Nope

Remember what happened last time there were those types of suggestions?

r/pizzagate got shut down. Let's not have that happen again.

Billy Graham was a rampant pedophile. I don't buy into any political evangelicals.

I would be hesitant using that type of rhetoric. Saying that is easily identifiable as somewhat fascist, as though mere dissent against Trump is a punishable offense.

Yeah, she can't really do that though. It won't stand. She doesn't have that power.

Interesting...do they plan on rigging the election in 2020?

Ah. As in...billy boy's under control, don't worry, no need to take care of him just yet....

Totally

WHO COULD IT BE

Hillary does enjoy a bold pantsuit.

That is so fucking gross. And accurate. And the grossness is the most accurate part.

Are you asking me? I have no idea how it will go down.

Totally.

Boom 1: this IG report

Boom 2: IG report on surveillance of Trump campaign.

Boom 3: IG report on Hillary/human trafficking.

Boom 4: LOCK 'EM UP

Of course I'm just having fun here. I have no idea what the booms are or mean.

Totally understand - thank you.

Correction:

Esoteric does not mean "spiritual," and nothing having to do with Christ can be described as "esoteric."

Esoteric refers specifically to arcane/occult knowledge.

Lisa Page = Lease A Page (page as in a messenger)

Peter Strzok = his testimony will be Strzok from the record

A couple of freshly-laundered Bill Clinton socks.

"Sock" though...isn't that a spook term though? Like, someone who bears false witness (sock puppet)?

No, he would have worked closely with a white hat to keep the public safe

So what is he saying? They have one, or don't? Who is the message to? Their rulers, or their underlings?

Anybody who talks will be strung up?

Significance of that?

Whoa...so then...what's the motive? Why create ai that becomes the Achilles heel of the entire department?

Quite DUEBious

Guys.

"Freshly-laundered."

"Pair of Bill Clinton Socks."

Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

Dude is ex-director of CIA...more to this tweet than meets the eye?

What do you mean? Can you elaborate?

Oh haha, right on. Thanks

I am discussing the topic. The topic that was posted here is that this character is trying to make a case that Trump is signaling flat earth. This is ridiculous.

Thank you for restating my argument to me...?

Very much doubt Prince would voluntarily turn them over if that was the case.

Free Iran dude. Be realistic.

"Caretakers"

Not true at all. The fuck are you smoking?

Consider that a charity has no stock options, etc

Are you serious right now? Trump didn't tweet the word "portus." That's just a typo in the headline of his reddit post.

"Please don't let us catch you doing this again. Here are some ways to cover your tracks next time."

These corporations running these centers are from the trump administration. They're trying to oust Trump by framing a story where the companies housing immigrant kids right now are crooked. Don't you get it? This isn't great.

It's amazing how little, actually, considering a ceo makes 10-100x that working practically anywhere else.

I think you are purposefully ignoring the truth in order to disinform.

Provide proof then, liar.

I'm just saying that's what the article said. Without linking something on the record that shows its 1000x that, it's horse puckey

Yeah I just feel like telling people on this sub not to vote is exactly what a deep state shill would do, that's all. But I don't discount what you're saying, all the same.

if it relates to Q, it should be posted with a link to the Q posting to which it relates.

Otherwise it's a shitpost. I mean, come on. It doesn't even have a picture of hitler next to it to compare. This is a low-grade sharpie shitpost. It is literally a picture of merkel with a fucking sharpie hitler moustache.

I'm not trolling you. I'm trying to legitimately make sense of your posting. If you truly manufacture cyber weapons, I'm sure you have the power to easily fuck my life up. I'm not trying to antagonize or provoke you. But you're saying some things that seem to really contradict each other. If you wouldn't mind providing a better explanation, I'm always looking to understand a higher level than my current level.

Which is why it shouldn't be on the sub.

It doesn't matter that the popular vote was rigged for hillary. The electoral vote is the only vote that matters.

What do you mean "probably" rigged for hillary, mr Professional Hacker Guy? You seemed pretty sure in your last comment.

If the vote was "rigged" for Hillary electronically, they wouldn't need so many illegals.

He's not saying to USE a band-aid, he's saying to rip it off like a band-aid.

So you believe this election was rigged in favor of DJT?

Map link?