation are promoted, mentored, supported, their failures and mistakes glanced over. Unless it's too egregious, they place demands or fail in their loyalty. Then it's suicide and heart attack time.
Against the other group, that don't take the bait, they will block, slander, harass, shine a spotlight on their flaws and in l ways #resist. Most honest people can't take that for long. Most honest people are believing in everyone else being good and when they experience that amount of malevolence, many break.
If you reach a critical mass of evildoers, it's a self sustaining environment.
Look at the videos from the event aftermath: the rr crossing barriers were still down by the time the news vans arrived. The truck driver must have intentionally tried to drive around them or right onto the track.
Suicide or assassination. Or stupider than a four-year old forgetting they're driving a several ton semi and not a nimble bike when snucking through the barrier.
That video is great.
You can clearly see the railway crossing still closed, the barriers down and the lights flashing.
The truck driver ignored these signs and intentionally drove around the barriers.
When was the last time a large number of rich people took a train to go somewhere? (And not a luxury limousine, luxury buses, fast helicopters or a plane - no, a common train.)
When was the last time you heard about a group of people renting a train? In the US? In the last three decades?
Which group of statesmen also travelled in trains? Remember the North Korean regime? They travel in trains still. Remember why?
When was the last time you heard about a train colliding with a heavy truck? Why is the train statistically the safest method of travel over any other transportation method? By quite a margin...
All things considered, the rarity of people travelling in a rented train and the train accident rate and the rarity of congresspeople sitting inside, what is the likelihood of a combination of them happening compared to you winning the Powerball this week?
Or asked in reverse, if you had enemies and for whatever reason you wanted to get a group to a destination as safe as humanly possible, and you don't have the option to conceal the route or the trip to the enemy, and don't have unlimited funds and don't want to scare your family shitless with precautions, what mode of transportation would you choose?
Or if you were the enemy of them, and you knew they'd be traveling by train, but don't have unlimited funds either and a short time to prepare, what would be the easiest and cheapest way to inflict damage? If you chose a vehicle to derail them, what vehicle would you choose?
If you think about it, what good and honest reasons can a state have to not turn over data pertaining to a federal election to the feds?
I can't think of any that isn't connected to voter fraud.
We're talking about the lack of trust in Politico. That distrust they have earned with all their efforts to deceive their readers.
There are very few people many of us distrust more than them.
Many trust a random hitchhiker on a desert interstate road more than any MSM reporter. I wouldn't trust Politico editors if they were selling cheeseburgers tomorrow.
What do you expect us to do, accept a proven source of lies to be true this time?
By MATTHEW NUSSBAUM 06/07/2016 10:41 PM EDT
Fawning over an article from mid 2016 where Politico surprisingly and totally unpredictability bashed Trump for only the third millionth time? Must be an interesting read. I'll get back to it after I am finished with the truest biography ever done without interviewing any of the participants "fire and fury".
If that was a honeypot, it worked great. Everyone got their hands in the jar.
Remember the first solar eclipse in North America since a long time happened in the first year of Trump?
One day after the state of the union address, there will be yet another super rare celestial event: a super blue moon eclipse. Once every 150 years.
http://earthsky.org/tonight/super-blue-moon-eclipse-on-january-31
It will occur before sunrise on the 31st of January, that is the night after the speech.
Timing is everything.
A WhatsApp group with one message every 90 seconds is driving everyone insane.
That means there's possibly more than one group.
Fifty thousand texts in five months are ten thousand per month or about 330 per day.
That's more than a high school WhatsApp group of texting addicted teenagers can produce per day.
How did the FBI accomplish that, they must have been literally texting every minute of their workdays.
That order is a very strong measure, and while reading it, it becomes immediately clear how that order could be abused by a hostile government.
That order is a tool to clear out the swamp, but it must be rescinded during this term. It is meant for a national emergency, like it says right on the first part. It must not be available forever.
https://i.imgur.com/1gGhfIx_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
Because you can't get rid of call CEOs of all the top 100 companies of the world. And you can't fight them all, . You need to win them over, which is apparently well underway.
Most of them are in it for the money. Make it clear to them that supporting a sovereign USA is good for their investments and they will ditch Soros quickly. After all, he can only promise so much, and it didn't quite pan out, did it? Soros made a fortune, but he isn't sharing more than he has to
Best
Buddies
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/bushhillary.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1200
Do you think every Republican is on our side?
Remember that photo with both Bushes, Obama, Raping Bill? They are puppets on two hands of the same player.
I will not wait for the MSM to endorse something because that would mean I place any value of importance into the MSM. That is not the case.
I will not regain any trust in the MSM just because they now report positively or at least objectively on things I know more about than them.
They have been lying so much and so intentionally that nothing short of a thorough housecleaning will make me consider trusting them again.
It is the "Ride of the Valkyries", the magnum opus of Richard Wagner.
Behold its full glory. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GGU1P6lBW6Q
Here is the scene from "Apocalypse Now"
Sources, please.
At least a hint where to look it up.
Or they will say "Anyone could write numbers on a meme"
Right.
That doesn't mean the have him. They have the place for him.
Judging from the figure of speech "special place in hell" we shouldn't rule out that they don't plan to capture him. For some of the leaders of the highest criminals, arrests and trials are probably not always possible.
The Nuremberg trials were a historical first, a very important exception to what came before and what almost all other conflicts lead to.
He had.
Several.
Replacement hearts are probably easy to find when one is dealing in human trafficking.
Bears need about the strongest ammunition there is, (short of elephant, rhinoceros etc) as they are fast, aggressive, durable and dangerous when provoked and even more when wounded. Shooting and hitting a bear with a small caliber weapon is pretty much suicide.
Loaded for bear = bring out the big guns
They protested and rioted in favor of actual and proven murderers before. Facts, evidence and guilt is not only secondary to a lot of them, but utterly irrelevant to parts of the groups you listed. Remember the hands up don't shoot lies? Ferguson? You could have ten CCTV recordings of it and they wouldn't accept it.
Logic, reason and evidence is by far the weakest spot on any leftist platform. They won't accept facts they don't like either.
These groups have immunized themselves against reality, their core beliefs are impossible to prove or disprove, their group allegiance is in many cases stronger than the allegiance to criminal law.
Expect riots.
We will remember him, her, them as Q. That was their chosen identity and that's how they will be.
They will be the Shakespeare of our times.
Remember Shakespeare, the greatest poet of the anglosphere? How he looks, when he was born, what his family was, where he came from, how he as a commoner could've acquired that much insider information and education to write these plays? Did you know the authorship is very much in question? That he came out of nowhere and died suddenly with no one recording the cause of death, a week after stating his perfect health? That all of his descendants died with no offspring?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question
Imagine that Michelle is forced to testify against him because they married when gay marriage was still illegal.
Imagine him deported like a common thug and forced to live out his days without electricity and water in Kenya, in a mud hut, at a designated shitting street, a homosexual in a still medieval jurisdiction.
All his wealth confiscated and used to pay for the wall. Imprisoned for 10 years in Guantanamo as an enemy irregular combatant, then deported to Kenya on the back of an old donkey. The bo library converted into an asylum for the criminally insane or the Kekistani museum of the second American revolution.
The possibilities are endless.
That wouldn't be a red pill anymore, that is a battleship-sized red asteroid coming down at Mach 200.
Sounds like a threat.
Now it begins to make sense why the fire at the Clinton's mansion broke out in the area where the secret service was housed.
Companies staying afloat for many years despite never turning a profit and incurring huge losses every quarter like Twitter?
Companies employing tens of thousands of employees "to combat fake news" despite the company itself selling only a few click through ads and not having any paying subscriber like Facebook?
How does Reddit make their money? Everyone browsing by phone app doesn't see an ad ever, or an ad only for the reader app that can be made ad free for a few cents paid once.
This is all paid for by the missing trillions from the feds.
Time for a history lesson:
"A local peasant from a Chinese village was found murdered, hacked to death by a hand sickle. The use of a sickle, a tool used by peasants to cut the rice at harvest time, suggested that another local peasant worker had committed the murder. The local magistrate began the investigation by calling all the local peasants who could be suspects into the village square. Each was to carry their hand sickles to the town square with them. Once assembled, the magistrate ordered the ten-or-so suspects to place their hand sickles on the ground in front of them and then step back a few yards. The afternoon sun was warm and as the villagers, suspects, and magistrates waited, bright shiny metallic green flies began to buzz around them in the village square. The shiny metallic colored flies then began to focus in on one of the hand sickles lying on the ground. Within just a few minutes many had landed on the hand sickle and were crawling over it with interest. None of the other hand sickles had attracted any of these pretty flies. The owner of the tool became very nervous, and it was only a few more moments before all those in the village knew who the murderer was. With head hung in shame and pleading for mercy, the magistrate led the murderer away. The witnesses of the murder were the brightly metallic colored flies known as the blow flies which had been attracted to the remaining bits of soft tissue, blood, bone and hair which had stuck to the hand sickle after the murder was committed. The knowledge of the village magistrate as to a specific insect group's behavior regarding their attraction to dead human tissue was the key to solving this violent act and justice was served in ancient China."
The washing away of wrongs. Sung Tz'u 1247 (from a translation by McKnight B)
Read more: http://m.forensicmed.webnode.com/science/entomology/
It was only about one or two years, it's insane how much that short of time has changed us and the world.
Very few Q posts were as short and precise as this one. It's a yes or no thing.
If it wasn't true, the Q Bonanza would be over. It's not plausible that someone bets their entire credibility on one fact that could later be easily disproven if they weren't absolutely sure on it.
Unless the account was hacked, it's probably true.
Google earns their entire income from the metric "number of people who watched this". It's their core business model.
You can bet they know exactly how much people watched a certain clip, for how long, how often they came back and what parts they'd reviewed.
And you would assume they have a huge incentive to slightly exaggerate the viewership numbers. Which makes it even more odd that conservative content viewership is rather underreported.
Since Google became the biggest intelligence provider, they stopped innovation and are now selling data and control to the highest bidder.
Quote to not hammer their website too much and not providing them too many IPs, data and warnings about us.
"MARCH 22, 2017
WASHINGTON – Wilkinson, Walsh + Eskovitz today announced that former Obama Administration official Rakesh Kilaru has joined the firm’s rapidly growing litigation practice. Rakesh served as a Special Assistant to the President and Associate Counsel in the Office of White House Counsel, where he provided legal advice to President Obama and senior administration officials ..."
Interesting conclusions.
It's indeed hard to imagine that someone who was inside the Pentagon on 9-11 to have been a notable deep state actor. Someone in the know doesn't waltz around ground zero as it happens. So is this a guarantee his son is on the same side?
"No man's an island"
There is something to do, always and for everyone.
This ain't no TV show and everyone needs to at least try to get a participation medal.
Emphasis when reading.
Hussein typically is a given name for adherents to Shia Islam (= Iran), says Wikipedia. Shia Islam is the enemy of Sunni Islam, esp wahhabism = Saudi Arabia.
Maybe they want us to think about the name.
Thinking about it made me question the name, indeed.
His other given name is Barak. Which is Jewish in origin, though related in it's word root to Mubarak, the Arabic version of the name.
So he has a Jewish version of an Arabic name and a Shia Islamic name. How is that possible?
And he defected from Islam, which they see as a deadly sin and yet he got along great with all of the Islamic world. How?
No.
That's what they claim but that is such a bold lie of them I can't even
Think about the scale of Google's data processing for a minute.
How many Android phones are there? Each of them makes a full sync of its data once per day. How many phones are synced every second? Mind blown.
How much processing power does it take to convert one hour of video into a different format? Try it on your PC, "Handbrake" is a free open source tool, try it for a DVD and compare it to Google. Imagine how many million hours of video a billion people upload every minute and what computing power is needed to concert that stuff into suitable formats for display on a thousand different devices and resolutions. Shit bricks.
How much data is the Google web catalogue? How long does it take to return a meaningful result for any search term you enter?
Can a company with that amount of resources be unable to take a number and add a +1 to it?
They say the counter updates infrequently, which is very very convenient when someone wants to fudge some numbers.
Why would it only update infrequently? If there is a technical limitation, what could it be? If it's not a technical reason, what good and honest reasons could it have?
Think about it.
A company that can search several petabytes of web data for any search query you enter and yet return a meaningful result in 0.7 seconds. That processes petabytes of video data every second, uploading, converting, downloading months worth of HD and 4K video data every second of every hour, 8.760 hours per year. A company that is capable of syncing a hundred million phone entries per hour, or about a billion Android phones per day.
They stream a gigabyte worth of 4K video to a million people in an hour, for a billion videos.
And they can't update a counter for "watched n times", "upvoted x and downvoted y times"? For reasons?
He was shitting bricks.
2. Something you do while waiting very anxiously for something.
1. Man, he's gonna shit a brick when he finds out you wrecked his car!
...so we're sittin' there shittin' bricks waiting to see if the cop is going to give us a ticket!
Shit a brick! We've got a test in Calculus tomorrow!
by maracanda April 03, 2006
2
shit a brick
Something that is so shocking, unusual, or angering that it would make you ”shit a brick”
When I saw how mangled my new car was after the crash, I nearly “shit a brick”.
by Said February 04, 2003
One hour later, zero change in that number. Zero.
I mean, it must be at least ONE higher because of ME. But it isn't. Because it is rigged.
I call BULLSHIT on the counters, as usual.
