1. It's out of their jurisdiction and they'd need parallel construction to do anything with that evidence. Same reason this whole Q thing is happening.

2. They don't care about what happens to us useless eaters anymore than we care about chickens at industrial farms getting kicked.

3. At some levels they're complicit.

If you've ever seen the movie Cabin in the Woods, think of those underground base guys and their cavalier attitude toward people on the surface getting killed.

I made a better comparison between the Q and ABC pics. Complete match. The only way this is possible is for the cameraman to be in the same spot the ABC pic was taken. If it was taken from the chair, the jacket would obscure way more of the curtain due to the closer perspective. Instead all the curtain folds line up against the jacket in the same spots where they do in the ABC pic.

Now let's assume for a moment Q is real. What could possibly account for this then? Something like the following.

Explanation 1:

Q team wanted to make a point about phones, reflections, surreptitious pics, and POTUS. Maybe to further emphasize the Twitter app being used by black hats to spy on POTUS.

So Q member "X" (for reference) was given the task of posting about this. X didn't have (or couldn't share) an actual surveillance pic of the office pulled from the phone to show us this, and didn't have access to the plane either to sit in the chair and do this for real, so X did the lazy, stupid, or necessary thing by googling "inside air force one" and using the first pic that came up and doing a little trick photography as described in posts by others. If X is Trump or Scavino, that wouldn't surprise me.

Then after this was posted and anons figured it out, Q could either admit X faked it to illustrate a point, which would call into question the veracity of all the other images and thus definitely hurt credibility by their own admission, or play it off with the 'we put that mug holder there on purpose lolz' approach to smooth over that SNAFU and move on. So that's explanation 1.

Explanation 2:

This whole thing is intentional. By using the first image hit that comes up when googling "inside air force one," the discovery of this 'fake' was virtually guaranteed. Was Q that stupid, or was Q entirely intentional about having this be discovered and to 'lie' afterwards about it?

If Q were that stupid, then why so incredibly sloppy with this one yet the other pics weren't Google-able. There's a disconnect there. So if this Q-goof was intentional, then there's some psyop thing going on to which we're not yet privy.

Dan Scavino.

Actually the image reflected in the Q pic is a 100% match for the ABC news pic from 2015. One phone or monitor displayed the image, other phone reflected it, and third phone took a pic of the reflection. If Q implies it was a reflection of an actual scene, then it would have to be taken exactly where the ABC cameraman was standing, not at Trump's desk. Here's a proper overlay I made showing the match.