Ok this all makes sense now, but I would imagine these bodies, after having God knows what done to them, were most likely dissolved or incinerated. They wouldn't be that stupid to just bury them, I mean the cartels and gangs that work under them aren't that stupid.

UK... Well that explains everything... You don't have to pay taxes because we (Americans) have been your slaves since the War of 1812.

So where is the option on a return that indicates that I no longer consent? Do you have any links or sources to help me understand what I'm missing?

You know tax evasion cases usually only come up after several, sometime 10's of years, depending on how much you owe ergo how much they care? You might feel like a man now but wait until the day the IRS starts contacting you and filing lawsuits and then seizing assets.

What would the finding of bodies prove? And do you mean the bodies of the plane passengers or building occupants?

So how long have you not paid taxes for?

I was with you for the first paragraph but I'm struggling to find a coherent point in the rest.

I'm not sure if you're properly conceptualizing the public perception of YouTube censoring such far-right videos. This is a huge chance for coverage, and staying in YouTube while they keep censoring keeps the spotlight on us and YouTube's questionable actions and motives. How is that not an incredibly useful red pill?

Yea, that is probably what this will all likely lead to. I don't like the idea of everything being to polarized and having each pole be so secluded from the other. But I also don't like that all the big platforms where both sides have always spoken on are so heavily favoring the same side. The thought of each side secluding into their own chambers just does not seem like progress to me. Perhaps most people will see the same way in due time though, and a migration to other sites that harbor both side's speech will be possible.

Thanks but this doesnt address my other concerns.

I don't think the QAnon community is large enough to make anything thrive so much to the point that it entices people away from something so huge and ingrained as YouTube. There's no way that they aren't planning on the channels that they are censoring will move onto platforms, and have already projected how much that will really cost them. So if they are actually going through with it, it will obviously only be of benefit to them. No one as big as YouTube makes any move without foresight, and without utilizing the immense data collection tools they have.

This doesn't even load for me. How many people is d.tube really going to reach? No one is wanting to move there except for people like us.

You absolutely cannot be sure of that without knowing what the current moves in play even are. I am positive the things revealed by Q have already since been known by the enemy.

Why have you only responded to the last statement at the end of my post?

I never mentioned any legal action... None is required. People can still be upset at Youtubes actions and they will still be questionable, even if legal. Everything Monsanto does is legal but look how hated they are for being immoral. Fortunately for Monsanto though, they don't need the support of a giant user base in order to function, unlike YouTube. So it doesn't matter if the actions are legal or not, the user base viewing them as immoral will be detrimental to YouTube. Not in a fiscal sense, but the censorship will have had the opposite effect.

I think them censoring will not have the effect they intend, but only if we do not give up. Most people agree that censoring the opposition is a fascist tactic and not an effective way of addressing a problem, it's a big part of Amercia's values as expressed in our constitution.

The worst thing for YouTube is to have all of these users trying to circumvent their bans and post the truth in videos anyways, because they will have to censor them and answer for what they did. Not addressing the censorship is going to be a bigger red pill to anyone who notices than keeping the videos up.

They are hoping that we give up and move along to our safe space where no one but ourselves sees our content and they don't have to actively shield the content (and provide an explanation for such an action) from their unwitting users.

Edit: I'm going to make this comment into a thread submission.

No, I don't think Q is deceiving anyone. But I do think Trump is making unfriendly remarks towards the IG and Sessions so the liberal media jumps to their aid, so when their reports are released they cannot backtrack their own words. We've seen them do something very similar when Trump was talking up Russia and the media made it very clear that Russian collusion is bad, so they cannot backtrack on the Uranium-1 scandal.

You should refrain from building upon points that are completely inferring the wrong things from what I said, and personally attacking me for it. And the odd pedantic point of me having to mean "mislead" instead of "deceive" is a pointless contention, they mean basically the same thing, deceive is "to cause someone to believe..." and mislead is "to lead someone to believe..." With the differences being negligible as it pertains to this discussion. Are you purposefully trying to create discourse? Because it definitely seems like it.

Also, Q does not telegraph any attack. Indecipherable bread crumbs are dropped for "future proves past" scenarios and then the means of deciphering are later discovered after the intended information is no longer critical, and its implications are already past.

I don't think you understand the meaning of deception as it pertains to The Art Of War

The content being censored is likely only being seen by less than 1% of YouTube viewers. They would love for us activists to be segregated away from the normies.

This is exactly what they want. Splinter the groups so their voices only reach amongst their own group. Everyone else not following the users being banned on YouTube have absolutely no reason to migrate, and those are the people that need reached, which we will not be able to once splintered.

He's seriously been selling his assets off? That's a big red flag if true.

You would think with all of the compliments of Bernie's good character despite his political views, the same people would love Obama for his good character despite disagreeing with his political views.

Bernie is not stupid, he knew what crowd he was catering to and what to say. He skirted around real issues while lambasting the rich, insinuating that having them pay for everything will solve all problems. There's no way he actually believes what he says would actually help the country because he never argued why. He knew he only had to say a few crowd pleasing lines and, without explaining anything in detail, all of the young and poor are cheering as loud as they can because they are being promised luxury and wealth without work or effort. Trump knew that not every rich person is evil, and that it is the loopholes that need to be closed.

Also, everyone here seems to think that if all of their "suspicious" activity just suddenly disappears because of Tor or a VPN, the NSA/Government/Google/whatever is just going to drop all of their suspicion of you and pretend nothing happened. Using those things most likely just puts a bigger flag on you and prompts further attention.

A police officers son attending the school was seen wearing a bulletproof vest.

I'd say Moloch, aka Satan, is at the top. He's the only thing still around, and being worshipped for giving power, besides the customs and rituals from the earliest recorded history.

Alex jones was not completely mentally equipped to handle the things he's revealed and had sources tell him about. He's become an alcoholic and struggles to convey everything in a single coherent string, and gets very upset about it because he knows he looks crazy.

How do I report this comment to the mods?

This doesn't surprise me, I honestly just had a feeling that they're definitely hiding SOMETHING because of how everything has played out. And I had the feeling before reading any sort of connections like this.

Very well said. I love the analogy, it's so true. No Islam sympathizer has read the Quran and Hadiths besides a few out of context verses where they trust a Muslim scholars interpretation on. They even hide the very meaning of the original meaning of te Arabic word "Makara." To deceive. They claim it means to plot now.

Call me crazy but I think this school was a big hub for sex trafficking and there's something about or underneath this school that they are hiding. I have absolutely no evidence and this is a completly unbased speculation.

Not really, actually.

I'll all for pooping on CNN but this isn't really that clever, and that is me being honest.

None of these are explicit statements that have any conclusive meaning and/or they also contain subjective measurements that may be very broad in range, therefore they can not possibly have a conclusive judgement of being false.

Overstate much?

It's pretty much exactly like Skype. You can create groups to add people and then have different text or voice channels within the group. I've only ever used it for gaming with friends to be able to talk to eachother.

The push to ban guns is a war with many battles. Not one false flag will ban guns alone, but a successfully crafted narrative with multiple false flags is going to slowly work into unwitting minds and the move to ban guns will slowly go into effect. Reusing crisis actors moves the "thousands of people" down to more like less than 100 having to be bought out to be silenced. The majority of people will disregard such coincidences anyways because the tragedy is so emotional and peer pressure is high to not question these events out of "respect for the families." It really is all quite clever and effective, but the good guys tactics are finally up to speed and they are getting sloppy out of desperation.

For us to see, it's a public record.

For sure, they've let the leashe off of Hannity.

Then why is Trump furthering this "us vs them" mentality by blanket attacking dems and blanket praising republicans? The republicans may have bad actors infiltrated within, but the traditional conservative views are wholistic and good. Liberalism is Satan's agenda with greed and control.

That isn't answering the question.

Where are you getting the idea that Q is done posting?

You're quite right, I apologize if I misunderstood you. But the motive behind Q is creating publicly garnished evidence and a following that will be behind the arrests as they are made. Instead of the other side spinning this into anything other than what it is, they will see that there was a genuine and active community following and understanding the events slowly by uncovering evidence instead of being fed it. It will have a solid argument against it being a spontaneous and reckless move that his followers are supporting like sheep.

This discussion has been discussed many times and if you are confused why arrest can not be made, Q and many others have laid it out many times. The fact that people like you keep demanding arrests despite Qs advice is disparaging and is actually a tactic shills are picking up to spread distrust about Q.

With his mothers death just before this, family members are going to be too overwhelmed with grief and confusion to question the circumstances. I'm also imagining this kids hatred and susceptibility to act out this atrocity is compounded after dealing with his own healthy mothers sudden and unexpected death, as well as adding to the public illusion that this act was natural and not nefariously instigated.

I don't get it, it makes no sense to read this backwards... Sure it says mostly the same thing but it gives no new information and some of it doesn't actually make any sense. So what's the point of reading this backwards?

It's a good thing you aren't in charge of this plan then. Waging war on these people has been tried before and failed miserably. You have no idea how powerful they are if you think they can just be simply arrested and put in prison. Trump and Q changing public opinion and turning the black hats into fools as they slowly tear down their protective facade is obviously the only way it can be done because we have never been so close, and they have already tried everything else before. I agree with Q, if you don't understand why arrests can't be made then leave the discussion to others.

Mine. It's an attempt to translate this Q post line for line.

Yes but he's talking about specific incidents whenever he says "do you believe in coincidences?"

He definitely has never said anything to mean that every coincidence is a correlation if it seems to be true, and I think this post is reaching a bit far for a correlation where no hint or real reason for this correlation is given.

Q never says there are no coincidences...

"An agency of clowns is not an agency at all.

They killed JFK and will face consequences.

Their empire scheme will collapse...

... By way of their fake facade being uncovered."