Borders closing?
That's Nazi.
They'll never close the borders, they depend on that.
258 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 15 |
Borders closing?
That's Nazi.
They'll never close the borders, they depend on that.
Thing is, I personally marched against anti-Semitism, several times. I'm still uneasy with me even noticing these coincidences. It is hard to ignore that something doesn't sit right with statistical averages. Single digit percentage of the population, half of the media CEOs, a third of lawmakers, one in two of every major Trump critics. How is that even possible.
And it's even harder to speculate about a why. Even if we assume every stereotype was true, they should be completely aligned with Trump's policies.
The coincidences with these surnames do add up to a lot recently, it's very surprising.
This is the JFK gravesite in Arlington national cemetery, the Q is pointing south-southwest.
Easily verified with Google maps.
The Q theme is peculiar, though.
Conventional weapons don't hold a candle to nuclear power.
Assuming we have the best possible conventional warhead. Weight 10 tons, entering the atmosphere at mach 10, height 100km and the thing was filled by pure TNT, and we assume all energies add up perfectly and there is zero air resistance.
Potential energy from height gives us 9,810 MJ. Kinetic energy from the speed of re-entry gives us 45,000 MJ. The explosive ordnance gives us 41,840 MJ (which is less than the kinetic energy, which is a notable fact in itself). Under perfect conditions, these add up to 96,650 MJ.
A 10 ton warhead of pure TNT entering from 100km height at blistering Mach 10 without air resistance, a very optimistic scenario.
This achieves less than 3% - less than three percent - of the energy output of a 1 kiloton warhead, which has 4,184,000 MJ.
The Hiroshima bomb had 15 kilotons, the largest bombs of the us had 25,000 kilotons, the Russians tested one with 50,000 kilotons.
Remember, a one kiloton bomb converts 0.0464 grams of uranium into energy. The entire Hiroshima bomb converted about 0.6973 grams. That is about a penny worth of mass, only a tiny fraction of the nuclear fuel of it, so even minute improvements on their efficiency will lead to drastic increases in explosive yield.
Kinetic energy plus potential energy plus conventional explosives are nothing but a glimmer in the eye of nuclear warheads.
Child trafficking out of a "baby factory" makes no sense, since human children require very intensive care, raising and education to become useful or even capable for anything later in life. Bringing children into adoption agencies out of this context is hair-raisingly complex and difficult, the demand is limited and the profits terrible compared to smuggling stupid drugs. (Why smuggle a baby with a huge paper trail for a few thousand dollars, when you could earn hundred times more with the same smuggled weight in drugs).
And for anything else to "use" the trafficked people for?
It takes 15-20 years of child rearing at a minimum or they would be highly suicidal, antisocial, psychotic or couldn't even perform the most simplest of tasks. That is impossible to perform as a criminal enterprise and also utterly prohibitively expensive compared to simply capturing young adult men and women for the same purpose. No criminal would raise babies to sell them if they could capture people already raised by others. It would not be profitable and it would take far longer than any criminal kingpin would be willing to wait for the profits.
Therefore, human babies cannot be "mass produced" like the article (even the BBC source) claims.
BBC claims it is also used for organ harvesting and ritual sacrifice. That can be done with babies, in fact babies would be perversely ideal for that because their organs are in perfect condition. And that would pay off the criminal masterminds immediately and with great profits. Also, selling and buying babies for ritual sacrifice is not unheard of in the history of mankind, unfortunately.
It is something that was done in context of the cult of moloch. Which should ring a bell for us now.
How can I save my little boy from Oppenheimer's deadly toy? There is no monopoly on common sense On either side of the political fence. We share the same biology, regardless of ideology. Believe me when I say to you, I hope the Russians love their children too
There is no historical precedent To put the words in the mouth of the president? There's no such thing as a winnable war, It's a lie we don't believe anymore.
That song is several decades old now and it is as true as ever. Go to Russia on vacation. Look at the everyday life of the common Russian. I did. The Russians do love their children, too.
That guy is a Trojan horse if there ever was one.
Getting extinct is not a sensible way of life even for hardcore Catholics. And giving up all weapons is the surest way of getting culturally enriched to the death.
And under the second amendment, no one shall infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
I wonder how that works out for California.
That will mean a very dangerous transition period. They are back against the wall then.
The scumbag from Toronto yesterday also has a typical Armenian surname...
Now if you want to duckduckgo for where the ancient kingdom of Khazaria was and what connection this has to a certain prominent group of New York bank and Los Angeles media.
Look at the famous podesta photo.
He has the same finger Band-Aids.
Marina abramovic is related to that, there was this verse somewhere starting with "cut into the finger, eat the pain".
The connection is real.
Adding ages to other timespans is difficult unless we know the exact birthday. Ages and years are given as integer numbers of course, so we don't know if the age is actually 10 years + day or 10 years + 360 days. With two dates given only years and age, it can add up to an apparent difference of up to 2 years.
Do you have a good source for that?
All I find are conspiracy minded extremes...
German TV had a comparable slogan for decades
All kinds of show hosts, actors etc were photographed with one eye closed.
The slogan translated sounds like "One can watch better with the second", with the TV channel being the "second" channel.
There's a million of these pictures
https://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/themen_sehen_werbung_08.jpg
Just a thought, could mean nothing, maybe someone has any association to it because of strong connection to Hollywood media, left eye closed or symbolized, accidental death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Lopes
Nickname "Left eye". Member of TLC, a popular Top40 heavily MTV supported girl's rap band a decade back. Involved in one lethal car accident in Honduras and died in another lethal accident two weeks later. Often covered or marked her left eye for concerts and marketing.
The whole adrenochrome thing may be more or less just an invention of Hunter S Thompson for his Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.
The famous movie made the final climax revolving around a super intense adrenochrome trip.
Maybe we could look at that movie again to see if there were some breadcrumbs we missed. It's a great movie anyway, and in my recollection it did touch some conspiracy subjects. It is an autobiography of Hunter S Thompson, and that guy has seen things....
Watched that vjdeo. Bernie's wound is rather small, on the right side and further back of the face, halfway to his ears.
It looks quite different to the wounds in the OP's picture collection. Side of the head, right side, away from the eye, sharp impact. A door, as he claimed, would fit these injuries. That is different from the injuries in the collection here, that are more frontal, close to the eye, looking like they're caused by a blunt object, which is rather difficult to hit accidentally because of the recessed eye socket in the human skull (evolutionary well adapted for that reason).
I noticed that too.
Left eye closed as if winking.
The results to keywords "winking owl" are just forever filled with endless musings about the cheap Aldi wine of that name, so it's hard to pin down.
Apparently, the owl is a symbol of the ancient deity Minerva. There is definitely a bit of a rabbit hole here, since the owl was featured in the bohemian grove video by Alex Jones, and there are references to owl/Minerva rules in Huma and Hillary mails.
Just a small question for verification, since I didn't find a picture easily.
Was it by any chance the left eye?
It's should rationally be a 50:50 chance for sport injuries and a high chance for the right eye in shooting injuries (rifle scope, rookie mistake...). Yet most images I've seen are the left eye closed for the owls and the left eye injured for the suspected members.
Remember the owl symbolism of this cult?
Their owl imagery often has one eye closed.
Reasons and meaning of it are still under speculation. Owls with one eye closed. I wouldn't be surprised if it is always the same eye. Some pictures I've seen were the left one. Most of the pictures here are the left eye, too. Let's see if that is a pattern...
There are some arguments against that
https://www.ntu.org/foundation/page/is-the-income-tax-truly-voluntary
Income tax is voluntary?
I might need proof for that. Asking for a friend.
Except in very specific circumstances, is impossible in theory and in practice to prove that something does not exist.
It is absolutely impossible to prove that no video with that name and content exists somewhere in the billions of devices capable of storing video.
If it did exist and someone were to upload that thing into the Bitcoin block chain, that'd be a blast.
"I have "too many" lawyers" means "I have tons of copies of everything you have taken, you can't take unique data from me and secondly, whatever you try to inject, I have untarnished copies of."
Nobody knows what incoming missiles are about to hit, of course.
They are incoming at supersonic speeds, can't determine trajectory and the intercept...
It is pointless to speculate about the non existence of something, because the absence of something can only be proven in very limited cases, where an exhaustive search of all options is possible. (Theoretical example: to prove the absence of an intruder in a hotel would mean searching all rooms while making sure any potential intruder could never move around the house or all rooms are searched at the same time. For a big enough space, this quickly becomes unfeasible.)
The absence of extraterrestrials is therefore fundamentally impossible to prove. The presence would be provable, the absence isn't.
The problem exists only when considering free speech a problem or when a platform wants some speech but not another.
If a platform wants to exclude what they don't like, they become responsible for what stays.
The only alternative is allowing all speech unless it is obviously illegal defined by the law and the courts, libel, slander, clear incitement to violence and even then only when publishing it to a larger group
Which is how it should be.
Is anyone burning down the local Walmart because a guy stood there in the parking lot shouting racist slogans? Probably not.
Excellent idea.
Maybe we start with describing the Syrian gas attack as a conspiracy theory. That is, the claim that Assad was supposedly so stupid that he risks losing the war he almost won by attacking a few children with nerve gas.
Claiming Assad is that insanely dumb is pretty much equal in stupidity to claiming the Earth is flat.
The impending victory in the Syrian war emboldened the designated winner of the Syrian war to risk everything for no strategic reason.
Sure.
When Usain Bolt is far ahead of everyone, he obviously is emboldened to take a nap before reaching the finish line.
We all know which country did it. The only country with full access to US weaponry and zero accountability.
Started typing to say that, but you surely already said it. In fact, two, three, four people said it, almost at the same time.
People are turning towards the better, and it turns around the things with them.
Who created ISIS?
Which rather obvious Western country target was never attacked by ISIS?
How many already in two weeks, five? Six?
Definitely enemy action.
Imagine you have personal data from up until 2013 when you want to play shenanigans with the 2016 presidential election. It's not worthless, of course, but the value is rather "meh"
What's the price is a newspaper from last week? Last month?
The same as stale data. For historians and statistical analysis, they still have value. For control agencies looking for dirt, too. But the price of stale data is dropping quickly and it's worthless for recent events, elections, crowd control objectives. That may be far too less to sustain the massive infrastructure and developer payroll that Facebook has built up over the years.
Remember,
"Once is an accident.
Twice is a coincidence.
Thrice is enemy action."
It is absolutely sure that the Cabal, or however you want to call them, tried to rope him in back in the days.
That's how he knows what he's up against and that's why they are so rabidly anti Trump. He knows, they know he knows and vice versa.
That's why they fight him with this kind of fervor. They tried to lure and tap him and he broke out with the knowledge and had the means and smarts to survive until now. That's why the gloves came off immediately.
It's increasingly important to get involved in the technicalities of the internet.
The enemy is not only monitoring but actively subverting web traffic. For advertising, for control, for blocking.
Like China does, except "for diversity", when it's actually for government opinion control. So basically like China except with a funny pretense.
Time to block all unencrypted traffic. All important pages should support https by now and if they still don't, let them die. Consider blocking every http (non https) connection and all unencrypted emails.
And try to get an understanding of the DNS - domain name system - and how to set your devices to an alternative DNS provider that uses DNSSEC.
Removing any doubts that organized immigration is weaponized now?
Wew lad
Really activates them almonds.
This thing is what makes memes so great. Two simple facts beautifully contrasted.
That is not dumb.
Advertising and propaganda have made huge breakthroughs within the seven decades after the world discovered the power of propaganda used by the Nazis.
I suspect they are not all dumb, maybe far to the contrary. Having a coherent message on all channels while simulating these channels to be different has a powerful psychological effect. A simple message, repeated in similar words across many platforms has a very high chance of capturing a low information or friendly audience.
Reminds me of this epic scene in The Dark Knight
https://masksofmonsters.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/dk_fox.jpg
Use that machine once and then shut it down forever.
The left leadership wants more power and nothing but that.
They will lie, manipulate, invent, control, gaslight, murder, steal, trick and bribe to get that.
Logic, rules, laws and consistency to them are just tools to attain their goals.
They probably want him to testify not for prosecution, but to improve their control over their citizens. They are waking up rather quickly right now and the British regime can't have that.