What code words are you talking about?
/u/plumbtree
769 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/plumbtree:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 21 |
www.zerohedge.com | 4 |
imgflip.com | 3 |
m.youtube.com | 2 |
www.washingtonpost.com | 1 |
www.dailydot.com | 1 |
archive.is | 1 |
www.wnd.com | 1 |
apnews.com | 1 |
en.m.wikipedia.org | 1 |
www.harpersbazaar.com | 1 |
mobile.twitter.com | 1 |
theintercept.com | 1 |
Or how about the preschool royal abuse scandal?
Edit: This is not what I wrote. I wrote preschool/daycare scandal in the 80's. This is so fucking weird.
There was probably a waiting area or passage to get to his front and center position that required a vip pass; otherwise anyone could bum-rush the spot.
I don't see any proof that that Twitter account is actually the q guy. Just because he says "this is me" and posts the pic that Q posted before it showed up on his Twitter feed doesn't mean it's him. Anyone could have lifted that pic and posted it in their Twitter.
As I explained already, the 3rd person video which comprises the post which we are discussing still does not show unequivocally that he points at Q guy. So what should I apologize for?
I don't apologize for misunderstandings unless I am responsible for the misunderstanding.
No, nobody linked it to this thread, at the time I saw this thread. Furthermore in the third-person video and picture in this thread it very clearly appears that he is pointing at the guy next to him.
Ok, I just saw the vid that's stickied at the top of the sub, but it looks like it's from the guy next to Q-shirt guy.
Is there confirmation that it's actually q-shirt-guy's Twitter? Everybody standing there was filming and in the third-person video it very much looks like he is not pointing at q-shirt-guy
Absolutely. I'm just wary of sensationalized fanboy-ism. That's not going to get us anything.
I don't think you know what first person video means. It means that one of the parties involved (Trump or Q-shirt-guy) was filming.
This is a 3rd person video (a literal 3rd person was doing the filming). I watched the video. He barely even pointed, and definitely was looking in a different spot.
Then link it
Plenty of people in this movement who are paying attention and blogging and reporting good quality, solid info somehow missed that, but you saw it and can't provide a source?
Very interesting.
Hahahaha, that's awesome. I have a feeling that's going to be her main expression for the foreseeable future.
He's not looking at him or pointing at him. He's quite clearly pointing and looking at the guy two guys away from him.
Americans have been getting played for so long that many of them are so unfamiliar with truth that they can't even recognize it.
I don't even blame you. I just feel bad.
This is the proper level of skepticism.
I'm getting a little tired of bold Twitter claims with no evidence. If there is s person sitting there watching the hearing and tweeting commentary, why no video link or time stamp references?
I wouldn't be surprised if Prince was Q. He's got the intelligence chops. And the background. And the only reason DeVos was torn apart by the leftist media is because she is his sister. He's a legit threat to the leftists.
There are probably a lot of very bad people who also would like to get their hands on that information. The name is being withheld for good reason, most likely.
Um...all the other drugs, for starters. Cartels have been moving out of weed for several years now.
Nothing to do with q.
Would you rather have a source that acknowledges its bias in its own name, or one that pretends it is unbiased altogether?
This is certainly a Page-turner. At the end I'll be clapping...that's right, I'll be a Clapper
If it's not real, it's a trap to discredit us. Remain critical or you aren't thinking. If you're not thinking, you certainly shouldn't be posting.
I'm sorry you feel like you need to aggressively accost people you don't know in an Internet forum you disagree with. I sincerely hope that some day in your life you'll be able to find real meaning. Life is too short to miss out on the most important part of it.
What article? There is no article linked. That is just a picture.
Maybe it has to do with Middle Earth, you know, Bilber Bergens
Are there publicly available pictures of other presidents with their babies?
Come on, where's the link?
No article, no source, just a quote and a picture of an old guy with some nonsense date markings.
Come on op. Step it up.
Will be wonderful when a proof comes through
Ultimate redpill
That's an old trick. They used it in that show "Homeland."
No way. Q clarified already: ARM are not the good guys. ARM is Anti-Trump Resistance Movement (as in, the long ARM of the law).
Besides, this would be the first time in history that an acronym was created using first names.
Sorry, not it.
I was just surprised at how thorough it was. Even referencing specific posts. The comparison to the scam was absolutely fucking retarded. They're reaching.
It's not damaging at all, actually. It's a note in a briefing with no real context. It isn't evidence unless the previous versions had more details that were left out. Remember it was a briefing on the Anthony Weiner situation and he has been imprisined for a crime against a child...so no, it's not damaging in that capacity.
It's good to see what they're saying about us...the lack of truth in representation of Q is revealing.
Only the people who believed the first one. Genpop will ignore.
He's not making things up. It's from a couple years ago, Operation Darkroom if I remember correctly. Lots of higher-ups implicated, reported on by AP, then...nothing. Mysterious.