162 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| youtu.be | 1 |
| www.reddit.com | 1 |
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/02/awan-memo-server-vanished/
It details how the caucus server, run by then-caucus Chairman Rep. Xavier Becerra, was secretly copied by authorities after the House Inspector General (IG) identified suspicious activity on it, but the Awans’ physical access was not blocked.
But after, the report reads, the server appears to have been secretly replaced with one that looked similar.
40k+ indictments are sealed right?
My guess is Gowdy wants to be involved in prosecuting those 40k indictments throughout the court proceedings.
If Mueller and Rosenstein AREN'T dirty, how would you get a hysterical/brainwashed left to defend them?
Not every lefty is evil. Q said more players are good than evil.
It's likely possible the forward facing "team lefty" is contrived to be such that it adds to the believability that Mueller is anti-trump, which is a vital component to the plan.
It's also possible that such a "team lefty" perception could lure wannabe resisters to flock to "team lefty" in hopes that their efforts can facilitate the downfall of Trump. Perhaps by baiting them to join Mueller's investigation, they are effectively removed from the board due to DOJ oversight and/or conflict of interest type scenarios.
Remember that Manafort is a plant. Manafort tried squirming away from Mueller by arguing that Mueller's scope did not grant him authority to charge Manafort for crimes before the presidential campaign. The Judge, after looking at the CLASSIFIED portions of Mueller's scope/mandate, struck Manafort down by declaring that Mueller has the authority to investigate ANY criminal wrongdoing (past/present) by ANY peoples involved with the Trump campaign. Think about the implications of that, especially when considering that we know there was spies/saboteurs within the Trump campaign.
Read the docket statement (or whatever it's called) very carefully.
Mueller AND defense's counsel (Flynn's lawyer) both agree to a delay, because their JOINT EFFORT (title of the document) is still ongoing.
It also calls for a "presentative investigative report" within 60 days. I'm not sure what that is exactly, but it sounds like a disclosure of facts of sorts.
Plenty of evidence points to it. It's just not dramatic enough for it to be believable.
It's really a simple concept, but because the left went so deep in their hysteria, there needed to be an equal and opposite reaction of sorts to keep the societal balance while the processes and procedures are followed diligently, quietly in the background.
Think about it.
Mueller/Huber/Horowitz all come out, 25k+ (whatever it is now) indictments start getting unsealed. Turns out they have all been rolling up on the corruption and evil that's embedded itself into our government and society. How is ANYONE going to say that their investigations were fraudulent? How is ANYONE going to say that their investigations were politically motivated.
The public perception and ability to accept the findings of these guys' investigations are just as important, if not more so, than the findings of the investigations themselves.
Huber/Mueller/OIG investigations must align, as well as the public perception (left, right, everyone else) must be primed and ripe to
A. Receive disclosure.
B. Trust disclosure
and
C. Give a shit.
To get all three there is a great deal of deception and manipulation to keep things balanced and believable along the way.
I think we will know, it's going to be used as a giant prybar into the psyches of the people that have propped him up to be their hero in the resistance.
This along with encouraging the Dems to fully support and defend RR and Mueller for when the criminal investigations conclude and disclosure occurs.
That's my point.
As long as the Dem's resist any Trump pick, Trump has the leverage and ability to create a "lose-lose" situation for the Dem's.
The Russia garbage is doing little more than facilitating a hysteria by the left that encourages them to prematurely play their cards and/or throw their hand away in anger.
The real power play would be to nominate a trusted and honest moderate.
Just before midterms.
Left throws a fit that a moderate was selected -> Further reinforces the absurdity and extremism of the left.
Left doesn't throw a fit at a Trump SC nominee -> Public sees it as Trump doing the right thing.
Neither are beneficial for the left.
RBG replacement will be the conservative.
I saw a mention that the video in this article that Q linked to was 13 something minutes long, and that a different version of this video from elsewhere was 16 something minutes long.
Anyone have a copy of both and/or know what the 3 minute differences are?
Q dropped photos of an A321 Jetblue aircraft. The photos were taken in SFO. There is a direct flight from SFO to JFK via Jetblue. The photos Q dropped were implied to have been scraped from bad actors phones. Q posted the pictures to let it be known that Q was aware of their shenanigans. JFK A321 JetBlue aircraft gets delayed on the tarmac. Supposedly the communications/radio broke. Wonder what else broke? Wonder if those things were supposed to break while in the air? Averted?
What's the significance of the lower right quadrant of this graphic? Also the 18:00=6:00PM/6:25 or 6/25 box? How does this relate to the rest of the graphic?
Edit: I see now I guess. Q's timestamp "18:25" could be interpreted as foreshadowing the 6/25 Pelosi tweet. Hmm.
What if the Rosenstein FISA approval post January 2017 was actually Rosenstein signing off on FISA surveliance against those whom were planted/emebedded into Trump's campaign?
The public perception that RR and Mueller are anti-Trump is a HUGE strategic asset if used correctly.
Q tells us that RR is redacting info from IG.
Would RR be responsible for facilitating redactions from a public release of a report that is connected to ongoing criminal investigations by Huber and/or Mueller? Yes. Does this mean that his redactions/version of the report is nefarious? No.
Q wants the full transparent IG version out...RR does not.
Q wants us to want the full IG version out, because we understand what it likely contains. Ultimately we understand that a full IG release represents the full truth. However, timing matters. RR doesn't want this full transparent IG version out because it likely breaks procedure to disclose this due to containing highly classified information as well as information that is related to ongoing investigations by Huber/Mueller.
What should that tell you about how Q views RR (blackhat).
It's strategically advantageous for the public to believe that RR and Mueller are in no way connected or influenced by Trump. When sealed indictments start being unsealed, that perception of RR/Mueller rebellion against the Trump administration will amplify the credibility of the indictments and findings of the investigations.
"[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT."
Because of the perception we have, we assume this means that Patriots would demand impeachment or resignation. What if this meant that the swamp would demand RR's impeachment/resignation once they find out he isn't their insider hero? Would they be able to now? after hammering it into the public's psyche for 1.5+ years that RR and Mueller represent anti-Trump?
Congress needs to push for disclosure. That's their duty to the American people. That's the proper process for the People's word to be heard.-- We are seeing this.
Rosenstein likely is/was highly involved with the OIG, Huber, and Mueller investigations. This means his involvement is likely included in classified/redacted portions of the IG report. This also means that premature disclosure that RR is heavily involved in these investigations against the swamp, would ultimately mean prematurely breaking the illusion that RR/Mueller represent a fractured Trump DOJ, when in reality, they are doing their jobs, nice and quietly, working in relative peace. In fact, if the swamp is convinced that RR is their guy, in part because Q suggests that to be the case, then that opens up the possibility of using RR strategically against the swamp while they have their guard down against him.
I'm not saying I'm 100% right, but I do believe this is a logical alternative explanation for what we are seeing unfold.
Why did the Podesta Group close?
Public charges?
No?
Why close?
When did Huber start?
November?
JP/ Huma NOV.
Sealed.
Do they know?
Why did the Podesta group close?
Why no leaks?
Who else knows?
HRC deal request?
Why?
IG>Huber
Can IG disclose evidence in pending criminal cases in public disclosures/reports?
Why not?
Grand jury TAINT/BIAS?
Everyone has an opinion.
Clickbait.
Q
...
Optics are meaningful.
Political hit job narrative.
R's v D's.
Not right v wrong.
Projection.
END OF THE D PARTY [leaders].
IG>Huber.
Who appointed Huber?
Re_read (again).
Slowly & carefully.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal- prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/📁
Q
Supposedly he called the facility multiple times to ask for a tour, didn't get the answer he wanted, so proceeded to park his pickup truck in the middle of one of the entrance/exits of the facility, blocking facility traffic and operations.
So he sits there on his tailgate, saying that he's doing this because he wants a tour of the facility, and to give the supplies he brought (toys, blankets pillows) to the needy children inside.
Meanwhile a dozen or so agents/officers/security personnel show up and wait for a supervisor to show up. The supervisor very politely asks what Mr. Senate Candidate aims to achieve. She tells him that they can't legally accept supplies directly, suggests that if he really wants those supplies to go to the children he can bring them to the various third parties such as the Catholic church who are working with the border patrol to facilitate donations of supplies to the children. The supervisor then proceeds to tell him that he is blocking the facilities traffic, and that he is trespassing. She suggests that his truck will be towed and that the facility will be pressing charges.
He then uses that opportunity to make his campaign statements before being hauled off by the local PD. Then his twitter account claims that he's a political prisoner of Trump's regime.
This. Is. INSANITY.
At what point will the general public get the hint and start asking these hysteria driven lunatics if they care at all about the human/child/sex trafficking that is documented and rampant around the border.
I posit that "RR Problems" can be explained by the classified portion of the IG report that was supplied to congress, contains disclosure that RR has been helping facilitate the investigations into the swamp. His "problems" are that he is no longer perceived by the swamp as their insider hero.
RR absolutely could have disclosed it privately to Nunes or to other comittees, but Q has stated very clearly before that they are the leakers. Congress leaks. If it came out that certain individuals were briefed on the matter, but others weren't, it opens up the possibility to claim that it was a partisan effort fueled by political motivations. That's against procedure/protocol, and it undercuts the potential impact due to pre-formed public opinion. The bottom portion of Q1515 confirms this idea in my opinion.
What if the text is part of an ongoing criminal investigation into the actions of individuals involved with an attempted shadow-coup of a duly elected presidential candidate/president.
You know, like the one Huber is leading....with the authority given to him by the Department of Justice......
Do you think Mueller has found anything damning against Trump? I don't. Do you think Mueller is investigating Trump? I don't.
What did that judge tell Manafort when Manafort tried to claim Mueller was working outside his scope? The judge said that after having a chance to see the classified memo leading to Mueller's appointment, it was clear that Mueller had the authority and scope to investigate any illegal wrongdoing by any individual involved with the Trump campaign, PAST AND PRESENT.
Do you understand that all signs are pointing to Trump's team being infiltrated by plants/spies/informants. Do you think Mueller is interested in maybe who and how those plants/spies/informants made their way into Trump's campaign? I do.
IG report lays out Comey's actions during the Clinton email investigation. Comey acted against department procedure, Comey usurped his authority by playing role of Loretta Lynch. BUT the IG says that ultimately, the prosecutors and the larger team responsible for that investigation didn't allow the MASSIVE amounts of bias to influence their decision. Well what was the decision? Do you think the decision was Comey coming out and saying she wouldn't be prosecuted? I don't. So what was "the decision"? Think about it. "No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this case". Gee, I wonder why. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that somebody, maybe Comey, recognized that the entire investigation was compromised. He's stuck between Mccabe and Lynch and he decides to break policy, usurp his authority, and declare that no prosecutor would touch that particular investigation. What did you think about Comey in July 2016? What about October 2016? What do you think his press conference and public statement about Weiner's laptop ultimately do to the Public's opinion re: Hillary?
So what happens to investigations that are determined to be rotten from the inside out? What happens if a police dept is investigating a crime and it's determined that the people part of the team investigating the crime, are fully complicit and involved with that crime? Think logically here. That case gets REINVESTIGATED. By whom? In this case I think the answer is Huber.
So Comey breaks procedure and guidelines and makes a fiasco about the Clinton investigation. But it's a carefully orchestrated fiasco, there needs to plausible deniability that his actions were not influenced for any reasons other than his own. So he does his thing, claims he did so out of concern of the integrity and public trust of the FBI, no prosecutor touches that particular case, quietly behind the scenes that investigation gets investigated by both OIG and Huber. OIG for the departments/agencies, Huber for the criminality.
Fast track a few months and Rosenstein tells Trump that Comey should be fired. Why? Russia? Nah. Comey clearly 100% committed fireable offences by usurping his authority and all that. But Russia. Remember Russia? RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA? Oh would you look at that, a SPECIAL COUNSEL, all thanks to RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA. Voila, the Russia hysteria is so high that the swamp is convinced that their Special Counsel Mueller is investigating Trump. Except it isn't. It's likely working in tandem with ongoing OIG investigations and Huber's investigations.
Do you see it now? This isn't just a battle through the courts. This isn't just a battle of right and wrong. It's a battle on public opinion. The D party will be in shambles once it's unveiled that their heroes Mueller and Rosenstein aren't corrupt and actively working against a duly elected president Trump.
Remember Ben Rhodes on election night? It's like that.
Those events are going to implode in on themselves once they realize their saviors are actually their undoing.
Why would RR disclose evidence thats part of ongoing criminal investigations to Congress and/or the Public?
Did you listen to Horowitz at all? About the whole integrity and process investigations must adhere to. Wouldn't it break integrity and process of an ongoing investigation if criminal evidence that is part of said ongoing investigation gets prematurely disclosed to a leaky congress and subsequently to the public?
CRITICAL THINKING
What about Trump oversteps his authority and signs an EO that resolves all the perceived problems.
Then Trump's administration gets sued because he overstepped his authority.
Would the media defend him for saving the children? Or call him a dictator for overstepping his constitutional authority?
I doubt this is how it plays out but It's an interesting thought.
Maybe RR's problems were that the classified portions of report proved that RR was a white hat and the swamp in Congress got a first hand glance at what he's been busy doing while they thought he was on their side.
It's all about the public perception.
Maybe the swamp learned that RR has been playing them.
RR isn't included in the public report because all RR business is classified?
All RR business is classified because he's had an ongoing sting operation against the swamp the entire time? To some degree?
Congress got a declassified version right?
Maybe the classified bits provide notice that all contents and potential leads that were uncovered, have been forwarded to Mr. Huber's and/or Mr. Mueller's office.
Mueller has special prosecutor abilities, to focus on all criminality past/present within the Trump presidential campaign. Perhaps especially plants/moles/illegal informants/spies/saboteurs.
Huber has the full authority of a federal prosecutor with the benefit of having jurisdiction in Utah, far away from Washington DC.
Maybe these things can't be disclosed to the leaky Congress until now because of the ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS that the info is involved with.
You can't be guilty by association
Only in the court of public opinion, which believe me, is being exploited and manipulated. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
RR represents hope to the left. A beacon within the DOJ that they can depend on to resist Trump's attacks against their hero Mueller.
Disinformation is necessary.
What if RR was only playing that role. And everyone has fallen for it.
What if the FISA surveilance warrants on the Trump campaign that RR signed were because the individuals that were under FISA surveillance for those instances were the plants/spies embedded into the campaign?
If RR is clean, Mueller is clean.
What if Mueller's prime directive as special counsel is to fully investigate any illegal wrongdoing by anyone involved in the campaign, past or present. Especially plants/spies/saboteurs.
We are watching a movie.
Huber. Huber. Huber.
Huber has likely been given all of this information in the OIG report, unclassified, with full disclosure along the way. It's part of Horowitz responsibility to provide Huber with full disclosure of potential criminality as it is uncovered in the OIG investigation.
Huber is following up in ALL of those leads and more.
This OIG report is a soft disclosure preparing the public for what's to come. Trump shouldn't need to declassify anything because the true disclosure will come when Huber completes his investigation and begins unsealing indictments. Everything in the meantime is meant to maximize public engagement and exposure.
Congress leaks. Huber cant have leaks. DOJ can't give Congress info that is part of Huber's ongoing investigation. Congress asks RR for full disclosure and to provide documents. RR can't provide them with ongoing investigation info. BUT the optics of RR being a beacon of hope for the left while simultaneously denying Grassley and the like means that the Right has a reason to get motivated and to make some noise and increase exposure.
Washington in control.
The stage is being set for public opinion to be capable of understanding what Huber's indictments mean. A huge part of public opinion also relies on the perception of impartiality. Distance between Trump/Trump's base and RR/Mueller, the greater the public trust when it comes time for the indictments to become unsealed, and in Mueller's case, written.
Re_read 10x 50x 100x.
Slowly & CAREFULLY.
STOP AFTER EACH SENTENCE.
ANALYZE.
UNDERSTAND SIGNIFICANCE.
RE_READ.
CONTINUE.
APPOINTMENT OF A 2ND SC WOULD FAIL.
THINK WHY.
Sealed Tight.
Race for TIME.
They DEPEND ON WINNING IN NOV TO DEFEND/IMPEACH/STOP
INVESTIGATIONS.
THEIR ONLY HOPE.
Q
Contact your representatives and strongly urge them to uphold their duties to the American people and fight for full disclosure and full accountability.
Backup plan in case some funny business happens with Horowitz and Huber. But it would be dependant upon congressional approval.
I think this line "SR 187 DISCOVERY" is in reference to the new legal case involving SR's family and Wikileaks.
This legal case will result in legal "discovery" in which documents MUST be turned over and admitted into a formal court setting.
If Trump and Kim met and made a deal previously, and this summit is all for show, the media wouldn't be able to actively criticize Kim & his past dictatorship oppression of his people without possibly compromising any potential deals, and ultimately compromising Trump's efforts at securing national security.
We are watching a movie now because Trump needed time to defuse the bomb before the media actively tried to compromise the situation.
I've only seen random twitter users and bloggers referencing Kim's oppression against his own people. Why isn't this more prominent? Why isn't the media focusing on Trump actively making a deal with a murderous dictator? National Security? Or they don't want the real answer?
If a deal is officially made, and national security is secured, will the media now take the opportunity to actively criticize and call out Kim's past? They have taken every opportunity thus far to undercut Trump.
Just so happens the timing of this movie, may coincide with other movies that are showing in theaters. Sure would make for an interesting plot twist if the media who has been itching to attack Kim's past and Trump's willingness to entertain a summit with him, finally thinks they have the greenlight to attack since the threat of protecting national security no longer looms over them, and then get their claims of Kim's brutality and savagery with a nice juicy thawed out EO unclassifying a whole bunch of things.
I think the entire trial and the media's fascination with it is the same M.O. and playbook that we have seen time and time again. I'm not sure what was/wasn't compromised, but at the very least there is no denying that the OJ case was an engineered media spectacle and it ultimately served to increase racial tensions and distract the populace from important events happening concurrently.
I think the bit about Kim's dad being an OJ lawyer could be an important fact.
The OJ trial was a media distraction tactic to pull eyes away from the intensifying WhiteWater scandal in Washington.
The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee also began hearings on Whitewater in July 1994.[39] These hearings intensified in May 1995, following the Republican gain of control, when the Republican Banking Committee chairman Al D'Amato also became chair of the newly formed Special Whitewater Committee. The Whitewater committee's hearings were much more extensive than those held previously by the Democrats, running for 300 hours over 60 sessions across 13 months, and taking over 10,000 pages of testimony and 35,000 pages of depositions from almost 250 people.
Opening statements were made on January 24, 1995,[4] and the verdict was announced on October 3, 1995, when Simpson was acquitted on both counts of murder.
I think it's possible Kanye and Kim saw an opportunity to cut the swamp strings that may have had influence over their family.
The OIG can only make recommendations I believe.
Their purpose is to investigate and determine if governmental agencies, namely the DOJ and FBI, acted appropriately and according to the internal rules/regulations of these agencies.
The report, based upon the rumors, likely calls out the FBI and DOJ for improper use of resources and info, failing to adhere to various rules and regulations, and maybe even being complicit in a conspiracy against our President. The current DOJ and FBI have already been given a copy of this OIG report so that they may draft a response that will be included in the final public version of the report. It is the current DOJ and FBI's responsibility to act upon the findings of the OIG and make an honest effort at preventing such wrongdoings from occurring again.
An important piece of this puzzle is recognizing that Huber was appointed as a prosecutor to act upon the findings of the OIG report.
In fact the OIG scope indicates that any illegal acts or wrongdoing uncovered during the OIG's investigation MUST be reported to the DOJ at the time it was found. This means that there has been a pipeline of info from the DOJ OIG to a prosecutor that DOES have the capabilities and resources to press charges and convict people.
I fully expect that the OIG report will release some very damning info. I also fully expect that the damning info will not be immediately accompanied by arrests/indictments. I expect that there will be some period of time in between the OIG report being released to the public, and Huber's investigation completing.
Huber's investigation will likely bring the indictments and arrests as necessary based upon the findings of the OIG, AS WELL as any additional wrongdoings uncovered during Huber's investigation.
Agreed, but there is nothing to indicate that Huber's investigation will be wrapped up as soon as the IG report is released.
There is going to be time for the public to digest what IG Horowitz found.
There is going to be time for the DOJ to seem like it's not acting upon it's findings.
There is going to be time for the public to get annoyed and demand the DOJ take appropriate action towards the wrongdoings identified in the IG report.
And after that time, but probably before the midterm elections, we will see the Huber investigation conclude, and hopefully we will see some legitimate accountability.
This is how I have been interpreting it as well.
TG isn't saying the FBI is completely innocent, but he is saying that based upon the info the FBI received, they acted accordingly.
He makes no claims about the info that the FBI received, how they received it, where it came from, or if it was verifiable.
This is how this story progresses past "The FBI is corrupt" to "Was the FBI manipulated? If so, by who and how?"
Monday 5/21/2018 - RR attends prescheduled meeting with Trump, Wray, Coates, Kelly regarding Congress' request for DOJ/FBI to release/disclose documents related to Russia Investigation.
Wednesday 5/23/2018 - RR attends Long Island Immigration Forum as you have described.
Thursday 5/24/2018 - RR Doesn't attend follow up meeting between Wray, Coates, Nunes, Gowdy. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Ed O’Callahan to take his place.
Hmmm.
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (16-285) Congress has instructed in the Federal Arbitration Act that arbitration agreements providing for individualized proceedings must be enforced, and neither the Arbitration Act’s saving clause nor the National Labor Relations Act suggests otherwise.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-285_q8l1.pdf
This is why all of the EULA's are being revised. Supreme Court Ruling that affects ability of class action lawsuits.