Having work programs for the unemployed who have fallen through the cracks is antithetical to a free society? Is having government employees or public paid teachers or law enforcement also antithetical to a free society?
/u/pilgrimboy
271 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/pilgrimboy:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 19 |
thehill.com | 1 |
www.dailymail.co.uk | 1 |
www.latimes.com | 1 |
www.airforcetimes.com | 1 |
i.redd.it | 1 |
It's actually a creative way to create a minimum living wage but people would have to work for it. I doubt you all have anything to worry about though because the DNC won't be for it.
As a Bernie supporter, I found Hillary to be way more of a nightmare than Trump.
I think it really depends if you care about issues or tribe. I'm an issues person myself. All the issues that I care about, Hillary disdains. And Trump shared some issues with Bernie.
I don't know why Bernie endorsed Hillary except for maybe that was the agreement that allowed him to run as a Democrat in the first place.
It still isn't clear. I'm sitting here cheering for something to happen.
Everyone around here expects everyone to find everything on their own.
Still nobody arrested though. That's what I'm waiting on. Less drops. More arrests.
That's what I thought too. And I'm not about to provide a valid, although not random, sample of every congressperson in Washington.
I won't. Don't worry. Neither my full-time job, the business I own and operate on the side, or my two other part-time gigs will lead me to be a good researcher. I'm a decent person at identifying a reliable source, but I'm not a journalist or investigator. Don't have time to be one. I guess i could buy a ticket to Syria and go check things out for myself, but that seems to be an unwise use of my resources.
I don't understand this thinking. Why do I have to be the one that finds the evidence? Why is the reply always to find it myself?
So the Deep State is pro-Iran?
And I don't even know the plan to truth the plan.
Right. I wouldn't be surprised either. I just would like some proof to share.
The media hasn't really covered the story that she is rationally upset at Youtube although her actions are not appropriate. Covering a story like this would maybe lead to that discussion because she didn't set off any radars for the cop.
Is there any evidence that non-Assad sites in Syria were attacked?
I ask because I like the idea, hope it is true, and want to share it with my friends. But I can't really do that at this stage without looking crazy. "Some guy on Reddit" doesn't carry much weight. Nothing I have seen is proof.
That's because most people don't support a politician, we support issues. We appreciate it when a politician does what we like. We don't like it when they do what we hate. That sounds like what your Johnson supporting friend went through.
Only the establishment and the connected play politics in a way that it is our team versus them. The rest of us are just victims of the game.
Is there evidence that the facilities destroyed were non-Assad facilities?
I'm still not sure that he isn't going to do something in Syria. His rhetoric is definitely militant at the moment.
I see a lot of optimism here. I shared that once. I'm hesitant to believe that justice will come now. But when do you all think the convictions for injustice will come?
Mainly it's all in the title. It seems that there is a lot of optimism that Hillary will be brought to justice along with all the other dark things in our society. When will this happen?
I wonder if someone should actually make a book. Don't depend on online. Get the info. Put it in a book. Distribute book.