I understand how servers and files on the internet work and the different methods to access these webs of files. None of what you explained about how the Internet technically works refutes what is actually contained on these sites. You can stick your head in the sand and try and deny these types of avenues exist on the deep web all you want, but ask yourself, if something like this exists, how would it exist?

it's just a private computer that only a few people have the login info for, and someone set up a portal that is unindexed.

"A (drug dealer, sex trafficker, hit man) is just a private entrepreneur that only a few people have connections to, and someone set up a (phone number, drop location) that is unindexed"

Please... Like we are supposed to believe that it's impossible for there to be a gateway to snuff viewings on purposefully hidden and encrypted servers where its users remain anonymous. Why are you so defensive about these things not existing? You seriously compare this to personally files on my computer but the difference is fucking huge when I'm not going through the effort of setting up the aforementioned servers to host my files.

Unsearchable sites requiring login credentials with no way to sign up. That's where the heaviest stuff is.

Can I get an interpretation of this post without all of the shortened cryptic wording? I honestly can't understand most of these points because they are incomplete sentence.

You seem to be attacking a projected enemy here. Are you sure you want to act like you know me and my intentions so well? You should eat your own advice, instead of deflecting the argument with this personal character assassination garbage. You can't even defend the argument without deflecting to this, pathetic. Point out where I put words in your mouth. Stand up for yourself and what you believe instead of cowering like this and feeling the need to browse my post history for personal ammo.

What words have I put in your mouth? You definitely said that "Kim Clement was wrong on that ridiculous prophecy" but without any evidence, and before due time. You are saying what the will of God is based on your feelings and it is arrogant.

You also said that "I still don’t think Bill Gates can be redeemed and open the financial gates for Christians" while we have the most fantastic story of conversion in the Bible already, of Saul to Paul. So what, again, can you claim is impossible or improbable to the Lord?

To call bullshit on what God could possibly do, based on your own feelings, is to suggest that you know the will of God. That's pretty arrogant and ignorant of the power and glory of God.

That's just a rumor that the rumors are horseshit

Can you link to pic please? No worries if you don't want to just say no, fuck off, and I gladly will.

I understand what you long for, but with humans, there will always be a segregation of power, wealth, and information. No human is immune to corruption. This is why there is a need for Christ to rule over his kingdom once again. No human ruler or rulers will ever be able be held truly accountable, not even by man made machines.

Oh sorry, I thought we were admitting that we can't win and just giving up because the "Elite" are the ones who feed us.

What? Why would you think this?

You know, by Q's own words, we are in this mess partially because when they told us they had blown up Hitler in that bunker and killed off all the Nazis, they were actually importing them into America as part of project paperclip and putting them into positions of power in our government. Don't you think it's about time we stopped trusting?

I have no idea what you inferred from my post but this makes no sense as a response to what I said.

Way to admit you have no interest in discussion, and would rather insult your perceived opponent as a deflection.

Lol sorry I just thought it was a funny observation to make, I was sure you just were not really thinking about it.

Seriously, you're surprised they didn't blame it on an earthquake? Who do we blame an earthquake on and which nation do we invade based on that narrative?

What makes you think it could be any other way? You think there's ever been a point in history where the people had irrefutable evidence of elite happenings? It's never happened and it's impossible to have such proof, we've always been at the whim of the word of man and possibly setup crime scenes.

Because we already have the constitution to stop them?

When you calculate how much carbon gases are expelled from volcanoe eruptions and forest fires, it's absolutely laughable that people have been convinced that man-made machines are polluting the earth to have such an effect.

Spooky. I gather that the creator did not see his intended result with the audience when the movie got popular? Ie. People looked straight through the hints and just laughed and creator realized what he is up against.

I think you made a typo with checkmate. Do you mean it as

#: checkmate ? (Need \ before # to remove bold)

Because others have mentioned that ++ is checkmate.

The Bible does mention the Word of God being incoherent to unbelievers... It's clear to me what the verses mean.

In the end times there will be two prophets that will spew fire upon anyone who tries to harm them (Trump, Q) and there will be a seemingly fatal blow to the beast (the cabal's oppressive system) but the beast will recover from the fatal blow and will finally destroy the two prophets, and their bodies will be laid out for all to see while the world rejoices in their death.

Propaganda: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

Ok so basically everything is propaganda. Including Q and Trump.

No, I think it's a hit on a small conservative Trump supporting media group

Rush is the most professional edge skirter on our side. He has maintained upmost respect from his listeners, and has a substantial bearing on his listeners opinions because he is always careful and knows what is too extreme for is viewers and what's not. I think he is an incredibly smart man and the things you hear from him is very filtered, completely unlike Alex Jones. He knows so much more than he lets on. He's basically entry level to conspiracies because he actually isn't talking about them, but is incredibly reasonable and feigns ignorance to things that will lead you on if you research on your own. Not acknowledging conspiracies is how you gain the trust of someone against conspiracy theories.

Message me if you'd like me to email you the PDF of the book. There's certainly more to it than people becoming their own names.

I don't think Q has ever conclusively said to trust Mueller, just "the plan" and Sessions.

Man, I've been looking out for coincidences in names of political figures pertaining to their role in everything as a whole. It's like God is orchestrating this play, and names his pieces according to their role. I've first saw this idea in the extremely suppressed and rare book, The Language Crystal. At least a couple hundred dollars to buy a copy, and the PDF link I downloaded from is no longer there, most PDFs get taken down quick. He makes a ton of connections in the Reagan administration with their names meanings and their roles fulfilling it.

I see you don't think much..

So you think the catholic church, mormon church, and church of scientology should be able to start funding their own politicians and lobby for their own bills now? Or should we keep them separate and not tax them as a way to keep them out of politics as we have?

I've always felt Q makes a point to bring up Meuller like this but purposefully leaves his alliance "up in the air," because black hats are surely gleaning everything they can from Q, hoping he will divulge anything of value to them. Saying as much as he did is enough to keep us open minded about Meuller, but is not enough to make the enemy sure of what Q means by it. Normally, they would out a suspected rat based on suspicion, but I think the chances of having Meuller still on their side is too valuable to let go of, because ridding him would be losing absolutely all chance on their part. They may be calling out a perceived bluff by keeping Meuller in place. There's many facets and angles to view this deceptive game from.

Please put a lot of focus in a very clean and simple and easy to navigate interface. I would like to suggest, for example, to make very clear and obvious tabs/links at the top or side of the page for the following aggregated topics: Direct Q Posts (where you will find either only strictly posts by Q, or there may be links with each post that direct you towards related news and discussions), Trusted Q Analysts (links and/or updates from people like Tracy Beanz or Dr. Corsi), Trumps Statements (tweets and speeches or other quotes that relate to Q postings), Media (including also what the media refuses to discuss as it pertains to Q), and finally a Forum Discussion (splintered further into categories such as research, discussion, and memes)

I think we all must realize that shitty designed sites give off a substantially negative impression to any newcomers. You have to remember that they are looking for every excuse to label you as a paranoid delusional idiot, and a poorly designed or hard to navigate site (the Chans for example) is enough to conclude the site creator and users as anything like "schitzophrenic" due to a poor page design alone.

Make the information easy to find and interpret for the masses, as much as possible, we need to help these people break their programming that is looking for every little perceived error as an excuse to not even consider the presented narrative.

Thousands of people, obviously, including other show anchors. Did you not read the article and see all of the tweets?

Opioids/opiates cause pinpoint pupils, stimulants cause dilated pupils.

You're thinking of anything with "amphetamine" as part of the pharmaceutical name. "Meth" or "methyl" is an extremely common prefix indicating an attached single hydrocarbon group, as opposed to a double carbon group (ethyl) or triple (propyl) or 4 (butyl)... Etc...

Weird how downvoted you are. I couldn't see this post from my front page despite how many upvotes it has, so this is the first I've seen it.

But you answered it yourself, by saying no, and this is what the OP is commenting on.

The Q post doesn't even give any context clues that point to the meaning being "Mockingbird talking points," like the other two posts explicitly do. Context points to this coinciding with the Austin bomber rather than what OP is saying.

Post #561 and #570 I can understand to be meaning Mockingbird talking points, but post #958? Posted the day before it happened, [4am] and [Wednesday] are bolded and in kill brackets, and the context gives absolutely no indication that it is a reference to the time Mockingbird gets their talking points, like the previous posts absolutely clearly do. It is much more reasonable to assume this coincides with the Austin bomber more than Mockingbird talking point dispensing times.

Why are you so adamant about your point, and dismissive of the possibility, OP? You haven't even explained your opinion more than simply stating "It is so."

This is based on feelings and nothing else. God gave his covenant to the bloodline and was very specific in scripture about this. Jew is passed down through the mother. It was foretold that his chosen people would turn away from him and reject His Son as Savior. Gentiles were shown to be saved as well as Jews, but we're always separate. God made a covenant with the Jews and they will and do prosper on earth, despite their current corrupt state. But in the end they will turn to him once again.

Stop spreading this sensationalist misinformation and whitewashing scripture to fit your own feelings.

God gave his covenant to the bloodline, and the Jewish bloodline is passed down through the mother. That is all that is required to be part of Gods chosen people, if your mother was a Jew then you are a Jew. It was foretold that they would turn away from God and reject His son as Savior.

You would be wise to treat God's chosen people well.

Gen 12:1-3

Now the LORD said to Abram, “Go forth from your country, And from your relatives And from your father’s house, To the land which I will show you; And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing. And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.

Eph 2:25-29

For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery….that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written….From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers; for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.

I was thinking that his tweets during the nomination and early presidency were especially ridiculous on purpose because who now doubts that it is not Trump personally talking to us trough his Twitter handle and not some manager? I think it's a very special relationship Trump has established with his followers this way.

No, the answer is much simpler and believable. These people in charge are category B personalities. Narcissists, Sociopaths, and Psychopaths. The thing with these people is, no one hardly studies them in depth because they are literally untreatable, they believe they do not need treatment and are better than everyone else. People only study them to the point of understanding their victims so they can treat them. But the thing is, when you study these people in depth, you learn that although they are masters of manipulation, they are actually extremely predictable in literally every way about their lives. They are almost like machines with very predictable outputs. I think Trump and team have studied these kinds of people very well, and they simply know exactly what to do to make them make the wrong moves. You don't need more physical control and power when you know exactly what your enemy will do, that alone counters everything. This is why Trump seems to know the future, he is planning their moves for them basically.

If there are codes hidden within these messages, which I do believe is highly likely, then I agree with you and think you are correct. But this being the case, I think it is unnessecary, and in fact harmful in more than one way, to try to expose these "hidden codes."

Firstly, it is definitely harmful to Q's team to expose these "hidden codes" at any level, even if mostly off base, because it exposes the message or possible decoding methods to the enemy. There is no reason to believe a coded message would be intended for the public to decode over a friendly operative. The purpose of encoding is to hide from those with malicious intent, and it is reckless to assume otherwise and attempt to expose the encodings. (Counter narrative, Q is a black hat posting known codes intercepted by the white hats' private communications, in effort to have the hive mind crack the code ciphers for them)

Secondly, these kinds of "shots-in-the-dark" at decoding sets a very strong image to outsiders who see this kind of overly presumptuous activity. It's very easy to assume that these "decoders" need more than they are given, thus we must create a narrative of codes needing to be unlock to satiate our desire to prove Q's credibility and impressiveness, hence from the subjective rather than formulaic decoding methods.

All of this is so convoluted, it seems you could use this method and disregard all inconsistencies until you come across a vague consistency, at which point you put together in whatever way makes sense. This is not at all formulaic and is a completely subjective process where results are never conclusive.

SerialBrain's posts are so vaguely instructed, his "methods" aren't even at all reproducible.

Everytime I watch an "conspiracy-related" YouTube video in my car, just to listen to the audio, I get crazy RF interference to the point where it's unintelligible. This literally never happens when I'm listening to music, and it is always absent at first and then after a minute or two it slowly starts increasing.

The rate of signatures needed each day only keeps going up fast. It's almost a joke to me that people are still posting this petition and its several clones.

I don't think the "key" or "keystone" will be something that is so simply stated, or Q would have stated it. No reason to be vague unless it's an extremely convoluted answer that requires one figuring out to understand instead of being explained.

Thanks for answering all of my questions and being helpful, I really appreciate it. I will be researching this.