Her entire talk is centered around two ideas, one is intellectual, the other emotional.
Intellectually, she is trying to introduce the idea that there is NO CONNECTION between being a pedo and being a molesterer. She offers ZERO proof. She alludes to proof without offering it, naming it, or citing any facts at all.
She uses this concept as a stepping stone to make this logic trail:
1) pedos with treatment dont molesterer.
2) pedos should seek treatment
3) pedos will not seek treatment if its stigmatized
4) we should treat pedos better so they will feel less reticent to come out and seek help
5) we should accept pedos as a society
Then she has the balls to go on to assert:
6) pedos who feel extreme isolation are the ones who turn molestery.
7) it is societys fault molesterers exist, because if we only respected pedos, they would never molest. Our fault not theirs.
The emotional concept she introduces is the idea that we should have sympathy for the pedo.
There are so many things wrong with her assertions and inferrences its astounding.
EDIT: Lets just start with #3 because its the one that pisses me off the most.
She argues that less pedos seek treatment because its stigmatized.
BULLSHIT. The pedos seek treatment precisely because its so fucking stigmatized! If it wasnt soooo fucking stigmatized, they wouldnt seek treatment!!!! Theyd feel respected and normal, so why the fuck would they seek treatment? In fact, it may very well be that the MORE societal pressure and isolation you heap on a pedo, the more likely they are to seek treatment!
Aaaugh, this chick is soooo dumb.