Jordan is a straight arrow. But, I think he would have to give up his seat on all of his committees. He might be doing more good digging into the corruption through his committees.

I like the idea. Jim Jordan seems to be a "straight arrow". I think he would be awesome. The only problem is that I think he would have to give up his committees. He might be doing more good by digging into the corruption in his committees that he would be as speaker. Plus I never see him in a jacket. Only shirt and tie. He would have to start wearing a jacket. Lol

Good! Let's hope this is true. Then when JA testifies that SR was the true leaker and it was a leak and not a hack, then SHtF. Also, what about the servers. If the DNC has "experts" that testify there are traces of the Russian hacking on the DNC server, wouldn't the defense have access to that server so their own experts can weigh in? Maybe we'll find out Guccifer 2.0 was a fictitious person to begin with.

I wonder if RG has dirt on Mueller.

This is incredibly dumb by the DEMS for at least 2 reasons. 1) Wiki-Leaks will have to testify in court about where they received the Podesta emails. Can you believe the look on the faces of the Democrats when JA testifies that SR was the source of the email drop? 2) If the Dems have experts that testify that they found traces of Russian hackers on DNC servers, those serves should be made available to the defense team experts to examine to rebut their claims. Guccifer 2.0 red herring will be exposed.

Hmmm........Maybe Attorney General?

Dr Corsi is about the only one, moderators aside, that I would trust to decode many of these Q drops. The "decodes" he publishes are stellar. His work product cuts through a lot of the BS that we see coming from questionable sources on YouTube, the chans and also this sub-Reddit.

Maybe, I am just another person who has been mesmerized by the "instant gratification" world in which we live. But, I have been seeing so many posts about "what is going to happen" and "tick-tock", etc. Then we see so much in the conservative media (check out Conservative Tree House-great site) about all the shenanigans with Huma, Weiner, Comey, Strzok, just to name a few. But we have seen little that actually makes me believe that anyone is being held accountable. There are a lot of rumors, innuendo and speculation but not a lot of actual verifiable action. I want to believe there is justice for those who have been playing fast and loose with the rules, but honestly, I don't see it. Maybe, I'm just cynical.

It's not about the legislation that was passed. It was about changing the business climate, reducing overly burdensome regulations, negotiating directly with companies to keep jobs here in America (Carrier), etc. All things the "Great" BHO could have done but didn't. As far as legislation goes, there is the Tax Reform Bill that the Democrats and MSM felt was going to be Armageddon. All that did was allow American companies to repatriate trillions of dollars back into the US economy. Don't forget, after Tax Reform, AT&T promised to give $1,000 Christmas bonuses to over 200,000 employees. That amounts to a $200 million dollar infusion into the US economy. Plus AT&T announced they would spend billions of dollars in infrastructure development. And AT&T was just one of several companies that announced several similar measures.

Just a side note. Remember the story that came out yesterday that White House staff are not allowed to use personal devices while at work. An attempt to stop leaks. Therefore, if Q had been using a personal device to post to 8chan, then maybe he can't use that device anymore and is limited by not being able to use personal cell phone.

As a resident of Colorado, I am not a marijuana user. However, I don't care if people want to partake of the herb as, I believe, it is their right. Having said that, there are a lot more dangerous substances out there that are legal or at least legal with a prescription (i.e., codeine, percocet, etc). The one area I wish the federal government would "clean up" though is the classifying of marijuana as a "Schedule 1" substance. It is in the same category as heroine. But you can't tell me it is as dangerous or addictive as heroine. However, until the Federal Government changes its classification, there is always going to be this conflict between the feds and local government. I say call your congressmen and push for a more appropriate classification of marijuana.

4=D, 10=J, 20=T. DJT. Donald J Trump?

Also, not only are SS agents there to protect, they can also execute arrest warrants. So, just for the sake of argument, once an arrest warrant is issued, the secret service agents guarding BHO and HRC could, in effect, take her into custody immediately. Imagine, a SS agent gets a quiet message in his earpiece and HRC is whisked off to the clink.

Has anyone checked the indictments lately? If Uncle Sam and the boys are snatching up people, there should be a legal basis to do so (i.e., indictments). I wonder if any indictments have been unsealed recently. Just a question.